HPRO6715 Foundations of Health Promotion Assignment 1B.
This assignment follows directly on from Assignment 1A. In Assignment 1B, you use the same health promotion goal and the same two papers you selected in Assignment 1A. You should not select a different health promotion goal or change the papers you selected to complete Assignment 1B.
In Assignment 1B, you continue to critically examine the two interventions you selected in Assignment 1A
HPRO6715 Foundations of Health Promotion Assignment 1B.
Question 1.
State the topic you selected from the list provided
Provide the full citation details for the paper selected (Paper 1)
Simply copy and paste the text/screenshot of the complete abstract here – no editing is required. Do not worry about the effect this will have on your Turnitin score. This is not plagiarism and you will not be penalised for that.
Question 1.1. Reflecting on each of the following three principles of best practice for health promotion, 1) “Evidence-based Practice”, 2) “A commitment to equity”, and 3) “Planning for sustainability” describe whether the selected intervention in your paper addresses this principle and why you believe this is the case. Support your position on how it reflects each principle with relevant citations. The length of your response to each principle is to be 150 words ± 10%.
Question 1.2. For the intervention you selected, describe the intervention in terms of the 1)
“Sources of Behaviour”, 2) “Intervention Functions”, and 3) “Policy Categories” from the Behaviour Change Wheel1. The length of your response to each component of the intervention is to be 150 words ± 10%.
QUESTION 2 (ABOUT PAPER 2)
State the topic you selected from the list provided
Provide the full citation details for the paper selected (Paper 2)
Simply copy and paste the text/screenshot of the complete abstract here – no editing is required. Do not worry about the effect this will have on your Turnitin score. This is not plagiarism and you will not be penalised for that.
Question 2.1. Reflecting on each of the following three principles of best practice for health promotion, 1) “Evidence-based Practice”, 2) “A commitment to equity”, and 3) “Planning for sustainability” describe whether the selected intervention in your paper addresses this principle and why you believe this is the case. Support your position on how it reflects each principle with relevant citations. The length of your response to each principle is to be 150 words ± 10%.
Question 2.2. For the intervention you selected, describe the intervention in terms of the 1)
“Sources of Behaviour”, 2) “Intervention Functions”, and 3) “Policy Categories” from the Behaviour Change Wheel1. The length of your response to each component of the intervention is to be 150 words ± 10%.
QUESTION 3
Referring back to the health promotion goal you selected in Assignment 1A and reflecting on the responses you made to questions 1 and 2 above answer the following question. Which of the two interventions you selected do you think has the potential to have the greatest impact on the health promotion goal, and why? The length of your response is to be 400 words ± 10%.
References
1. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science. 2011/04/23 2011;6(1):42. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
Assignment 1B: Marking Rubric
====
Question 1: Paper 1
Topic: Increasing Physical Activity in Older Adults
Paper 1: Bauman, A., Bellew, B., Owen, N., Vita, P., & Brown, W. (2002). Getting Australia Moving: A report on physical activity from the National Public Health Partnership. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 26(3), 240-245. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2002.tb00684.x
Abstract:
Objective: To summarise the recent evidence on physical activity and health and to provide recommendations on the promotion of physical activity for health benefits.
Methods: A review of the literature and data from surveys of physical activity levels among Australians and of interventions designed to increase physical activity.
Results: Physical activity reduces the risk of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes and some cancers. Physical inactivity causes as many deaths in Australia as smoking. Most Australians are insufficiently active for health benefits. There is evidence for effective interventions to increase physical activity at the individual and population levels.
Conclusions: Physical activity should be promoted to the general public as an important means of reducing chronic disease risk. The challenge for health promotion is to promote population-wide increases in physical activity in the face of environmental and social factors that discourage it.
Question 1.1:
Evidence-based Practice: The selected intervention in Paper 1 addresses the principle of evidence-based practice. The paper presents evidence that physical activity reduces the risk of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes, and some cancers. The authors provide recommendations for promoting physical activity for health benefits based on a review of the literature and data from surveys of physical activity levels among Australians and of interventions designed to increase physical activity. They also highlight the need for effective interventions to increase physical activity at the individual and population levels, based on the available evidence (Bauman et al., 2002).
A commitment to equity: The selected intervention in Paper 1 addresses the principle of a commitment to equity. The authors note that most Australians are insufficiently active for health benefits, and that there are environmental and social factors that discourage physical activity. They recommend that physical activity be promoted to the general public as an important means of reducing chronic disease risk. To achieve population-wide increases in physical activity, they suggest that interventions should be targeted towards
===
Question 1.1 Fail
Pass Satisfactory Credit Good Distinction Excellent High Distinction
Outstanding
Criteria 0-3 4-7 8-11 12-15 16-20
Critical analysis of the intervention in relation to the stated principles of health promotion • Links to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks not made
• Information provided not linked to the set tasks
• Highlights relevance for none/few very principles • Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks that are satisfactory
• Information provided with some
links to the set tasks
• Highlights relevance for few principles • Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks that are somewhat clear
• Information provided somewhat linked to the set tasks
• Highlights relevance for several principles • Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks that are mostly clear
• Information provided mostly linked to the set tasks
• Highlights relevance for majority but not all principles • Demonstrates outstanding knowledge of relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks in understanding the topic
• Information provided clearly linked to the set tasks
• Highlights relevance for all principles
0-3 4-7 8-11 12-15 16-20
Understanding of how interventions target the stated principles of health promotion • Demonstrates little ability to critique selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to none/few very of the principles of health promotion • Demonstrates
satisfactory ability to critique selected interventions and the relevance of intervention
components to few of the principles of health promotion • Somewhat clear in the critiques of selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to several of the
principles of health promotion
• Mostly clear in the critiques of selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to majority of the
principles of health promotion
• Demonstrates outstanding ability to critique selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to all of the
principles of health promotion
0-1 2-3 4-5 6-7 8-10
Writing style • Responses are not within word limits
(±~10%)
• Poorly written, with limited use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources • Some responses are within word limits
(±~10%)
• Reasonably well written, with some use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources
• • Few responses are within word limits (±~10%) with some clearly above/below
• Adequately well written, with good use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources • Responses are mostly within word limits
(±~10%)
• Mostly well written, with excellent use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources • Responses are consistently within word limits (±~10%)
• Very well written, with outstanding use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources
Question 1.2
Criteria 0-6 7-14 15-23 24-31 32-40
Critical analysis of the intervention in relation to the sources of behaviour, intervention functions, & policy categories of the behaviour change wheel • Makes no/few links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks
• Makes no/few links to information articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention • Where appropriate makes links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks that are satisfactory
• Provides satisfactory information articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention • Where appropriate makes links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks
that are somewhat clear
• Is somewhat clear in articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention aims to achieve • Where appropriate makes links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks that are mostly clear
• Is mostly clear in articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention aims to achieve change in target in • Demonstrates outstanding knowledge and understanding of factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks
• Demonstrates outstanding ability to clearly articulate the target behaviour, how the intervention aims to achieve change in target
aims to achieve change in target in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks aims to achieve change in target in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks change in target in relation to relevant guidelines, theories,
and/or frameworks
relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks
0-1 2-3 4-5 6-7 8-10
Writing style • Responses are not within word limits
(±~10%)
• Poorly written, with limited use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources • Some responses are within word limits
(±~10%)
• Reasonably well written, with some use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources
• Few responses are within word limits (±~10%) with some clearly above/below
• Adequately well written, with good use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources • Responses are mostly within word limits
(±~10%)
• Mostly well written, with excellent use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources • Responses are consistently within word limits (±~10%)
• Very well written, with outstanding use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources
Question 2.1
Criteria • 0-3 • 4-7 • 8-11 • 12-15 • 16-20
Critical analysis of the intervention in relation to the stated principles of health promotion • Links to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks not made
• Information provided not linked to the set tasks
• Highlights relevance for • Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks that are satisfactory
• Information provided with some
links to the set tasks • Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks that are somewhat clear
• Information provided somewhat linked to the set tasks • Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks that are mostly clear
• Information provided mostly linked to the
set tasks • Demonstrates outstanding knowledge of relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks in understanding the topic
• Information provided clearly linked to the set tasks
none/few very principles • Highlights relevance for few principles • Highlights relevance for several principles • Highlights relevance for majority but not all principles • Highlights relevance for all principles
• 0-3 • 4-7 • 8-11 • 12-15 • 16-20
Understanding of how interventions target the stated principles of health promotion • Demonstrates little ability to critique selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to none/few very of the principles of health promotion • Demonstrates
satisfactory ability to critique selected interventions and the relevance of intervention
components to few of the principles of health promotion
