Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering Faculty of Engineering and Environment
MCE | Studying and Instructing Model 2.zero | Web page 1 of four
Coursework Specification
1 Module Info 1.1 Module Title Construction venture planning and supply
1.2 Module Code Quantity KB7039
1.three Module Stage and Credit score Factors 7 20 credit
1.four Module Chief Hazel Ponton
1.5 Assessment Element Quantity (on Module Specification) 02
1.6 Assessment Weighting (on Module Specification) 60%
1.7 Coursework Title Options to a building trade downside
1.eight Coursework Specification Writer Hazel Ponton
1.9 Educational Yr and Semester(s) 2019-20 Semester 2 solely
2 Coursework Submission and Suggestions 2.1 Launch Date of Coursework Specification to College students W/c 27th January 2020
2.2 Mechanism Used to Disseminate Coursework Specification to College students eLP
2.three Date and Time of Submission of Coursework by College students 11:59 pm 12th Could 2020
2.four The mechanism for Submission of Coursework by College students eLP
2.5 Return Date of Unconfirmed Internally Moderated Mark(s) and Suggestions to College students ninth June 2020
2.6 The mechanism for Return of Unconfirmed Internally Moderated Mark(s) and Suggestions to College students eLP
MCE | Studying and Instructing Model 2.zero | Web page 2 of four
three Assessment Particulars three.1 Module Studying Outcomes (MLOs) Assessed by Coursework
What is going to I be anticipated to attain? Data & Understanding: MLO1 – Reveal information and understanding of the work-based observe by the Assessment and analysis of research-based idea and related case research, by formulating options to the efficient and environment friendly supply of building engineering initiatives. Mental / Skilled expertise & skills: MLO2 – Critically consider progressive approaches to product, course of and companies supply in building engineering by consideration of idea and observe. Private Values Attributes: MLO3 – Formulate methods for enchancment throughout the world building engineering trade to show cultural, moral and sustainable consciousness.
three.2 Coursework Overview There are two assessed items of work on this module, that are linked and will permit the you to indicate a development of studying throughout the module. The second element requires the you to think about present issues associated to waste within the building trade. As soon as the you’ve chosen a single downside and can outline the issue, it is advisable to critically analyse the potential options formulated from the module and present thought-about options to the issue, with clear hyperlinks between the issue and the potential options.
three.three Coursework Duties to be Accomplished by College students You’ll produce a person illustrated journal of not more than 6no. A3 pages (panorama) (Excluding entrance web page, Content material web page and Reference Listing). The illustrated journal wants to incorporate all of the next:
1. Choose a building trade downside associated to types of waste mentioned through the module, together with a brief description and a press release that clearly and concisely defines the scope of the issue.
2. Justify (by trade and educational literature) why it is a downside, who the issue impacts, and the influence of the issue.
three. Critically analyse potential options to the issue from studying throughout this module AND unbiased analysis.
four. Present a visible illustration that hyperlinks the issue to the options, i.e. fishbone diagram or one other appropriate visible software.
5. A visible enchancment mannequin which summarises HOW the issue may be solved. 6. The illustrated journal ought to use an efficient mixture of textual content AND photos to supply an fascinating and
visually participating doc. All photos ought to be related and of an acceptable dimension and high quality.
The illustrated journal ought to embrace cited, good high quality educational literature, in addition to trade finest observe. The content material ought to be guided by the educational outcomes, the marking standards and the educational from this module.
three.four Anticipated Dimension of Submission A person illustrated journal of not more than 6no. A3 pages (panorama) (Excluding entrance web page, Content material web page and Reference Listing). If greater than 6 pages of content material are offered, solely the primary 6 pages shall be marked and assessed.The illustrated journal is to incorporate roughly 50% textual content (utilizing font dimension 10) and roughly 50% photos.
MCE | Studying and Instructing Model 2.zero | Web page three of four
three.5 Referencing Fashion
You might be to jot down your coursework utilizing the Cite Them Proper model of the Harvard referencing system. A web-based information to Cite Them Proper is freely obtainable to Northumbria College college students at: https://www.citethemrightonline.com/
three.6 Assessment Standards High quality of presentation (together with the power to generate viewers curiosity) 10% Depth of Assessment of the trade downside 30% Assessment of potential options 40% Means to narrate the issues to the options (visible illustration) 10% Readability and relevance of the mannequin. (Visible mannequin to signify resolution) 10%
four Referral
The Referral Try alternative will typically happen after the end-of-level Development and Awards Board (PAB). If you happen to develop into eligible to finish a Referral Try however are subsequently unable to undertake the chance when required, you may be permitted to re-sit the module on the subsequent scheduled sitting of the module Assessment. It will sometimes entail the suspension of your development in your programme of research till such time that you’ve got accomplished the extent and develop into eligible to proceed.
5 Steerage for College students on Insurance policies for Assessment
The College has a number of insurance policies for Assessment. The next info, which is accessible to you from the hyperlink beneath, offers steerage on these insurance policies, together with related procedures and types.
