HC310 Herzing HIPAA Employee Training Program Presentation
Directions:
Half One: Training Plan
You’re to create a privateness coaching plan because the healthcare supervisor of a facility. Your coaching plan ought to embody:
Timeliness of coaching (when coaching must be accomplished by for brand new hires)
Who’s the coach?
How lengthy coaching can be (what number of days and the way lengthy every day)?
The strategy of coaching (in individual, on-line, and so forth…)
Who ought to have coaching?
How you’ll confirm attendance of trainees?
That is half one of many challenge. The coaching plan have to be submitted as a one web page APA formatted doc.
ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS
Half Two: Create the Training
For half two of the project, you’ll create a PowerPoint presentation used for the coaching. Examples of eventualities your workers would encounter, concerning every content material merchandise listed beneath, must be included. Observe correct formatting for a PowerPoint (at the least 22 level font, don’t overcrowd slides – about 7 traces to a slide). Use the notes part to point the script for every slide. The presentation must be a minimal of 10 slides together with a title slide and reference slide.
The content material of the coaching must be as follows:
What’s HIPAA and the way does it have an effect on me as an worker?
What’s the Discover of Privateness Practices, who will get a duplicate and what does it cowl?
What’s protected well being data?
How do sufferers acquire copies of data?
What’s the function of a confidentiality settlement and why do I’ve to signal one as an worker?
What’s included in a confidentiality settlement?
That is half two of the challenge. The coaching presentation have to be a minimal of 10 slides with speaker notes and be submitted as a PowerPoint presentation.
Half Three: Create a Confidentiality Settlement
For half three of the project, you’ll create a one-page confidentiality settlement utilizing the rules that you just simply offered in your coaching. The settlement should comprise acceptable spacing and signature traces. The confidentially agreements have to be submitted as a phrase doc.
Estimated time to finish: three hours
Rubric
HC310 Unit four Project – Privateness Training Plan
HC310 Unit four Project – Privateness Training Plan
Standards Scores Pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeAnalysis of Information
20.zero ptsLevel 5
Connects and extends information (information, theories, and so forth.) from one’s personal tutorial research/subject/self-discipline to civic engagement and to at least one’s personal participation in civic life, politics, and authorities.
18.zero ptsLevel four
Analyzes information (information, theories, and so forth.) from one’s personal tutorial research/subject/self-discipline making related connections to civic engagement and to at least one’s personal participation in civic life, politics, and authorities.
16.zero ptsLevel three
Begins to attach information (information, theories, and so forth.) from one’s personal tutorial research/subject/self-discipline to civic engagement and to at least one’s personal participation in civic life, politics, and authorities.
14.zero ptsLevel 2
Begins to determine information (information, theories, and so forth.) from one’s personal tutorial research/subject/self-discipline that’s related to civic engagement and to at least one’s personal participation in civic life, politics, and authorities.
12.zero ptsLevel 1
There Is a few proof that information is recognized (information, theories, and so forth.) from one’s personal tutorial research/subject/self-discipline that’s considerably related to civic engagement and to at least one’s personal participation in civic life, politics, and authorities.
zero.zero ptsLevel zero
There’s little to no proof that information is recognized (information, theories, and so forth.) from one’s personal tutorial research/subject/self-discipline that’s considerably related to civic engagement and to at least one’s personal participation in civic life, politics, and authorities.
20.zero pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeDefines Content material
20.zero ptsLevel 5
Demonstrates the flexibility to assemble a transparent and insightful downside assertion/thesis assertion/matter assertion with proof of all related contextual components.
18.zero ptsLevel four
Demonstrates the flexibility to assemble an issue assertion, thesis assertion/matter assertion with proof of most related contextual components, and downside assertion is sufficiently detailed.
16.zero ptsLevel three
Begins to reveal the flexibility to assemble an issue assertion/thesis assertion/matter assertion with proof of most related contextual components, however downside assertion is superficial.
14.zero ptsLevel 2
Demonstrates a restricted capacity in figuring out an issue assertion/thesis assertion/matter assertion or associated contextual components.
12.zero ptsLevel 1
Demonstrates the flexibility to clarify contextual information however doesn’t present an outlined assertion.
zero.zero ptsLevel zero
There is no such thing as a proof of an outlined assertion.
20.zero pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeRelationship to Analysis
20.zero ptsLevel 5
Evaluates supplies for scholarly significance and relevance inside and/or throughout the varied disciplines, evaluating them in response to their contributions and penalties.
18.zero ptsLevel four
Examines supplies for scholarly significance inside and/or throughout the varied disciplines to discover contributions in relation to vital questions.
16.zero ptsLevel three
Makes use of supplies within the context of scholarship to develop a foundationof disciplinary information and to boost and discover vital questions.
14.zero ptsLevel 2
Engages supplies with the intention and expectation of constructing topical and world information.
12.zero ptsLevel 1
Approaches supplies within the context of assignments with the intention and expectation of discovering proper solutions and studying information and ideas to show for credit score.
zero.zero ptsLevel zero
There’s little to no proof of engagement with exterior supplies utilized in a scholarly method.
20.zero pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeConclusion and Associated Outcomes
20.zero ptsLevel 5
Conclusions (penalties and implications) are logical and mirror knowledgeable analysis and the flexibility to put proof and views mentioned in precedence order.
18.zero ptsLevel four
Conclusions are logically tied to and mirror pupil’s knowledgeable analysis in precedence order and are clearly recognized.
16.zero ptsLevel three
Conclusion is logically tied to a variety of data and is recognized clearly.
14.zero ptsLevel 2
Conclusion is logically tied to data (as a result of data is chosen to suit the specified conclusion).
12.zero ptsLevel 1
Conclusion is inconsistently tied to among the data mentioned and oversimplified.
zero.zero ptsLevel zero
Conclusion is both not current, unclear, or doesn’t mirror the data offered.
20.zero pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeWriting
10.zero ptsLevel 5
The paper reveals a superb command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
9.zero ptsLevel four
The paper reveals a great command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling, and minor errors don’t impair the circulate of communication.
eight.zero ptsLevel three
The paper reveals a suitable command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that influence the circulate of communication.
7.zero ptsLevel 2
The paper reveals a restricted command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the circulate of communication.
6.zero ptsLevel 1
The paper reveals little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that trigger the reader to cease and reread components of the writing to discern which means.
zero.zero ptsLevel zero
The paper doesn’t reveal command of written English language conventions. The paper has a number of errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that trigger the reader issue discerning the which means.
10.zero pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeAPA
10.zero ptsLevel 5
The required APA components are all included with appropriate formatting, together with in-text citations and references.
9.zero ptsLevel four
The required APA components are all included with minor formatting errors, together with in-text citations and references.
eight.zero ptsLevel three
The required APA components are all included with a number of formatting errors, together with in-text citations and references.
7.zero ptsLevel 2
The required APA components usually are not all included and/or there are main formatting errors, together with in-text citations and references.
6.zero ptsLevel 1
A number of APA components are lacking. The errors in formatting reveal restricted understanding of APA pointers, in-text-citations, and references.
zero.zero ptsLevel zero
There’s little to no proof of APA formatting and/or there aren’t any in-text citations and/or references.
10.zero pts
Whole Factors: 100.zero
PreviousNext
HC310 Herzing HIPAA Employee Training Program Presentation
