ubric Element
Choose Grid View or Checklist View to alter the rubric’s format.
Content material
Identify: NRNP_6670_Week11_Discussion_Rubric
• Grid View
• Checklist View
Excellent Efficiency Wonderful Efficiency Competent Efficiency Proficient Efficiency Room for Enchancment
Foremost Posting: Response to the discusion Question Assignment is reflecive with crucial Assessment and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and present credible sources. Factors Vary: 44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
* Completely responds to the discusion Question Assignment(s) *is reflecive with crucial Assessment and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and present credible sources. * supported by at the very least three present, credible sources Factors Vary: 40 (40%) – 43 (43%)
* Responds to the discusion Question Assignment(s) *is reflecive with crucial Assessment and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of submit has distinctive depth and breadth * supported by at the very least three credible references Factors Vary: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
* Responds to a lot of the discusion Question Assignment(s) *is considerably reflecive with crucial Assessment and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of submit has distinctive depth and breadth * supported by at the very least three credible references Factors Vary: 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
* Responds to among the discusion Question Assignment(s) * one to 2 standards should not addressed or are superficially addresed *is considerably missing reflection and important Assessment and synthesis *considerably represents information gained from the course readings for the module. * submit is cited with fewer than 2 credible references Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – 30 (30%)
* Doesn’t reply to the discusion Question Assignment(s) * lacks depth or superficially addresses standards *lacks reflection and important Assessment and synthesis *doesn’t symbolize information gained from the course readings for the module. * comprises only one or no credible references
Foremost Posting: Writing Factors Vary: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
* Written clearly and concisely * Incorporates no grammatical or spelling errors * Totally adheres to present APA handbook writing guidelines and magnificence Factors Vary: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Written clearly and concisely * Could include one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to present APA handbook writing guidelines and magnificence Factors Vary: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* Written concisely * Could include one to 2 grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to present APA handbook writing guidelines and magnificence Factors Vary: four (four%) – 5 (5%)
*Writtten considerably concisely * Could include greater than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Incorporates some APA formatting erros Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – four (four%)
* Not written clearly or concisely * Incorporates greater than two spelling or grammatical errors * Doesn’t adhere to present APA handbook writing guidelines and magnificence
Foremost Posting: Well timed and full participation Factors Vary: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
* meets necessities for well timed and full participation * posts most important dialogue by due date Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – 6 (6%)
* doesn’t meet requirement for full participation
First Reponse
Publish to colleague’s most important submit that’s reflective and justified with credible sources. Factors Vary: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
* response reveals crucial considering and software to apply settings * responds to questions posed by school * the usage of scholarly sources to Help concepts demonstrates synthesis and understanding of studying aims Factors Vary: eight.5 (eight.5%) – eight.5 (eight.5%)
* response reveals crucial considering and software to apply settings Factors Vary: 7.5 (7.5%) – eight (eight%)
* response has some depth and should exhibit crucial considering or software to apply setting Factors Vary: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
* response is on subject, might have some depth Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – 6 (6%)
* reponse will not be on subject, lacks depth
First Reponse: Writing Factors Vary: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
* Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues * Response to school questions are totally answered if posed * Offers clear, concise opinions and concepts which might be supported by two or extra credible sources * Response is successfully written in Normal Edited English Factors Vary: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues * Response to school questions are answered if posed * Offers clear, concise opinions and concepts which might be supported by two or extra credible sources * Response is successfully written in Normal Edited English Factors Vary: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* Communication is generally skilled and respectful to colleagues * Response to school questions are largely answered if posed * Offers opinions and concepts which might be supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Normal Edited English Factors Vary: four.5 (four.5%) – four.5 (four.5%)
* Responses posted within the dialogue might lack efficient skilled communication * Response to school questions are considerably answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – four (four%)
* Responses posted within the dialogue lack efficient * Response to school questions are lacking * No credible sources are cited
First Reponse: Well timed and full participation Factors Vary: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* meets necessities for well timed and full participation * posts by due date Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
* doesn’t meet requirement for full participation
Second Reponse: Publish to colleague’s most important submit that’s reflective and justified with credible sources. Factors Vary: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
* response reveals crucial considering and software to apply settings * responds to questions posed by school * the usage of scholarly sources to Help concepts demonstrates synthesis and understanding of studying aims Factors Vary: eight.5 (eight.5%) – eight.5 (eight.5%)
* response reveals crucial considering and software to apply settings Factors Vary: 7.5 (7.5%) – eight (eight%)
* response has some depth and should exhibit crucial considering or software to apply setting Factors Vary: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
* response is on subject, might have some depth Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – 6 (6%)
* reponse will not be on subject, lacks depth
Second Reponse: Writing Factors Vary: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
* Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues * Response to school questions are totally answered if posed * Offers clear, concise opinions and concepts which might be supported by two or extra credible sources * Response is successfully written in Normal Edited English Factors Vary: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues * Response to school questions are answered if posed * Offers clear, concise opinions and concepts which might be supported by two or extra credible sources * Response is successfully written in Normal Edited English Factors Vary: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* Communication is generally skilled and respectful to colleagues * Response to school questions are largely answered if posed * Offers opinions and concepts which might be supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Normal Edited English Factors Vary: four.5 (four.5%) – four.5 (four.5%)
* Responses posted within the dialogue might lack efficient skilled communication * Response to school questions are considerably answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – four (four%)
* Responses posted within the dialogue lack efficient * Response to school questions are lacking * No credible sources are cited
Second Reponse: Well timed and full participation Factors Vary: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* meets necessities for well timed and full participation * posts by due date Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%) Factors Vary: zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
* doesn’t meet requirement for full participation
Complete Factors: 100
Identify: NRNP_6670_Week11_Discussion_Rubric

Published by

Write

View all posts