HC310 Herzing HIPAA Employee Training Program Presentation
Instructions:
Part One: Training Plan
You are to create a privacy training plan as the healthcare manager of a facility. Your training plan should include:
Timeliness of training (when training should be completed by for new hires)
Who is the trainer?
How long training will be (how many days and how long each day)?
The method of training (in person, online, etc…)
Who should have training?
How you will verify attendance of trainees?
This is part one of the project. The training plan must be submitted as a one page APA formatted document.
ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS
Part Two: Create the Training
For part two of the assignment, you will create a PowerPoint presentation used for the training. Examples of scenarios your employees would encounter, regarding each content item listed below, should be included. Follow proper formatting for a PowerPoint (at least 22 point font, do not overcrowd slides – about 7 lines to a slide). Use the notes section to indicate the script for each slide. The presentation should be a minimum of 10 slides including a title slide and reference slide.
The content of the training should be as follows:
What is HIPAA and how does it affect me as an employee?
What is the Notice of Privacy Practices, who gets a copy and what does it cover?
What is protected health information?
How do patients obtain copies of records?
What is the purpose of a confidentiality agreement and why do I have to sign one as an employee?
What is included in a confidentiality agreement?
This is part two of the project. The training presentation must be a minimum of 10 slides with speaker notes and be submitted as a PowerPoint presentation.
Part Three: Create a Confidentiality Agreement
For part three of the assignment, you will create a one-page confidentiality agreement using the guidelines that you just presented in your training. The agreement must contain appropriate spacing and signature lines. The confidentially agreements must be submitted as a word document.
Estimated time to complete: 3 hours
Rubric
HC310 Unit 4 Assignment – Privacy Training Plan
HC310 Unit 4 Assignment – Privacy Training Plan
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Knowledge
20.0 ptsLevel 5
Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
18.0 ptsLevel 4
Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
16.0 ptsLevel 3
Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
14.0 ptsLevel 2
Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
12.0 ptsLevel 1
There Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline that is somewhat relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
0.0 ptsLevel 0
There is little to no evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline that is somewhat relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines Content
20.0 ptsLevel 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
18.0 ptsLevel 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
16.0 ptsLevel 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
14.0 ptsLevel 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.
12.0 ptsLevel 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.
0.0 ptsLevel 0
There is no evidence of a defined statement.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship to Research
20.0 ptsLevel 5
Evaluates materials for scholarly significance and relevance within and/or across the various disciplines, evaluating them according to their contributions and consequences.
18.0 ptsLevel 4
Examines materials for scholarly significance within and/or across the various disciplines to explore contributions in relation to important questions.
16.0 ptsLevel 3
Uses materials in the context of scholarship to develop a foundationof disciplinary knowledge and to raise and explore important questions.
14.0 ptsLevel 2
Engages materials with the intention and expectation of building topical and world knowledge.
12.0 ptsLevel 1
Approaches materials in the context of assignments with the intention and expectation of finding right answers and learning facts and concepts to display for credit.
0.0 ptsLevel 0
There is little to no evidence of engagement with outside materials used in a scholarly manner.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and Related Outcomes
20.0 ptsLevel 5
Conclusions (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect informed Assessment and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.
18.0 ptsLevel 4
Conclusions are logically tied to and reflect student’s informed Assessment in priority order and are clearly identified.
16.0 ptsLevel 3
Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information and is identified clearly.
14.0 ptsLevel 2
Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion).
12.0 ptsLevel 1
Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed and oversimplified.
0.0 ptsLevel 0
Conclusion is either not present, unclear, or does not reflect the information presented.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10.0 ptsLevel 5
The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
9.0 ptsLevel 4
The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling, and minor errors do not impair the flow of communication.
8.0 ptsLevel 3
The paper exhibits an acceptable command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
7.0 ptsLevel 2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
6.0 ptsLevel 1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0.0 ptsLevel 0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
10.0 ptsLevel 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
9.0 ptsLevel 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
8.0 ptsLevel 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
7.0 ptsLevel 2
The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
6.0 ptsLevel 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0.0 ptsLevel 0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.
10.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
PreviousNext
HC310 Herzing HIPAA Employee Training Program Presentation
