Develop a 3- to 4-page paper considering the role and efficacy of the leader of a group therapy demonstration. Be sure to address the following: • Describe the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated and evaluate how well they were demonstrated. . Include evidence from the literature that supports the use of the demonstrated techniques.– Write a three- to four-page paper about the role and effectiveness of the group therapy leader. Don’t forget to talk about the following: • Describe the techniques for group therapy that were shown and rate how well they were shown. Include evidence from the research that shows how the techniques shown can be used. —
Excellent
90%–100% 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
Good
80%–89% 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
Fair
70%–79% 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
Poor
0%–69% 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
• Identify what the therapist did well. • Explain something that you would have handled differently. • Identify an insight that you gained form watching the therapist handle the group therapy.–
Excellent
90%–100% 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
Good
80%–89% 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
Fair
70%–79% 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
Poor
0%–69% 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
Imagine that you are leading your own group session. • Describe how would you go about handling a difficult group member. • Explain how you would elicit participation in your group. • Describe what you would anticipate to find in different phases of the group therapy. • Explain the benefits and challenges of group therapy.–
Excellent
90%–100% 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
Good
80%–89% 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
Fair
70%–79% 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
Poor
0%–69% 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
• Support your reasoning with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.–
Excellent
90%–100% 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Good
80%–89% 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Fair
70%–79% 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Poor
0%–69% 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.–
Excellent
90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Good
80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Fair
70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Poor
0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–
Excellent
90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Good
80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Fair
70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Poor
0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–
Excellent
90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Good
80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Fair
70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Poor
0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
