DNP 820 Week 4 Introduction to the Literature Review
DNP 820 Week 4 Introduction to the Literature Review
Particulars:
Empirical analysis is the basis of scholarly analysis and scholarly writing. An empirical article is outlined as one which studies precise outcomes of a analysis research. An empirical article features a description of the research, an introduction, a analysis Question Assignment, a proof of the research’s methodology, a presentation of the outcomes of the research, and a conclusion that discusses the outcomes and suggests matters for additional research.
As you search the library for scholarly analysis, it’s best to restrict your search to determine empirical articles. (You should use the “Empirical Analysis Guidelines” from DNP-801 to help on this willpower.) After discovering an empirical research, start to assess the validity of the conclusion by figuring out if the conclusion solutions the proposed analysis Question Assignment and if the methodology is acceptable.
As you progress ahead in your doctoral journey, you’ll learn analysis papers that may require you to assess the validity of the research in Question Assignment. To perform this, qualitative assessments about the analysis have to be made by evaluating, contrasting, and synthesizing what the analysis says.
On this task, you’ll proceed to develop the talent of writing, by reviewing 15 analysis articles related together with your chosen subject and utilizing the content material to determine not less than 5 main ideas and subthemes associated to your subject.
Common Necessities:
Use the following data to guarantee profitable completion of this task:
Use the “Empirical Analysis Guidelines” to help in the willpower of empirical articles.
Use the “Analysis Article Chart” to present a abstract overview of every element of your task.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA type for his or her writing assignments. The APA Type Information is positioned in the Scholar Success Middle.
This task makes use of a rubric. Please overview the rubric prior to starting the task to change into accustomed to the expectations for profitable completion.
You might be required to submit this task to LopesWrite. Please refer to the instructions in the Scholar Success Middle.
Instructions:
Half 1: Number of 15 Articles
Choose 15 empirical articles associated to your PICOT Question Assignment. Use the “Empirical Analysis Guidelines” worksheet to be certain that every article you choose meets all of the established standards. No less than one article should show a quantitative methodology.
Half 2: Analysis Article Chart
Utilizing the articles acquired in Half 1, present a abstract overview of every element utilizing the “Analysis Article Chart” template.
Half Three: Synthesis of Analysis Research
Based mostly upon your overview of the 15 analysis articles, determine not less than 5 main ideas that relate to your undertaking subject, and three subthemes associated to every idea.
Utilizing the data from the accomplished “Analysis Article Chart,” and the main ideas and subthemes you may have recognized, write a 2,000-Three,000 phrase paper that synthesizes the content material of the 15 analysis research.
Summarize every main idea and give attention to offering an in depth synthesis of the three recognized subthemes that help that idea by addressing the following.
Introduction of the recognized subtheme
Abstract of the analysis questions posed by the research
Abstract of the pattern populations used
Abstract of the limitations of the research
Abstract of the conclusion and proposals for additional analysis
Portfolio Observe Hours:
Observe immersion assignments are primarily based in your present course targets, and are meant to be application-based studying utilizing your real-world apply setting. These assignments earn apply immersion hours, and are indicated in the task by a Portfolio Observe Hours assertion which reminds you, the learner, to enter in a corresponding case log in Typhon. Precise clock hours are entered, however the common hours related to every apply immersion task is 10.
You might be required to full your task utilizing real-world software. Actual-world software requires the use of evidence-based knowledge, modern theories, and ideas offered in the course. The end result of your task should current a viable software in a present apply setting. For extra data on parameters for apply immersion hours, please refer to DNP assets in the DC Community.
To earn portfolio apply hours, enter the following after the references part of your paper:
Observe Hours Completion Assertion DNP-820
I, (INSERT NAME), confirm that I’ve accomplished (NUMBER OF) clock hours in affiliation with the objectives and targets for this task. I’ve additionally tracked stated apply hours in the Typhon Scholar Monitoring System for verification functions and can make certain that all approvals are in place from my college and apply mentor.
