Posted: December 9th, 2022
Accounting Paper
Completion instructions
· Address all of the bullet points in the ‘Description and questions’ section below.
· Format: MLA format, 3 to 4 pages, excluding references and exhibits.
· The paper must be a single Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx).
· Best paper writer websites, Custom term paper writing service and Research papers owl essays - Professional help in research projects for students - Cite your sources. 100% no plagiarism!
· Use primary sources whenever possible. For example, if you find a newspaper article (a secondary source) that quotes a company press release (a primary source), try to access and use that company press release as your source.
Description and questions
In March 2011, David L. Sokol resigned from Berkshire-Hathaway.
Write a page paper - Describe the circumstances under which Mr. Sokol resigned. First, present the facts, by addressing the following questions:
· Who were the key players? Write a page paper - Describe their public reputations before Mr. Sokol resigned.
· Write a page paper - Describe the timeline of events of surrounding Mr. Sokol’s resignation, both chronologically and in terms of when information revealed publicly.
· Write a page paper - Describe Berkshire-Hathaway’s unofficial ethics policy.
After compiling the facts, consider the counterfactual – what could have happened but didn’t. Address the following questions:
· Explain why Mr. Sokol’s actions did or did not violate Berkshire-Hathaway’s unofficial ethics policy.
· Define a generic standard for what would have been “the right thing to do.” This standard is your opinion. For example, you might state, “I believe the company should have required its officers to do the following: …”
· Explain what behavior by Mr. Sokol and other key players either fell short of or met your standard.
· If these individuals’ behavior fell short of your standard, conjecture what they could have done differently that would have satisfied your standard. If these individuals’ behavior met your standard, conjecture what they could have done differently that would have fallen short of your standard.