Does God Exist To Descartes Essay, Research Paper

Upon casual scrutiny, one might presume that Rene Descartes is a? non-believer? in the being of a celestial being, a God that presides over worlds and gives us religion. However, this is merely non the instance? Descartes is merely seeking to destruct all of the uncertainnesss that have come about by the attempted scientific accounts of such a supreme being. For Rene Descartes and all of the other trusters in the universe, the being of God provides a convenient reply to unexplained inquiries, while ne’er supplying replies to the inquiries about God himself. This is evidenced a great trade in the round statement made by Descartes in the Meditations on First Philosophy. What follows is a brief history of the 3rd and 5th speculations, which provide Descartes? response to the cloaked inquiry, ? What is God? ? Can one perceive or corroborate the being of an thought that is external to him, an thought such as God? In order to find the reply we must get down by understanding the ways in which we can reason an objects? being.

Descartes explains three ways in which a individual might come to such a decision? the first, through nature ; the 2nd, through experiencing a value that is independent of the will of the object ; and the 3rd, the nonsubjective world of an thought, or the? cause and consequence profile. ? The 3rd point is the 1 that we will chiefly pass our clip with. Descartes drills us with the thought that an object will hold an consequence when it stems from a legitimate cause, or an initial thought that precedes with equal or superior belongingss in one? s mind. In other words, the head generates ideas and thoughts about a physical signifier, and develops a world for this signifier, through old scheme and beliefs. ? And although an thought may give rise to another thought, this reasoning backward can non, however, be infinite ; we must in the terminal range a first thought, the cause of which is, as it were, the original in which all the world that is found objectively in these thoughts is contained formally. ? The lone job with Descartes? statement is when the being of God arises as a impression, for there is no nutriment or thought for the impression of God to arise from. Is it possible, so, to make the thought of a finite being from an infinite being, outside of the physical and mental, in a province all of it? s ain? Descartes rapidly replies that the response would be that a finite being can non wholly, if at all, comprehend the thoughts that would do God to be, and hence the footing for uncertainty is lost in an intangible cogent evidence. Additionally, the mere fact that he believes that there is a God provides yet another piece of cogent evidence towards His being. This must be true, harmonizing to Descartes, with the proviso that the thought and belief must hold been placed in his consciousness by an outside factor. The concluding factor that convinces Descartes that there is a God is the fact of his ain being, along with the fact that he, himself, is non a God. This belief stems from the theory that if a adult male is one

ndependent from all other being and thoughts about signifiers and affair, so he has the ability to go infinite. Descartes says that if he himself were the? writer of his ain being? and independent of all being, so he would achieve a Godly degree of being. Ultimately, it is his ain dependance on another being that proves to him that there is a God. Many people are bred into faith, or borne into a set of thoughts about a peculiar space being. The interesting job with most types of religion in this mode is that the Bible that has been deemed to come from your God is besides the cogent evidence that God exists. This is the type of round definition that Descartes is seeking to avoid at all costs. Basically, it? s like utilizing a word in it? s ain definition, or? the definition of an apple is an apple. ? The statement begins to acquire a small spot equivocal when he begins discoursing the uncertainness of his beliefs. He is, as he claims, as certain of the thought of the Sun, the Moon, the Earth, even his ain rational though, as he is certain of God? s being. The most distressing portion of the full subdivision is the apprehension of formal and nonsubjective world. Remember his theory that being is flawlessness. To understand that to hold an thought is to be is one instance, but take for case the adult male whom can believe, merely as person thinks of God, of a being so perfectly imperfect, clearly and clearly, that it does non be. However, harmonizing to Descartes, since it has an nonsubjective world, it must follow that it besides must hold a formal world every bit good. Clearly, this is an impossibleness which I have yet to determine to the fullest grade. Ayn Rand? s The Fountainhead creates within it a hero who is so independent that he ceases to be within the public oculus? nevertheless, he ne’er ceases to be, as he ends up clearly being dependant on his ain belief of something greater. Whether Rand shared Descartes? position on the being of God is unsure, nevertheless can be applied to the full statement. If one is without an thought to endorse him up, one ceases to be? but who created the thought of the being in the first topographic point? And farther, who created and implanted within all existences the being of a higher, more defined, and more perfect being? It is through this logic that Descartes efforts, instead unsuccessfully in my head, to turn out that the being of God is non a rare spring of religion but instead a certainty in it? s ain perfect, unquestionable and finally non-comprehensible manner. He was surely chesty, though, in his ideas and Hagiographas, though, imputing features to a being that he himself will ne’er understand to the full. In my head, Descartes exceeded in many parts of his statement, but failed to turn out from a logical point of view the being of a higher being. We, as worlds, will take to bosom his ideals, but will go on to work on springs of religion and the prescribed Bibles and round definitions of our ain faiths.

Bibliography

Descartes, Meditations on the First Philosophy, Hackett Publishing Co.

33d