Order custom papers, masters thesis and dissertation in 3 guided steps; human written!
Posted: May 15th, 2022
MGMT6002 Assignment Two Brief Page 1 of 4
ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Subject CodeandTitle MGMT6012ManagementPerspectives
Assessment AssignmentTwo:ManagementResearch
Individual/Group Individual
Length 2000 WordLimit
Learning Outcomes • Understandthenatureofnaturallyoccurringdataand
howthiscanbeobjectivelyanalysedtoinformyour
practiceandinfluenceyourbehaviour
• Analyseanddiscusshowthestructureandcharacteristics
oforganisationscaninfluenceandconstrainmanagers
andtheirdecisionmaking
• Identifytherangeoforganisational stakeholdersand
explainhowmanagerscanmanageeffectiverelationships
withthemtomotivate,manageandleadthemtoa
preferreddecisionoutcome
• Applyarangeoftechniquesandstrategiesto
communicateeffectivelytoaculturallydiverserangeof
stakeholders
Submission By23:59(SYDtime)FridayoftheendofModule6
Weighting 60%
TotalMarks 60 marks
Context:
The assessment suite in this subject is designed to provide students with a framework to
understand organisational behaviour, politics and the dynamics of the business
environment. The assessment suite aims to equip students with the necessary skills to
understand the constraints managers and emerging leaders face in developing strategies to
leverage advantages and overcome constraints and barriers in organisations.
Instructions:
Following from the first assignment, students will create a personal SWOT analysis and
comment on their fit with the organisation identified in their first assignment submission.
The second assignment should include:
• the use of three naturally occurring data (e.g. conversations, emails, corporate
artefacts that regularly occur, etc.);
MGMT6002 Assignment Two Brief Page 2 of 4
• assessment of personal strengths and weaknesses as viewed by self and others
(ensure you reflect on who is giving you what feedback, how you appear to be
progressing, and how you fit within the organisation where you work, or want to
work);
• a critical assessment of how you are placed or misplaced within the chosen
organisation; and
• a discussion of self-improvement for continuous improvement.
The report is to be limited to 2000 words, exclusive of formal document sections (i.e. title
page, executive summary, table of contents, references list, appendices, etc.), citations,
tables and graphs. Students should submit one file through Turnitin.
There are a number of forms the report could take. The exact form of the report will
depend on the additional research the student will undertake; students should aim for the
demonstration of deep learning, founded on reflection, rather than on getting any aspect of
the brief ‘right.’
Students should commence this assignment early, keep regular backups and ensure they
submit the correct, final version. Students should use this brief as the instruction set for the
assignment requirements. Additionally, the rubric below can be used to describe what
unacceptable, functional, proficient, advanced and exceptional assignments might look like
according to the criteria in the leftmost column of each row.
As this is a Masters level subject, students are expected to engage with high-quality
academic journal articles, using the Torrens University Library. Textbooks, Wikipedia and, in
general, anything that can be obtained through an open Google search page are considered
supplementary material, unbecoming of a postgraduate.
Students should begin their reflection, if they have not already previously done it, by
undertaking a Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator test. A free test that does not require
sign-up is available here: www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp. Another option is
the Gallup Strengths Assessment tool available that can be available by your facilitator.
MGMT6002 Assignment Two Brief Page 3 of 4
Learning Rubrics
There are numerous ways to interpret the assessment brief. This rubric should not be used as a prescription or tick-the-box list of
requirements but as a description of an amalgam of several possible interpretations and the standards they might take. The assessment will
be graded holistically, based on the criteria in the leftmost column. Your interpretation may not match the rubric exactly as you may extend
the requirements, using your initiative to demonstrate your mastery of the subject matter. Additionally, you may demonstrate elements
described in the Advanced column and still be graded ‘Functional’ for one or more of the criteria (the reverse trend is also possible). Higher
performing submissions will depend on wider reading, rather than on the rubric verbatim.
Absolutely! We prioritize fast delivery to ensure your dissertation, research paper, or thesis writing is completed well before the deadline. This gives you time for last-minute tweaks—like edits, corrections, or revisions—for dissertation help or essays. Need urgent homework or dissertation assistance? Reach out today and boost your chances of scoring top marks in your grading rubrics with our expert research paper and thesis writing support!
Assessment
Attributes Fail(Unacceptable) (Functional) Pass (Proficient) Credit (Advanced) Distinction High Distinction (Exceptional)
Effective
Communication (30%) Difficulttounderstandforaudience,no
logical/clearstructure,poorflowofideas,
argumentlackssupportingevidence.
Audiencecannotfollowthelineof
reasoning. Haslittlecommand of
organisationalfeatures. Usessome
cohesivedevicesbutthesemaybe
inaccurateorrepetitive. Information, arguments
andevidenceare
presentedinawaythatis
notalwaysclearand
logical. Lineofreasoning
is oftendifficulttofollow.
Maynotalwaysuse
referencingclearlyor
appropriately. Information, arguments
andevidencearewell
presented,mostlyclear
flowofideasand
arguments. Lineof
reasoningiseasyto
follow. Managesall
aspectsofcohesionwell. Information,
argumentsand
evidencearevery
wellpresented;the
presentationis
logical,clearand
wellsupportedby
evidence.
Demonstrates
culturalsensitivity.
Skilfullymanages
cohesionand
paragraphing. Expertlypresented;the
presentationislogical,
persuasive,andwell
supportedbyevidence,
demonstratingaclear
flowofideasand
arguments. Engages
andsustainsaudience’s
interestinthetopic,
demonstrateshigh
levelsofcultural
sensitivity Usesawide
rangeofstructureswith
flexibilityandaccuracy
demonstratinga
sophisticatedcontrolof
lexical features.
MGMT6002 Assignment Two Brief Page 4 of 4
Assessment
Attributes Fail(Unacceptable) (Functional) Pass (Proficient) Credit (Advanced) Distinction High Distinction (Exceptional)
Assessmentof
strengthsand
weaknesses(30%) NeglectsoneormoreelementsofaSWOT
analysis Completesallelements
ofaSWOTanalysis. Elaboratesallelements
oftheSWOTanalysis
beyondbasic
requirements. Elaboratesall
elementsofthe
SWOTanalysis
beyondbasic
requirementsand
includeselementsof
political,economic,
socialand
technological
factors. Demonstratesa
sophisticated
understandingofeach
elementoftheSWOT
analysisandintegrates
PESTanalysisfactors.
Articulationofresearch
principles(20%) Thefocusfortheresearchquestion(s)or
basisfortheprojectisunclear. The
rationalefortheresearchmethodologyis
inappropriatefortheresearch
question/project. Thefocusforthe
researchquestion(s)or
basisforprojectis
reasonable. The
rationalefortheresearch
methodologyis
appropriateforthe
research
question/project. Thefocusforthe
researchquestion(s)or
basisforprojectisclear.
Therationaleforthe
researchmethodologyis
statedandappropriate
fortheresearch
question/project. Thefocusforthe
researchquestion(s)
orbasisforprojectis
veryclear. The
rationaleforthe
research
methodologyis
comparedwith
alternativesandthe
chosenmethodis
appropriateforthe
research
question/project. Thefocusforthe
researchquestion(s)or
basisforprojectis
exceptionallyclear. The
Rationale forthe
researchmethodology
is comparedand
evaluatedagainst
alternativesandthe
chosenmethodis
appropriateforthe
research
question/project.
Consciousnessof
diversityinthecase
study (20%) Ignoresculturedifferenceinthecasestudy.
Failsto identifyowncultural filtersand
theirimpactonthinkingprocesses. Recognisescultural
differences. Identifies
culturalfiltersandimpact
onownthinking
processes. Identifies, analysesand
addressesdiversityand
workplaceissues.
Elaboratescultural
norms,valuesand
frameworks. Demonstratesan
understandingof
elementsimportant
tothehistory,
values,politics,
economy,beliefs
andpracticesof
membersofother
cultures
You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver
We’ve put together our writing team with care, choosing talented writers who shine in their fields. Each one goes through a tough selection process, where we look for folks with deep expertise in specific subjects and a solid history of academic writing. They bring their own mix of know-how and flair to the table, making sure our content hits the mark—packed with info, easy to read, and perfect for college students like you.
We don’t do AI-written essays or copycat work—everything’s original. Competitive pricing is a big deal for us; we keep costs fair while delivering top-notch quality. Our writers are some of the best out there, and we charge rates that stack up well against other services. This means you get stellar content without draining your wallet. Our pricing is straightforward and honest, built to give you real value for your money. That’s why students turn to us for high-quality writing services that won’t break the bank.
Academic integrity is at the heart of what we do. Every paper starts from scratch, with original research and writing tailored just for you. We write 100% authentic—no plagiarism research essays. Our strict quality control process includes scanning every draft with top tools like SafeAssign and Turnitin, so you get a similarity score and proof of originality. We’re obsessive about proper citation and referencing too, crediting every source to keep things legit. It’s all about giving you peace of mind with content that meets the highest standards.
When you decide to place an order with Dissertation Writer, here is what happens: