Odysseus was a man who was identified for each his good and dangerous management qualities. Homer, the blind poet and the creator of ‘the Odysseus’ has portrayed Odysseus as an ambiguous character. Nevertheless, for my part and on this argument Odysseus have extra good management qualities than dangerous management qualities. All through this epic, readers can see that Odysseus made many management choices and took actions when it needs to be made. He was clever, truthful and fearless. Many incidents in Homer’s epic, factors out his intelligence, equity and fearlessness all through their journey.

All through Odysseus ‘journey to his residence in Ithaca, he has confronted many hardships and troubles which resulted within the dying of his males and the crew however he tried all that he can to guard and save his reckless males. He was very clever, that he took actions and made choices out of the blue which can profit the entire crew. As Homer States, “You’ll not allow us to sleep.

“Certain no man’s driving off your flock? No man has tricked you, ruined you? Out of the cave the mammoth Polyphemus roared in reply: ‘Nohbdy, Nohbdy’s tricked me. Nohbdy’s ruined me!

Whereas they bought trapped inside on the Cyclops cave, Odysseus introduces himself as ‘Nohbdy’ so when Cyclops screams, he would say ‘no one’ damage him. Odysseus made the Cyclops blind with a view to cease him from consuming all of his males which exhibits his intelligence and good management. Odysseus was truthful that he made choices to point out the Help to all his males regardless how robust they have been. Being truthful is likely one of the most vital management qualities as a result of if a chief will not be truthful, his followers will underestimate themselves pondering that they’re no good to the group and this will trigger greater issues.

To keep away from that Odysseus tossed a coin to select the lads to go as much as Cyclops and blind him with a spear. As Homer states, “now got here the time to toss for it: who ventured together with me? Whose hand might bear to thrust and grind that spike in Cyclops’ eye, when gentle sleep had mastered him? ” This incident from Cyclops cave exhibits his equity to his males and proves his good management. Odysseus was fearless all through the journey to his residence in Ithaca. All incidents occurred within the journey factors out he was keen to take threat for the protected and betterment of his crew.

He took Circe’s recommendation and went to the land of the useless to achieve knowledge and data and land of the useless is the place people who find themselves simply scared wouldn’t go as a result of Hades, God of the dying dominated over the land of the useless. He met the blind prophet Tiresias on the land of the useless the place he prophesized destruction amongst his ship and Odysseus refused to inform it to his males to not discourage his males. He additionally didn’t inform them about Circe’s prediction that he would be the solely survivor. Because it states, “Odysseus doesn’t inform his males of Circe’s final prophecy—that he would be the solely survivor of their lengthy journey.

In conclusion, Odysseus was a good chief and he was in a position to show his management qualities. Odysseus had what it takes to be a good chief as a result of he was clever, truthful and fearless and he supported and didn’t do something that might blemish his males’s braveness. He took threat and discover options to all the issues they confronted. He was emotionally robust and made his crew robust. He tried all that he can to guard his males and to not lose his males. Whereas they have been at Circe’s island and Cyclops cave and all by way of their journey he proved his good chief ship qualities.

References:

• Donlan, Walter. “Political reciprocity in Darkish Age Greece: Odysseus and his hetairoi.” Reciprocity in historic Greece (1998): 51-71.
• Donlan, Walter. “The custom of anti-aristocratic thought in early Greek poetry.” Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte H. 2 (1973): 145-154.
• Sarachek, Bernard. “Greek ideas of management.” Academy of administration journal 11.1 (1968): 39-48.
• Shay, Jonathan. “Ethical harm.” Intertexts 16.1 (2012): 57-66.
• POLK, GAIL CECELIA. “VERGIL’S PENELOPE: THE DIANA SIMILE IN” AENEID” 1. 498-502.” Vergilius (1959-) (1996): 38-49.
• Donlan, Walter. “Homer’s Agamemnon.” The Classical World 65.four (1971): 109-115.