Order custom papers, masters thesis and dissertation in 3 guided steps; human written!
Posted: February 23rd, 2022
We handpick every writer with care, ensuring they bring the perfect mix of academic qualifications and writing skills for top-notch results in essays, research papers, and dissertation help. Each one has a university degree, more than a third with Masters certification; they’ve tackled tough tests and training to excel in thesis writing and research paper assignments at any time. They’ll team up with you diligently, keeping things easy and stress-free as they relate to being immediate students. That’s what makes us the best assignment help website for "help me write my essay, research paper, or dissertation" for college coursework. Trust our team—professional research essay writers and editors—to deliver your dissertation or thesis writing within your grading criteria and deadline.
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Posting: Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. | 40 (40%) - 44 (44%) Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s).
Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Do You Offer Thesis Writing and Dissertation Help In Any Citation Style?No matter what citation style you need for your research paper or dissertation, our skilled writers have you covered! We provide thesis writing and dissertation help in formats like APA, AMA, MLA, Turabian, Harvard, IEEE, and more. We’re dedicated to customizing your order to the exact guidelines of your chosen style, ensuring it fits your unique academic needs—whether it’s a dissertation, research paper, or essay for a specific course. We’ve got the flexibility to make it work for you! No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current credible sources. |
35 (35%) - 39 (39%) Responds to most of the discussion question(s). Can I Change Instructions for Dissertation Help or Thesis Writing After Ordering?You can absolutely reach out to your academic writer using our simple, user-friendly chat feature. It’s there so you can add details, clarify instructions, or tweak adjustments for editing your research paper or dissertation according to your grading rubric—even after you’ve submitted "help me with thesis writing or dissertation help" and they’ve started working on your project. Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 credible references. |
31 (31%) - 34 (34%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references. |
0 (0%) - 30 (30%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s).
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only 1 or no credible references. |
|
| Main Posting: Writing | 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Written clearly and concisely.
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Further adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Written concisely.
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Written somewhat concisely.
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Posting: Timely and full participation | 9 (9%) - 10 (10%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts main discussion by due date. |
8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Posts main discussion by due date.
Meets requirements for full participation. |
7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Posts main discussion by due date. | 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post main discussion by due date. |
|
| First Response: Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. | 9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. | 7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth. | 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth. | |
| First Response: Writing | 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English. |
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in Standard, Edited English. |
4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
|
| First Response: Timely and full participation | 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Posts by due date. | 0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post by due date. |
|
| Second Response: Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. | 9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. | 7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth. | 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth. | |
| Second Response: Writing | 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English. |
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in Standard, Edited English. |
4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response: Timely and full participation | 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Posts by due date. | 0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post by due date. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||
Name: NRNP_6635_Week1_Discussion_Rubric
You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver
We’ve put together our writing team with care, choosing talented writers who shine in their fields. Each one goes through a tough selection process, where we look for folks with deep expertise in specific subjects and a solid history of academic writing. They bring their own mix of know-how and flair to the table, making sure our content hits the mark—packed with info, easy to read, and perfect for college students like you.
We don’t do AI-written essays or copycat work—everything’s original. Competitive pricing is a big deal for us; we keep costs fair while delivering top-notch quality. Our writers are some of the best out there, and we charge rates that stack up well against other services. This means you get stellar content without draining your wallet. Our pricing is straightforward and honest, built to give you real value for your money. That’s why students turn to us for high-quality writing services that won’t break the bank.
Academic integrity is at the heart of what we do. Every paper starts from scratch, with original research and writing tailored just for you. We write 100% authentic—no plagiarism research essays. Our strict quality control process includes scanning every draft with top tools like SafeAssign and Turnitin, so you get a similarity score and proof of originality. We’re obsessive about proper citation and referencing too, crediting every source to keep things legit. It’s all about giving you peace of mind with content that meets the highest standards.
When you decide to place an order with Dissertation Writer, here is what happens: