Discuss Theology
Theology is discussed in depth.
In reality, current theology is a blend of the two potential viewpoints, which is the correct position to choose. Theology in the twenty-first century is, in some ways, a complement or a correction to traditional theology. For those who believe that the Bible and God’s word are something that should be understood and re-discovered during one’s lifetime, modern or contemporary theology must be viewed as individuals’ abilities to re-discover ancient theology in novel and innovative ways. For want of a better phrase, the Bible is the type of text that new thinking can perpetually re-discover through new interpretation.
At the same hand, it is possible that viewing contemporary theology as a “correction” to traditional theology is erroneous. It is preferable to think of it as a progression in the field of new theology. It is not accurate to declare categorically that current theology is diametrically opposed to contemporary theology. The truth is that current theology is neither more correct nor more erroneous than traditional theology in terms of doctrine. One of the most important realities of contemporary theology is that it is not an addition or a correction, but rather a new way of looking at things. In many ways, contemporary theology can complement and enhance traditional theological practices. Using the gospel as an example, contemporary theology may be able to disclose fresh ways in which the gospel might be applied in order to address contemporary challenges. Most of the time, theology is thought of in archaic terms, but Christians are constantly looking for ways to apply their biblical teachings to the problems that they experience in their daily lives. Contemporary theology is an endeavor not only to “correct” traditional theology, but also to take the old interpretations and adapt them to contemporary situations that people may encounter on a daily basis, rather than to “correct” traditional theology.
There are instances when modern theology appears to be at odds with conventional ideas, and this is understandable. In some instances, the two may disagree with one another. Nonetheless, it is critical to recognize the fact that the claimed differences between modern and traditional theology are essentially variations in degree rather than differences in kind. A “correction” is not the same as presenting a “new interpretation,” because it involves different persons applying a new interpretation at different times.
Essay No. 2
New Atheism is as close to atheism as it is possible to get. In fact, it may even fall into a category that is even more radical than outright atheist. The reason for this is because New Atheism not only promotes the principles of atheism, but it also purports to attack every aspect of religious belief and practice. It seeks to engage religion in a very palpable way by giving religion with an active social critique that strives to force religion, and notably Christianity, to answer the questions about itself on a consistent basis.
Because it has a very precise interpretation of the words of Jesus on the topic of the poor, liberation theology is on the other side of the spectrum from atheism on the religious spectrum. Whilst many religious traditions speak on the ways in which one’s own life might be improved, liberation theology is concerned specifically with Jesus’ words on how to interact with the poor and how to Help the poor. In a paradoxical way, this makes it more similar to atheism, as New Atheism is more concerned with how Christianity and religion fail to help the poor.
a new epoch At the other end of the spectrum, religion is quite near to atheism, as it tends to respect a wide range of religious interpretations rather than focusing on a single extremely particular form of Christianity. This is a type of religion that tends to look at religion with a much more critical eye when viewed through the lens of humanism.
In terms of liberation theology, the “Jesus Seminar” is something that is closely associated. It aspires to discover the “authentic” Jesus, which is akin to attempting to discover Jesus through his teachings with the impoverished. This type of Christian movement is primarily focused with criticizing the precepts of Christianity, which puts it in a position that is fairly similar to that of atheism.
Orthodoxy is located on the opposite end of the religious spectrum from atheism. When it comes to Christianity, it deals with the specific allegiance to Christianity, which would veer quite sharply away from an examination of religion that called into doubt the basic reality of God.
References
Cimino, R., and Smith, C. (in press) (2011). The New Atheism and the emergence of an imaginary secularist community are discussed. The Journal of Media and Religion, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 24-38.
J. F. Haught, Jr. (2008). This book is a critical response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens’s New Atheism. The Westminster John Knox Press is located in Westminster, Kentucky.
Stenger, V. J., et al (2009). The new atheism is about taking a stand for science and reason rather than religion. Prometheus Books is a publishing house based in New York City.
