ubric Component
Select Grid View or Guidelines View to change the rubric’s format.
Content material materials
Title: NRNP_6670_Week11_Discussion_Rubric
• Grid View
• Guidelines View
Glorious Effectivity Superb Effectivity Competent Effectivity Proficient Effectivity Room for Enchancment
Principal Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with essential analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Components Fluctuate: 44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
* Utterly responds to the discusion question(s) *is reflecive with essential analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least three current, credible sources Components Fluctuate: 40 (40%) – 43 (43%)
* Responds to the discusion question(s) *is reflecive with essential analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of submit has distinctive depth and breadth * supported by at least three credible references Components Fluctuate: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
* Responds to lots of the discusion question(s) *is significantly reflecive with essential analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of submit has distinctive depth and breadth * supported by at least three credible references Components Fluctuate: 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
* Responds to among the many discusion question(s) * one to 2 requirements mustn’t addressed or are superficially addresed *is significantly lacking reflection and essential analysis and synthesis *significantly represents info gained from the course readings for the module. * submit is cited with fewer than 2 credible references Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – 30 (30%)
* Does not reply to the discusion question(s) * lacks depth or superficially addresses requirements *lacks reflection and essential analysis and synthesis *does not signify info gained from the course readings for the module. * accommodates only one or no credible references
Principal Posting: Writing Components Fluctuate: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
* Written clearly and concisely * Includes no grammatical or spelling errors * Completely adheres to current APA handbook writing tips and magnificence Components Fluctuate: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Written clearly and concisely * Might comprise one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA handbook writing tips and magnificence Components Fluctuate: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* Written concisely * Might comprise one to 2 grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA handbook writing tips and magnificence Components Fluctuate: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%)
*Writtten significantly concisely * Might comprise larger than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Includes some APA formatting erros Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – 4 (4%)
* Not written clearly or concisely * Includes larger than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA handbook writing tips and magnificence
Principal Posting: Nicely timed and full participation Components Fluctuate: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
* meets requirements for effectively timed and full participation * posts foremost dialogue by due date Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – 6 (6%)
* does not meet requirement for full participation
First Reponse
Put as much as colleague’s foremost submit that is reflective and justified with credible sources. Components Fluctuate: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
* response shows essential pondering and software program to use settings * responds to questions posed by college * utilizing scholarly sources to help ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of finding out goals Components Fluctuate: eight.5 (eight.5%) – eight.5 (eight.5%)
* response shows essential pondering and software program to use settings Components Fluctuate: 7.5 (7.5%) – eight (eight%)
* response has some depth and may exhibit essential pondering or software program to use setting Components Fluctuate: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
* response is on topic, may need some depth Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – 6 (6%)
* reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth
First Reponse: Writing Components Fluctuate: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
* Communication is expert and respectful to colleagues * Response to high school questions are completely answered if posed * Gives clear, concise opinions and ideas which could be supported by two or additional credible sources * Response is efficiently written in Regular Edited English Components Fluctuate: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Communication is expert and respectful to colleagues * Response to high school questions are answered if posed * Gives clear, concise opinions and ideas which could be supported by two or additional credible sources * Response is efficiently written in Regular Edited English Components Fluctuate: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* Communication is normally expert and respectful to colleagues * Response to high school questions are principally answered if posed * Gives opinions and ideas which could be supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Regular Edited English Components Fluctuate: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
* Responses posted throughout the dialogue may lack environment friendly expert communication * Response to high school questions are significantly answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – 4 (4%)
* Responses posted throughout the dialogue lack environment friendly * Response to high school questions are missing * No credible sources are cited
First Reponse: Nicely timed and full participation Components Fluctuate: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* meets requirements for effectively timed and full participation * posts by due date Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
* does not meet requirement for full participation
Second Reponse: Put as much as colleague’s foremost submit that is reflective and justified with credible sources. Components Fluctuate: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
* response shows essential pondering and software program to use settings * responds to questions posed by college * utilizing scholarly sources to help ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of finding out goals Components Fluctuate: eight.5 (eight.5%) – eight.5 (eight.5%)
* response shows essential pondering and software program to use settings Components Fluctuate: 7.5 (7.5%) – eight (eight%)
* response has some depth and may exhibit essential pondering or software program to use setting Components Fluctuate: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
* response is on topic, may need some depth Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – 6 (6%)
* reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth
Second Reponse: Writing Components Fluctuate: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
* Communication is expert and respectful to colleagues * Response to high school questions are completely answered if posed * Gives clear, concise opinions and ideas which could be supported by two or additional credible sources * Response is efficiently written in Regular Edited English Components Fluctuate: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Communication is expert and respectful to colleagues * Response to high school questions are answered if posed * Gives clear, concise opinions and ideas which could be supported by two or additional credible sources * Response is efficiently written in Regular Edited English Components Fluctuate: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* Communication is normally expert and respectful to colleagues * Response to high school questions are principally answered if posed * Gives opinions and ideas which could be supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Regular Edited English Components Fluctuate: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
* Responses posted throughout the dialogue may lack environment friendly expert communication * Response to high school questions are significantly answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – 4 (4%)
* Responses posted throughout the dialogue lack environment friendly * Response to high school questions are missing * No credible sources are cited
Second Reponse: Nicely timed and full participation Components Fluctuate: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* meets requirements for effectively timed and full participation * posts by due date Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Components Fluctuate: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
* does not meet requirement for full participation
Complete Components: 100
Title: NRNP_6670_Week11_Discussion_Rubric
Cultural Competence in Healthcare: Application of the Purnell Model Essay
Cultural Competence in Healthcare: A Case Study Analysis Using the Purnell Model Healthcare professionals increasingly encounter diverse patient populations, necessitating cultural competence for effective care delivery. This paper examines a significant cross-cultural healthcare interaction through the lens of the Purnell Model for Cultural Competence, emphasizing the critical role of communication in transcultural nursing care. Case […]