Posted: November 29th, 2022
Fact Pattern on the 5th And 6th Amendments
Fact Pattern on the 5th And 6th Amendments
W6: Fact Pattern on the 5th & 6th Amendments
Who Can Write My Dissertation or Research Paper? Best Writing Service!
Looking for reliable dissertation help or thesis writing? Our expert team of MPhil and PhD-qualified professionals provides top-notch online assistance for dissertations, research papers, and essays—free from errors, plagiarism, and hidden fees. We select each specialist based on their academic expertise, ensuring high-quality thesis writing and research paper support. Beyond writing, we offer personalized guidance, one-on-one doubt-clearing sessions, and free study resources. Whether you need instant dissertation help or long-term research paper support, our experts are ready to help you succeed.
A 19-year-old student, Sally, has been arrested by the police for possession of a small amount of marijuana while driving home from a college party. Assume that the police officer had probable cause to stop Sally for drunk driving. During the search of Sally's pockets incident to her arrest, the police find an unregistered handgun, a bag of prescription drugs issued to a woman named “Judy O’Heary, aged 74,” and $5,000 in cash in her car.
When the police confront her with these items, she says, “I need those pills because of my back pain. And, I have no idea where that gun came from.” The police officer then asks her why you need more than 350 tablets of painkillers, and she states, “You have no idea how bad my back hurts.”
Based on her statements about the pills, the police charge her with intent to sell and distribute prescription drugs. At trial, her attorney makes a motion to suppress the admission of the statements, arguing in relevant part that she made the statement without being given her Miranda rights. In response, the police argue that she made statements voluntarily and not under duress.
Discussion Assignment:
What Are Custom Dissertation and Thesis Writing Services? Just Essays?
Our custom dissertation help and thesis writing services meet your unique requirements. Unlike companies using pre-written content, we craft every dissertation, research paper, or essay from scratch based on your specific instructions and grading rubric. A subject-specialized writer will deliver a well-researched dissertation or thesis tailored just for you. Beyond essays, our academics and scholars offer PowerPoint presentations, cover letters, editing, tutoring, and business reports—comprehensive dissertation help and research paper support for all your academic needs.
The class is broken into 4 different roles.
YOU WILL ANSWER BY STATING YOUR DECISION AS IF YOU ARE THE JUDGE!
Can I Hire Someone for Dissertation Help or Thesis Writing to Score Top Grades?
Completing dissertations or research papers can be overwhelming, but expert dissertation help and thesis writing are smart ways to improve your grades. Our platform connects you with top-rated tutors in education, law, and nursing, offering high-quality research paper support and sample resources. Working with experienced professionals enhances your dissertation or thesis writing, boosting confidence in your coursework—at affordable fees. Sign up today for instant dissertation help, research paper guidance, and stress-free learning!
How do you think that the judge will rule on this motion to suppress? Does it matter that she was already under arrest at the time of her statements?
Please use your acting skills and stay in your role as you answer these questions. Be sure to provide detailed answers based on the facts and supported by the current case law. Have fun!
Please note that your answers have nothing to do with your personal feelings, thoughts or experiences with these issues. Your answers are to be based purely on the law, specifically precedent set by case law. Reviewing the Week 6 Content will be very helpful to you in finding relevant case law./.
Fact Pattern on the 5th and 6th Amendments
The 5th and 6th Amendments protect the criminal defendants and witnesses against self-incrimination and wrongful obtaining of evidence. During arrests, law enforcers must comply with the 5thAmendments to Miranda rights and inform the suspect of their rights and what happens when they fail to do so. The intention is to protect the suspect from self-incrimination. In this case study, it is clear that the law enforcer did not inform Sally of her rights, including the right to remain silent, how her words could be used against her, and the right to acquire an attorney.
If the officer had informed her of these rights, Sally would have been more aware not to explain to the officer the reasons for having an unregistered gun and the bag of un-prescribed drugs. A closer look shows that the police officer failed to comply with the 5th Amendment by confronting her and playing the role of the judge. Arguably, Sally panicked after being stopped by the police officer or was so intoxicated that she could not remember her right to remain silent and get an attorney rather than explain herself to the officer. Therefore, it was ethically and morally right for the officer to read out the Miranda rights to Sally.
It is essential, however, to take into account that the officer did not place Sally under any form of coercion to acquire information from her. He was performing his job of arresting a drunk driver who, out of carelessness and disorderly behavior, had a high chance of causing harm to themselves and society. Moreover, a law enforcer has the right to ask for details such as why one is driving drunk and the reason for having an unregistered weapon. However, this does not justify the fact that the officer, who, in this case, was sober and more aware of the situation, failed to read Sally, who, out of intoxication, may have been less aware of the going on with her rights.
The 6th Amendment protects criminal defendants by providing them with a compulsory process for obtaining witnesses. It is right to state that the evidence, including the unregistered gun and a bag of unprescribed pills, was obtained wrongfully against the 6th Amendment. However, the failure of the officer to read Sally does not imply that she should escape punishment. Her disorderly behavior, that it is, driving while drunk, is punishable, as she sid endanger herself, and r drivers, and pedestrians (Brensike, 2017). By the 6th Amendment, it would be unlawful to admit the evidence, that is the unregistered weapon and the bag pf in prescribed drugs in this trial were obtained through the wrong procedure (Nicholas, 2017). The failure to read Sally her laws led to self-incrimination.
However, there are exceptions to the sixth amendment, mainly if public safety is a concern. It is a matter of enormous concern that Sally has an unregistered weapon which raises concern about her intentions with the weapon. In addition, the bag full of money and unprescribed drugs also raises questions about whether she sells the drugs or not. Therefore, although the evidence was obtained the wrong way, it should be used during her trial. The officer and peers must be constantly reminded to read out criminal defendant laws in the future to avoid similar dilemmas.
References
Rappaport, J. (2017). The Structural Function of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel of Choice. The Supreme Court Review, (1), 117-156.
Brensike, E. (2017). "Disentagling Miranda and Massiah: How to Revive the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel as a Tool for Regulating Confession Law." B. U. L. Rev. 97(3), 1085-128.
Nicholas, A. (2017). A Right to a Remedy: The Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel and the American Indigent Defense Crisis.Criminal Law Review, 103 (7).