Submission DeadlineMarks and FeedbackBefore 10am on:14/01/202220
Submission Deadline
Marks and Suggestions
Earlier than 10am on:
14/01/2022
20 working days after deadline (L4, 5 and seven)
15 working days after deadline (L6)
10 working days after deadline (block supply)
04/02/2022
Unit title & code
MAR029-Three Preparation for the Specialist Project
Task quantity and title
Assessment 2
Assessment kind
Proposal
Weighting of Assessment
75%
Dimension or size of Assessment
2,000 phrases
Unit studying outcomes
1. Exhibit the following data and understanding
Exhibit detailed understanding of the related data base which is subjected to vital appraisal.
2. Exhibit the following abilities and skills
Exhibit a capability to pick out and apply applicable analysis methodologies to gather information. This information will likely be analysed critically and intimately, to handle particular analysis questions successfully
What am I required to do on this task?
You’re required to submit a person proposal of two,000 phrases (+/- 10%) which must be based mostly in your chosen matter inside the selections offered for your course pathway.
The next factors must be noticed:
The Proposal should adhere to the phrase restrict.
We advise that you just keep away from writing in the first individual (“I”); quite the third individual is really useful (e.g. it could subsequently be recommended that…).
It’s possible you’ll embrace headings and subtitles and a contents web page in case you really feel this can enable you to to remain centered and create clearer sign-posting for the reader.
The very best Proposals will exhibit understanding of the key problems with your debate (derived out of your analysis) and possession of the work leading to a vital conclusion. The primary Assessment standards are listed in your Unit Handbook and Assessment grids can be found on BREO.
The next format/construction must be noticed for your proposal:
1. Introduction
a. Clarify your chosen Question Assignment
b. Set up the scope and limits of your Question Assignment, determine your Case Research or Research if relevant
c. Give contextual or background info
2. Main Theoretical Frameworks
a. Record your main frameworks and/or definitions
b. Give clarification on every, the related elements, the connection to your Project
Three. Main Themes
a. Record your main themes
b. Clarify every theme, give background if wanted
c. Clarify the connection to your Project and the way every theme helps handle the Question Assignment
four. Analysis plan (methodology)
a. Clarify how you plan to go about accumulating information/reviewing the literature to handle your Question Assignment (this could embrace an outline of your systematic literature overview course of and a desk of the sources that you’ve got reviewed as an appendix).
b. Clarify your anticipated sources of data
c. Clarify your main authors/works
d. Draw strains if attainable to your key themes
e. Spotlight areas you’re feeling could also be difficult, tough to finish, information which may be onerous to acquire, and many others.
5. Conclusion
a. Summarise your Project strategy
b. Draw the key factors collectively and take into account potential outcomes (implications for completely different stakeholders, e.g. coverage, observe, tutorial)
6. Bibliography – NOT OPTIONAL
a. The bibliography ought to comprise a wide range of sources with a minimal of 15 references utilized in the textual content, eight of which must be tutorial journal articles. Different sources might embrace books, commerce publications, information articles, business studies and many others.
b. Categorise your tutorial journal articles individually.
c. Quantity all references from 1 to 15 (or extra).
What do I have to do to move? (Threshold Expectations from UIF)
• Exhibit detailed understanding of the related theories and concepts related along with your given matter.
• Critically determine and analyse a broad vary of related materials (together with tutorial articles) and determine key points in relation to analysis design, strategies and findings inside the analysis context at hand.
How do I produce top quality work that deserves a great grade?
We will likely be filling this part in collectively at school on Click on or faucet to enter a date. ensure you have downloaded/printed out the Task Temporary and produce it to the session with you.
How does task relate to what we’re doing in scheduled periods?
The seminar preparation every week will let you begin the preparation for the proposal.
Energetic participation is important to any studying course of and particularly to the success of this essential unit. You’re anticipated to organize for the workshops by studying the assigned supplies upfront (supplies will often be made accessible on BREO).
Energetic participation by all college students is important if the studying outcomes are to be achieved. Your engagement is essential since all the workshops are linked to at least one one other. Lacking one workshop can have a ‘knock-on’ destructive impression on the subsequent workshops thus interfering with efficient studying.
It’s crucial that you just make ample notes and annotate key guided studying supplies equivalent to tutorial journal articles, in order that you’ll be able to shortly draw out from these supplies key proof to help your factors which is a key ability that will likely be examined on this task.
How will my task be marked?
Your task will likely be marked based on the threshold expectations and the standards on the following web page.
You should utilize them to guage your individual work and take into account your grade earlier than you submit.
third Class – 40-49%
Decrease 2nd – 50-59%
Higher 2nd – 60-69%
1st Class – 70%+
Interpretation of the Matter/Title and Goals/targets
(20%)
Matter has not been totally defined and the scope of the examine is unclear and missing in analysis. Interpretation of the matter is restricted.
Goals and Targets are clear, concise, related however exhibit a restricted perception into the matter.
Matter is defined, however the examine lacks focus. Extra effort might have been made to supply focus by means of analysis and a few interpretation of the matter. Goals and Targets are clear, concise, related and exhibit an affordable perception into the matter
Matter is nicely defined, related and based mostly on related analysis and good interpretation of the matter. Thought has been given to discovering a spotlight for the examine.
Goals and Targets are clear, concise, related and exhibit a great perception into the matter.
Matter is clearly outlined based mostly on thorough analysis and detailed interpretation of the matter. A lot thought has been given to the phrases of reference of the examine.
Goals and Targets are clear, concise, related and exhibit a deep perception into the matter.
Literature Evaluate and proposed themes
(20%)
Little or no proof of educational studying. Themes recognized with out referencing. Little or no point out of key authors/themes and many others. Little sense of any route that that will likely be helpful to pursue for the examine.
Restricted proof of educational studying. Extra depth of analysis required to determine applicable texts/authors. Some try and determine themes, however solely restricted at this stage.
Good proof of background studying. Important themes recognized and helpful authors/texts/journals talked about. Some proof of a route rising.
Very clear proof of thorough tutorial background studying. Key themes recognized and key authors/texts/journals listed. Already a transparent route for the examine is obvious.
Persuasion and Influencing
(20%)
Poorly argued with quite unconvincing conclusions. The reader could nicely doubt that the conclusions are legitimate.
The work will likely be moderately argued however the conclusions won’t be totally convincing from the proof introduced. The reader can have some doubt as to their validity.
The work will likely be soundly argued and the conclusions will likely be largely convincing however some doubt might stay in the reader’s thoughts as to their validity.
The work will likely be nicely argued and the conclusions will observe naturally from the proof introduced. Little question will likely be left in the reader’s thoughts as to their validity. A conclusion that contradicts perceived knowledge and is nicely justified will likely be notably welcomed.
Analysis Plan
(20%)
Weak analysis plan that’s incomplete in key areas of knowledge assortment and figuring out key authors/works. Restricted try and hyperlink to key themes.
An affordable analysis plan that makes an attempt to handle the job, however lacks some element and aptitude additionally in linking to key themes..
A great analysis plan that addresses the information assortment and key authors/works in a wise method, though higher hyperlinks to key themes could possibly be made. .
A extremely applicable analysis plan that addresses information assortment and key authors/works in a scientific and imaginative method. Clearly hyperlinks to key themes.
Proposal Type and Construction
Construction, referencing, writing, argument and presentation
(20%)
Weak essay writing abilities and restricted construction and a focus to element. Restricted and inconsistent referencing. Not utilizing Harvard System. Grammar & spelling poor.
Affordable construction and essay writing type that provides truthful credibility to the debate. Affordable referencing utilizing the Harvard System. Some errors in English/presentation.
Good construction and essay writing type that lends good credibility to the debate. Good and exact referencing utilizing the Harvard Reference System.
Good English and visible attraction.
Properly written and well-structured essay that’s utterly credible. Constant use of references. Excellent referencing all through utilizing the Harvard System. Wonderful grammar, spelling and visible attraction.