(1) Assessment Rules and Insurance policies (a) Assessment Rules for Taught Awards (b) Group Work Assessments Coverage (c) Moderation Coverage (d) Retention of Assessed Work Coverage (e) Phrase Limits Coverage
(2) Assessment Suggestions (a) Nameless Marking Coverage
(three) Late Submission of Work and Extension Requests (four) Private Extenuating Circumstances (5) Technical Extenuating Circumstances (6) Scholar Complaints and Appeals (7) Educational Misconduct (eight) Scholar Incapacity and Unexpected Medical Circumstances
https://www.northumbria.ac.uk/about-us/university-services/academic-registry/quality-and-teaching- excellence/Assessment/guidance-for-students/
https://www.citethemrightonline.com/
MCE | Studying and Instructing Model 2.zero | Web page four of four
KB7039 Construction Mission Planning and Supply – Project 2 [to be marked out of 100% and converted] Title ………………………………… Mark:
OUTCOMES I CAN’T BELIEVE IT!
[ 100%]
WOW! [ 85%] DISTINCTIVE [ 75%] COMMENDABLE [ 65%]
PASS [ 55%] FAIL [ 45%] POOR FAIL [ 0%]
High quality of presentation (together with the power to generate viewers curiosity) 10%
This work is of excellent high quality and has shocked the markers.
Reveals deeper studying than would usually be anticipated.
Glorious and very clear with few issues.
Superb and moderately clear with some issues.
Fairly a number of issues however general the message was acquired
Too many issues so the presentation was unclear.
Very poor with little capacity to specific the concepts in a transparent and fascinating method.
Depth of Assessment of the trade issues 30%
A great try with few errors – the scholar clearly understands the issues.
A great try with some errors – the scholar’s understanding is mostly good
Some try with some errors – the scholar’s understanding is suitable.
Little try with many errors – the scholars present little understanding.
Little or no effort has gone into this – the scholar exhibits no actual understanding.
Assessment of potential options 40%
The scholar has a wonderful grasp of potential options.
The scholar has a superb grasp of potential options though there are some minor issues.
The scholar doesn’t absolutely grasp the options however there may be some advantage in what is claimed.
The scholar just isn’t capable of analyse options although there may be proof of a good try.
The scholar has little or no grasp of the problems.
Means to narrate the issues to the options (visible) 10%
Options are clearly and cogently linked to issues.
Options come up from issues in most situations though there may be some lack of readability.
Some linkage of options and issues however the work lacks depth.
Proof of solely floor understanding of linkages.
Little proof of capacity to derive the options from the issues.
Readability and relevance of the advance mannequin 10%
The readability of expression and cogency of the argument are typically glorious with few issues.
The readability of expression and cogency of the argument are typically good although there are a number of issues.
The readability of expression and cogency of the argument are typically acceptable however there may be some confusion.
The work lacks readability and cogency – troublesome to comply with
The work is complicated and has little advantage.
Suggestions – three areas of good observe, three areas for potential enchancment:
1 Module Info
1.1 Module Title Construction venture planning and supply
1.2 Module Code Quantity KB7039
1.three Module Stage and Credit score Factors 7 20 credit
1.four Module Chief Hazel Ponton
1.5 Assessment Element Quantity (on Module Specification) 02
1.6 Assessment Weighting (on Module Specification) 60%
1.7 Coursework Title Options to a building trade downside
1.eight Coursework Specification Writer Hazel Ponton
1.9 Educational Yr and Semester(s) 2019-20 Semester 2 solely
2 Coursework Submission and Suggestions
2.1 Launch Date of Coursework Specification to College students W/c 27th January 2020
2.2 Mechanism Used to Disseminate Coursework Specification to College students eLP
2.three Date and Time of Submission of Coursework by College students 11:59 pm 12th Could 2020
2.four The mechanism for Submission of Coursework by College students eLP
2.5 Return Date of Unconfirmed Internally Moderated Mark(s) and Suggestions to College students ninth June 2020
2.6 The mechanism for Return of Unconfirmed Internally Moderated Mark(s) and Suggestions to College students eLP
three Assessment Particulars
three.1 Module Studying Outcomes (MLOs) Assessed by Coursework
three.2 Coursework Overview
three.three Coursework Duties to be Accomplished by College students
three.four Anticipated Dimension of Submission
three.5 Referencing Fashion
three.6 Assessment Standards
four Referral
———-
Faculty of Engineering and Environment Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering
Web page 1 of four | MCE | Studying and Instructing Model 2.zero
Specs for Coursework
1 Module Info 1.1 Module Title Planning and supply of building initiatives
KB7039 KB7039 KB7039 KB7039 KB7039 KB7039
1.three Credit score Factors and Module Stage 7 20 factors
Hazel Ponton, 1.four Module Chief
1.5 Quantity of Assessment Elements (on Module Specification) 02
1.6 Weighting of the Assessment (on Module Specification) sixty p.c
1.7 Coursework Title Drawback-solving within the building trade
1.eight Coursework Necessities Hazel Ponton is the creator of this e-book.
2019-20 Semester 2 only one.9 Educational Yr and Semester(s)
2 Suggestions and Submission of Coursework 2.1 Coursework Specification Launch to College students W/c 27th January 2020
2.2 Coursework Specification Dissemination Mechanism for College students eLP
2.three Date and Time of Submission
5 Steerage for College students on Insurance policies for Assessment