DNP-820-RS-EmpiricalResearchChecklist-Scholar.docx DNP-820-RS-ResearchArticleChart.docx
Introduction to the Literature Review
1
Unsatisfactory
zero.00% 2
Much less Than Passable
74.00% Three
Passable
79.00% 4
Good
87.00% 5
Glorious
100.00%
70.zero %Content material
10.zero %Introduction An introduction is just not current. An introduction is current, but it surely doesn’t relate to the physique of the paper. An introduction is current, and it relates to the physique of the paper. There’s nothing in the introduction to entice the reader to proceed studying. An introduction is current, and it relates to the physique of the paper. Data offered in the introduction supplies a weak incentive for the reader to proceed studying. An introduction is current, and it relates to the physique of the paper. Data offered in the introduction is intriguing and encourages the reader to proceed studying.
15.zero %Synthesis of Analysis Questions No synthesis of analysis questions is offered. A synthesis of analysis questions is offered. Nevertheless, the synthesis is just not legitimate. A cursory although legitimate synthesis of analysis questions is offered. A reasonably thorough and legitimate synthesis of analysis questions is offered. A reflective and insightful synthesis of analysis questions is offered.
15.zero %Synthesis of Pattern Populations No synthesis of pattern populations is offered. A synthesis of pattern populations is offered. Nevertheless, the synthesis is just not legitimate. A cursory although legitimate synthesis of pattern populations is offered. A reasonably thorough and legitimate synthesis of pattern populations is offered. A reflective and insightful synthesis of pattern populations is offered.
15.zero %Synthesis of the Limitations of the Examine No synthesis of the limitations of the research is offered. A synthesis of the limitations of the research is offered. Nevertheless, the synthesis is just not legitimate. A cursory although legitimate synthesis of the limitations of the research is offered. A reasonably thorough and legitimate synthesis of the limitations of the research is offered. A reflective and insightful synthesis of the limitations of the research is offered.
15.zero %Conclusion and Suggestions for Additional Analysis No conclusion and proposals for additional analysis are offered. A conclusion and proposals for additional analysis are offered. Nevertheless, they aren’t legitimate. A cursory although legitimate conclusion and proposals for additional analysis are offered. A reasonably thorough and legitimate conclusion and proposals for additional analysis are offered. A reflective and insightful conclusion and proposals for additional analysis are offered.
20.zero %Group and Effectiveness
7.zero %Thesis Improvement and Objective Paper lacks any discernible general goal or organizing declare. Thesis and/or foremost declare are insufficiently developed and/or obscure; goal is just not clear. Thesis and/or foremost declare are obvious and applicable to goal. Thesis and/or foremost declare are clear and forecast the growth of the paper. It’s descriptive and reflective of the arguments and applicable to the goal. Thesis and/or foremost declare are complete. The essence of the paper is contained inside the thesis. Thesis assertion makes the goal of the paper clear.
eight.zero %Argument Logic and Building Assertion of goal is just not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion doesn’t help the declare made. Argument is incoherent and makes use of noncredible sources. Enough justification of claims is missing. Argument lacks constant unity. There are apparent flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, however could have just a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, however not completely, helps the goal. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument reveals logical progressions. Methods of argumentation are evident. There’s a easy development of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive declare in a particular and compelling method. All sources are authoritative.
5.zero %Mechanics of Writing (consists of spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Floor errors are pervasive sufficient that they impede communication of that means. Inappropriate phrase selection and/or sentence development are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language selection (register), sentence construction, and/or phrase selection are current. Some mechanical errors or typos are current, however aren’t overly distracting to the reader. Appropriate sentence construction and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is basically freed from mechanical errors, though just a few could also be current. A wide range of sentence constructions and efficient figures of speech are used. Author is clearly in charge of customary, written, educational English.
10.zero %Format
5.zero %Paper Format (use of applicable type for the main and task) Template is just not used appropriately or documentation format is never adopted appropriately. Applicable template is used, however some parts are lacking or mistaken. An absence of management with formatting is clear. Applicable template is used. Formatting is appropriate, though some minor errors could also be current. Applicable template is absolutely used. There are just about no errors in formatting type. All format parts are appropriate.
5.zero %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, and many others., as applicable to task and elegance) Sources aren’t documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as applicable to task and elegance, with quite a few formatting errors. Sources are documented, as applicable to task and elegance, though some formatting errors could also be current. Sources are documented, as applicable to task and elegance, and format is usually appropriate. Sources are fully and appropriately documented, as applicable to task and elegance, and format is freed from error.
100 %Whole Weightage