• • Somewhat clear in the critiques of selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to several of the principles of health promotion
• • Mostly clear in the critiques of selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to majority of the principles of health promotion
• • Demonstrates outstanding ability to critique selected interventions and the relevance of intervention components to all of the
principles of health promotion
•
• 0-1 • 2-3 • 4-5 • 6-7 • 8-10
Writing style • Responses are not within word limits
(±~10%)
• Poorly written, with limited use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources • Some responses are within word limits
(±~10%)
• Reasonably well written, with some use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources • Few responses are within word limits (±~10%) with some clearly above/below
• Adequately well written, with good use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources • Responses are mostly within word limits
(±~10%)
• Mostly well written, with excellent use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources • Responses are consistently within word limits (±~10%)
• Very well written, with outstanding use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources
Question 2.2
Criteria • 0-6 • 7-14 • 15-23 • 24-31 • 32-40
Critical analysis of the intervention in relation to the sources of behaviour, intervention functions, & policy categories of the behaviour change wheel • Makes no/few links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks
• Makes no/few links to information articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention aims to achieve change in target in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks • Where appropriate makes links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks that are satisfactory
• Provides satisfactory information articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention aims to achieve change in target in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks • Where appropriate makes links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks that are somewhat clear
• Is somewhat clear in articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention aims to achieve change in target in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks
• • Where appropriate makes links to the factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks that are mostly clear
• Is mostly clear in articulating what the target behaviour is, how the intervention aims to achieve change in target in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks • Demonstrates outstanding knowledge and understanding of factors influencing the target behaviour in relation to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks
• Demonstrates outstanding ability to clearly articulate the target behaviour, how the intervention aims to achieve change in target in relation to relevant
guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks
• 0-1 • 2-3 • 4-5 • 6-7 • 8-10
Writing style • Responses are not within word limits
(±~10%)
• Poorly written, with limited use of peer-reviewed evidence and • Some responses are within word limits
(±~10%)
• Reasonably well written, with some use of peerreviewed evidence • Few responses are within word limits (±~10%) with some clearly above/below
• Adequately well written, with good use of peer-reviewed • Responses are mostly within word limits
(±~10%)
• Mostly well written, with excellent use of peer-reviewed • Responses are consistently within word limits (±~10%)
• Very well written, with outstanding use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources
other reliable sources and other reliable sources
evidence and other reliable sources evidence and other reliable sources
Question 3
Criteria • 0-3 • 4-7 • 8-11 • 12-15 • 16-20
Critical analysis of the interventions to achieve aims • Demonstrates little understanding of strengths & weakness of intervention to achieve aims
• Issues identified not relevant/ limited relevance to intervention aim, intervention functions, spectrum of health promotion interventions,
levels of prevention • Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of strengths & weakness of intervention to achieve aims
• Issues identified relevant to intervention aim, intervention functions, spectrum of health promotion interventions, levels of prevention • Demonstrates good understanding of strengths & weakness of intervention to achieve aims
• Issues identified somewhat relevant to intervention aim, intervention functions, spectrum of health promotion interventions, levels of prevention • Demonstrates mostly clear understanding of strengths & weakness of intervention to achieve aims
• Issues identified relevant to most but not all intervention aim, intervention functions, spectrum of health promotion interventions, levels of prevention • Demonstrates outstanding understanding of strengths & weakness of intervention to achieve aims
• Issues identified highly relevant to all intervention aim, intervention functions, spectrum of health promotion interventions, levels of prevention
0-3 4-7 8-11 12-15 16-20
Critical analysis of intervention
in relation to impact • Demonstrates
little
understanding of strengths & weakness of • Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of strengths & weakness of • Demonstrates good understanding of strengths & weakness of intervention to achieve aims. • Demonstrates mostly clear understanding of strengths & weakness of intervention to achieve aims. • Demonstrates outstanding understanding of strengths & weakness of
intervention to achieve aims.
• Issues identified not relevant/ limited relevance to intervention aim
• Links to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks not made intervention to achieve aims.
• Issues identified relevant to intervention aim
• Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks that are satisfactory • Issues identified somewhat relevant to intervention aim
• Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks that are somewhat clear • Issues identified relevant to intervention aim
• Where appropriate makes links to relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks that are mostly clear intervention to achieve aims.
• Issues identified highly relevant to intervention aim
• Demonstrates outstanding knowledge of relevant guidelines, theories, and/or frameworks in understanding the topic
• 0-1 • 2-3 • 4-5 • 6-7 • 8-10
Writing style • Responses are not within word limits
(±~10%)
• Poorly written, with limited use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources • Some responses are within word limits
(±~10%)
• Reasonably well written, with some use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources • Few responses are within word limits (±~10%) with some clearly above/below
• Adequately well written, with good use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources • Responses are mostly within word limits
(±~10%)
• Mostly well written, with excellent use of peer-reviewed evidence and other reliable sources • Responses are consistently within word limits (±~10%)
• Very well written, with outstanding use of peerreviewed evidence and other reliable sources
