Dialogue: Review of Current Healthcare Issues
If you happen to had been to ask 10 folks what they consider to be probably the most important concern going through healthcare right now, you would possibly get 10 totally different solutions. Escalating prices? Regulation? Expertise disruption?
These and lots of different subjects are worthy of dialogue. Not surprisingly, a lot has been mentioned within the analysis, throughout the career, and within the information about these subjects. Whether or not they’re points of finance, high quality, workload, or outcomes, there isn’t a scarcity of modifications to be addressed.
On this Dialogue, you study a nationwide healthcare concern and contemplate how that concern might affect your work setting. You additionally analyze how your group has responded to this concern.
To Put together:
Review the Sources and choose one present nationwide healthcare concern/stressor to give attention to.
Mirror on the present nationwide healthcare concern/stressor you chose and take into consideration how this concern/stressor could also be addressed in your work setting.
By Day three of Week 1
Put up an outline of the nationwide healthcare concern/stressor you chose for Assessment, and clarify how the healthcare concern/stressor might affect your work setting. Then, describe how your well being system work setting has responded to the healthcare concern/stressor, together with an outline of what modifications might have been applied. Be particular and supply examples.
By Day 6 of Week 1
Reply to at the least two of your colleagues on two totally different days who selected a unique nationwide healthcare concern/stressor than you chose. Clarify how their chosen nationwide healthcare concern/stressor may affect your work setting and what (if something) is being finished to handle the nationwide healthcare concern/stressor.
NURS_6053_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View
Listing View
Wonderful Good Truthful Poor
Essential Posting
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Solutions all elements of the dialogue Question Assignment(s) expectations with reflective essential Assessment and synthesis of data gained from the course readings for the module and present credible sources.
Supported by at the least three present, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and totally adheres to present APA handbook writing guidelines and magnificence.
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the dialogue Question Assignment(s) and is reflective with essential Assessment and synthesis of data gained from the course readings for the module.
At the least 75% of submit has distinctive depth and breadth.
Supported by at the least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and totally adheres to present APA handbook writing guidelines and magnificence.
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the dialogue Question Assignment(s).
One or two standards are usually not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is considerably missing reflection and demanding Assessment and synthesis.
Considerably represents data gained from the course readings for the module.
Put up is cited with two credible sources.
Written considerably concisely; might include greater than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Comprises some APA formatting errors.
zero (zero%) – 34 (34%)
Doesn’t reply to the dialogue Question Assignment(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses standards.
Lacks reflection and demanding Assessment and synthesis.
Doesn’t signify data gained from the course readings for the module.
Comprises just one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Comprises greater than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Doesn’t adhere to present APA handbook writing guidelines and magnificence.
Essential Put up: Timeliness
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts major submit by day three.
zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
Doesn’t submit by day three.
First Response
17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response displays synthesis, essential pondering, and software to observe settings.
Responds totally to questions posed by school.
Gives clear, concise opinions and concepts which are supported by at the least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of studying goals.
Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to college questions are totally answered, if posed.
Response is successfully written in customary, edited English.
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response displays essential pondering and software to observe settings.
Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to college questions are answered, if posed.
Gives clear, concise opinions and concepts which are supported by two or extra credible sources.
Response is successfully written in customary, edited English.
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on subject and should have some depth.
Responses posted within the dialogue might lack efficient skilled communication.
Responses to college questions are considerably answered, if posed.
Response might lack clear, concise opinions and concepts, and some or no credible sources are cited.
zero (zero%) – 12 (12%)
Response will not be on subject and lacks depth.
Responses posted within the dialogue lack efficient skilled communication.
Responses to college questions are lacking.
No credible sources are cited.
Second Response
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response displays synthesis, essential pondering, and software to observe settings.
Responds totally to questions posed by school.
Gives clear, concise opinions and concepts which are supported by at the least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of studying goals.
Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to college questions are totally answered, if posed.
Response is successfully written in customary, edited English.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response displays essential pondering and software to observe settings.
Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to college questions are answered, if posed.
Gives clear, concise opinions and concepts which are supported by two or extra credible sources.
Response is successfully written in customary, edited English.
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on subject and should have some depth.
Responses posted within the dialogue might lack efficient skilled communication.
Responses to college questions are considerably answered, if posed.
Response might lack clear, concise opinions and concepts, and some or no credible sources are cited.
zero (zero%) – 11 (11%)
Response will not be on subject and lacks depth.
Responses posted within the dialogue lack efficient skilled communication.
Responses to college questions are lacking.
No credible sources are cited.
Participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets necessities for participation by posting on three totally different days.
zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
Doesn’t meet necessities for participation by posting on three totally different days.
Complete Factors: 100
Title: NURS_6053_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric
