Rubric
NU410 Wit Analysis Rubric
NU410 Wit Analysis Rubric
Standards Rankings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeTopic
NM410-CO2 5 pts
Degree 5
Identifies a inventive, targeted, and manageable subject clearly addressing vital factors. four.5 pts
Degree four
Identifies a manageable subject that addresses vital factors. four pts
Degree three
Identifies a targeted subject that addresses vital factors. three.5 pts
Degree 2
Identifies a subject that whereas doable, is simply too narrowly targeted. three pts
Degree 1
Identifies a subject that’s far too basic and wide-ranging as to be doable. zero pts
Degree zero
Doesn’t clearly establish a subject or identifies a subject that isn’t related to the project.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeExisting Data, Analysis, and/or Views
NM410-CO5 10 pts
Degree 5
Makes use of in-depth data from related sources representing a number of factors of views (three or extra) or analysis elements (three or extra). 9 pts
Degree four
Describes in-depth data from related sources representing at the least two factors of view or analysis elements. eight pts
Degree three
Explains data from related sources representing at the least two factors of view or analysis elements. 7 pts
Degree 2
Relates data from related and irrelevant sources. No clear perspective(s) of method(es) are recognized. 6 pts
Degree 1
Tells data from irrelevant sources representing a single perspective or doesn’t establish factors of view or approaches. zero pts
Degree zero
Info is irrelevant to the subject. No clear perspective/approaches.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeContent
NM410-CO4; NM410-CO6 30 pts
Degree 5
Demonstrates the power to assemble a transparent and insightful drawback assertion/thesis assertion/subject assertion with proof of all related contextual components. 27 pts
Degree four
Demonstrates the power to assemble an issue assertion, thesis assertion/subject assertion with proof of most related contextual components, and drawback assertion is satisfactorily detailed. 24 pts
Degree three
Begins to exhibit the power to assemble an issue assertion/thesis assertion/subject assertion with proof of most related contextual components, however drawback assertion is superficial. 21 pts
Degree 2
Demonstrates a restricted potential in figuring out an issue assertion/thesis assertion/subject assertion or associated contextual components. 18 pts
Degree 1
Demonstrates the power to clarify contextual components however doesn’t present an outlined assertion. zero pts
Degree zero
There isn’t a proof of an outlined assertion.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeAnalysis 25 pts
Degree 5
Organizes and compares proof to disclose insightful patterns, variations, or similarities associated to focus. 23 pts
Degree four
Organizes and interprets proof to disclose patterns, variations, or similarities associated to focus. 20 pts
Degree three
Organizes and describes proof in keeping with patterns, variations, or similarities associated to focus. 18 pts
Degree 2
Organizes proof, however the group is just not efficient in revealing patterns, variations, or similarities. 15 pts
Degree 1
Describes proof, however it isn’t organized and/or is unrelated to focus. zero pts
Degree zero
Lists proof, however it isn’t organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeConclusion 10 pts
Degree 5
Assembles a conclusion that could be a logical interpretation from findings. 9 pts
Degree four
Constructs a conclusion that’s logical from inquiry findings. eight pts
Degree three
Identifies a conclusion particularly from and responds particularly to the findings. 7 pts
Degree 2
Produces a basic conclusion that, as a result of it’s so basic, additionally applies past the scope of the inquiry findings. 6 pts
Degree 1
States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings. zero pts
Degree zero
States an illogical conclusion from findings.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeLimitations and Implications 10 pts
Degree 5
Insightfully discusses intimately related and supported limitations and implications. 9 pts
Degree four
Examines related and supported limitations and implications. eight pts
Degree three
Discusses related and supported limitations and implications. 7 pts
Degree 2
Presents related and supported limitations and implications. 6 pts
Degree 1
Presents limitations and implications, however they’re unsupported. zero pts
Degree zero
Presents limitations and implications, however they’re irrelevant.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeWriting 5 pts
Degree 5
The paper reveals a superb command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. four.5 pts
Degree four
The paper reveals a very good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the stream of communication. four pts
Degree three
The paper reveals a primary command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that influence the stream of communication. three.5 pts
Degree 2
The paper reveals a restricted command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the stream of communication. three pts
Degree 1
The paper reveals little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that trigger the reader to cease and reread elements of the writing to discern which means. zero pts
Degree zero
The paper doesn’t exhibit command of written English language conventions. The paper has a number of errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that trigger the reader issue discerning the which means.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeAPA
PRICE-I 5 pts
Degree 5
The required APA parts are all included with right formatting, together with in-text citations and references. four.5 pts
Degree four
The required APA parts are all included with minor formatting errors, together with in-text citations and references. four pts
Degree three
The required APA parts are all included with a number of formatting errors, together with in-text citations and references. three.5 pts
Degree 2
The required APA parts should not all included and/or there are main formatting errors, together with in-text citations and references. three pts
Degree 1
A number of APA parts are lacking. The errors in formatting exhibit restricted understanding of APA pointers, in-text-citations, and references. zero pts
Degree zero
There’s little to no proof of APA formatting and/or there are not any in-text citations and/or references.
5 pts
Complete Factors: 100
Directions
That is your Assessment and what follows is just a suggestion of concepts you might need to embody. Bolded objects are a should.
• The Assessment is to be concise and succinct.
• Critiques longer than 1000 phrases won’t be accepted.
• Critiques of 500 phrases might be applauded and critiques of 300 phrases or much less might be held as exemplars so long as they include the mandatory data and a considerate, insightful Assessment.
• Comply with APA format together with a title web page.
• Paragraphs must be organized in thought and be 5 to seven sentences in size.
• Assessment should include 1 quote (from a scholarly, peer-reviewed article and/or your textbook) See rubric or teacher for additional questions.
• Profitable completion of this Assessment is 100 factors.
Paragraph 1: Thesis sentence (consideration grabbing), title of the film, and fundamental theme or style, (Place your Assessment within the framework of the implications it has on healthcare that is smart to your viewers and alerts readers to your “take” on the film). In different phrases, Assessment it as a nurse and let your viewers know this context. Embody the thesis of the film (Description of the subject and total perspective, argument or goal) and your thesis concerning the film.
Paragraph 2: Summarize the film concisely. Bear in mind, you solely have 5-7 sentences right here.
Paragraph three: Essential Assessment of the content material (what was noteworthy, effectiveness or persuasiveness, the way it enhanced (or not) your understanding of the problem). Use tact in your criticism and proof on your assertions. You could use extra paragraphs right here however keep in mind to make your level succinctly.
Paragraph four: Focus on moral rules (i.e. autonomy, justice, beneficience, nonmaleficence) and moral approaches (i.e. deontology, utilitarianism) which have been evident within the film or relate to conditions within the film.
Paragraph 5: Conclusion: Restate your thesis. Embody your advice in addition to the viewers it’s best fitted to. Current a balanced argument concerning the film’s worth for the viewers. This may occasionally embody a timeline, a venue, or a inhabitants sort it might attraction to. You might be entitled to precise sturdy settlement or disagreement however stay skilled in voicing your opinion.
——-
Rubric
Wit Analysis Rubric for NU410
Wit Analysis Rubric for NU410
Standards Rankings Pts
This criterion corresponds to a Studying OutcomeTopic.
5 factors for NM410-CO2.
fifth degree
Determines an modern, targeted, and doable subject that addresses key points concisely.
four.5 factors
4th degree
Determines a manageable subject that addresses key factors.
four factors
third degree
Determines a targeted theme that addresses key factors.
three.5 factors
Degree 2
Identifies a subject that whereas doable, is simply too narrowly targeted.
three pts
Degree 1
Identifies a subject that’s far too basic and wide-ranging as to be doable.
zero pts
Degree zero
Doesn’t clearly establish a subject or identifies a subject that isn’t related to the project.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying Final result
Present Data, Analysis
