Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code Class Code Task Title Complete Factors
NRS-428VN NRS-428VN-O501 Benchmark – Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation 120.zero
Standards Share Unsatisfactory (zero.00%) Lower than Passable (65.00%) Passable (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Glorious (100.00%) Feedback Factors Earned
Content material 80.zero%
Presentation Primarily based on Teaching Work Plan and Supplier Suggestions 20.zero% Presentation will not be based mostly on a Teaching Work Plan. Presentation partially based mostly on a Teaching Work Plan. Documented supplier suggestions will not be built-in. Main facets are incomplete. Extra data is required. Presentation is usually based mostly on Teaching Work Plan and any documented supplier suggestions. Some facets are unclear. There are minor inconsistencies with Teaching Work Plan. Presentation is predicated on Teaching Work Plan and any documented supplier suggestions. All facets are usually in step with Teaching Work Plan. Presentation is clearly based mostly on Teaching Work Plan and any documented supplier suggestions. All facets are in step with Teaching Work Plan.
Presentation Primarily based on Teaching Work Plan and Supplier Suggestions Presentation Offers Individualized Schooling to Numerous Affected person Inhabitants in Acceptable Community Setting (C three.three Present individualized schooling to various affected person populations in a wide range of well being care settings.) 20.zero% Presentation doesn’t embody individualized schooling to a various affected person inhabitants in an acceptable group setting. Presentation is incomplete. Vital data for the recognized inhabitants is omitted or unclear. Some various attributes for that inhabitants are introduced; not all attributes are related to the inhabitants. The presentation doesn’t appear acceptable for the well being care setting. There are main inaccuracies. Extra data is required. Presentation gives basic data for the recognized inhabitants. Some various attributes for that inhabitants are introduced. Presentation is suitable to the group setting chosen. A minimum of one well being care setting the place this particular person schooling plan may very well be used has been proposed. There are some inaccuracies. Minor element or rationale is required for help. Presentation gives data for the recognized inhabitants and contains many various attributes for that inhabitants. Presentation is pertinent to the group setting chosen. Some extra well being care settings the place this particular person schooling plan may very well be used are proposed. Some element is required for readability. Presentation gives particular data that focuses on the recognized inhabitants and contains all various attributes for that inhabitants. Presentation is extremely related to the group setting chosen. Extra well being care settings the place this particular person schooling plan may very well be used are recognized and extremely related. The presentation demonstrates perception into offering particular person schooling to various affected person populations.
Presentation of Content material 40.zero% The content material lacks a transparent standpoint and logical sequence of knowledge. Consists of little persuasive data. Sequencing of concepts is unclear. The content material is imprecise in conveying a standpoint and doesn’t create a powerful sense of function. Consists of some persuasive data. The presentation slides are usually competent, however concepts could present some inconsistency in group and/or of their relationships to one another. The content material is written with a logical development of concepts and supporting data exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Consists of persuasive data from dependable sources. The content material is written clearly and concisely. Concepts universally progress and relate to one another. The mission contains motivating questions and superior organizers. The mission offers the viewers a transparent sense of the principle thought.
Group, Effectiveness, and Format 20.zero%
Structure 5.zero% The structure is cluttered, complicated, and doesn’t use spacing, headings, and subheadings to boost the readability. The textual content is extraordinarily troublesome to learn with lengthy blocks of textual content, small level dimension for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colours. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or daring formatting is clear. The structure exhibits some construction, however seems cluttered and busy or distracting with giant gaps of white house or a distracting background. Total readability is troublesome because of prolonged paragraphs, too many various fonts, darkish or busy background, overuse of daring, or lack of acceptable indentations of textual content. The structure makes use of horizontal and vertical white house appropriately. Generally the fonts are simple to learn, however in a number of locations using fonts, italics, daring, lengthy paragraphs, coloration, or busy background detracts and doesn’t improve readability. The structure background and textual content complement one another and allow the content material to be simply learn. The fonts are simple to learn and level dimension varies appropriately for headings and textual content. The structure is visually pleasing and contributes to the general message with acceptable use of headings, subheadings, and white house. Textual content is suitable in size for the audience and to the purpose. The background and colours improve the readability of the textual content.
Language Use and Viewers Consciousness (contains sentence building, phrase alternative, and many others.) 5.zero% Inappropriate phrase alternative and lack of selection in language use are evident. Author seems to be unaware of viewers. Use of primer prose signifies author both doesn’t apply figures of speech or makes use of them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language alternative (register) or phrase alternative are current. The author reveals some lack of management in utilizing figures of speech appropriately. Language is suitable to the focused viewers for essentially the most half. The author is clearly conscious of viewers, makes use of a wide range of acceptable vocabulary for the focused viewers, and makes use of figures of speech to speak clearly. The author makes use of a wide range of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and phrase alternative in distinctive and artistic methods which might be acceptable to function, self-discipline, and scope.
Rubic Print Format
Task of Course Code and Class Code Complete Variety of Factors within the Title
NRS-428VN NRS-428VN-O501 NRS-428VN-O501 Measurement Level – Community Teaching Plan – Community Presentation 120.zero sCriteria Share Unsatisfactory outcomes (zero.00 % ) Unsatisfactory outcomes had been obtained (65.00 % ) satisfies the necessities (75.00 % ) It is a good factor (85.00 % ) Exceptionally well-done (100.00 % ) Factors for Remark Earned sContent 80% (eighty %)
Presentation based mostly on the educating work plan and suggestions from suppliers a share of 20.zero % The presentation doesn’t observe the construction of a educating work plan. A portion of the presentation was based mostly on a Teaching Work Plan. Supplier enter that has been documented has not been carried out. Nearly all of the facets are nonetheless unfinished. There’s a want for extra data. The Teaching Work Plan, in addition to any documented supplier suggestions, are used to create the presentation. Some points are nonetheless up within the air. Inconsistencies with the Teaching Work Plan are solely minor in nature. The Teaching Work Plan, in addition to any documented supplier suggestions, function the inspiration for the presentation. Generally, all elements are in accordance with the Teaching Work Schedule. The presentation is clearly based mostly on the Teaching Work Plan in addition to any documented supplier enter that has been collected. All elements of the mission are in accordance with the Teaching Work Plan.
Presentation based mostly on the educating work plan and suggestions from suppliers Customized affected person schooling is offered in an acceptable group setting to a various affected person inhabitants (C three.three). To supply tailor-made affected person schooling to a different vary of affected person demographics in a wide range of health-care settings. a share of 20.zero % Individualized schooling for a various affected person inhabitants in an acceptable group setting will not be included within the presentation. The presentation is inadequate. There’s a vital quantity of knowledge lacking or unclear for the recognized demographic. It’s supplied some various traits of the inhabitants; nonetheless, not all traits are relevant to the inhabitants. There’s something about this presentation that doesn’t appear acceptable for a health-care setting. There are vital inaccuracies. There’s a want for extra data. On this presentation, basic data is offered for the recognized inhabitants. There are a number of traits for that demographic which might be introduced. The presentation is suitable for the group setting by which it’s being given. It has been proposed that this personalized schooling plan be employed in at the very least one health-care setting, with the potential for extra. There are some errors within the data. With the intention to present help, just a little element or rationale is required. The presentation gives data on the required group and covers a variety of qualities which might be distinctive to that demographic. The presentation is suitable for the group setting that has been chosen. Extra health-care contexts by which this personalized schooling plan may very well be employed are steered on this doc. For clarification, some specifics are required. The presentation delivers specialised data that’s targeted on the chosen group and covers all the various options which might be related to the recognized demographic. The presentation is extraordinarily related to the group setting by which it’s being given. Extra health-care contexts the place this personalized schooling plan may very well be carried out have been recognized and are thought-about to be extraordinarily related. The presentation reveals an understanding of present personalised schooling to sufferers from a wide range of backgrounds.
40.zero % of the content material is introduced in a visible method. There is no such thing as a distinct standpoint expressed within the textual content, neither is there a logical move of details introduced. There’s little or no persuasive materials on this part. The order by which ideas are introduced is ambiguous. The fabric is ambiguous when it comes to conveying a standpoint, and it fails to instill a powerful feeling of mission. There’s some persuasive materials on this part. Nonetheless, concepts could also be inconsistent of their association and/or their hyperlinks to 1 one other, even though the presentation slides are usually competent. A logical sequence of concepts and supporting data is used within the writing of the content material, and the textual content demonstrates unity, coherence, and cohesiveness all through. Included is persuasive materials gathered from respected organizations. The textual content has been ready in an easy and concise method. Concepts progress and work together with each other on a world degree. The mission options questions which might be each motivational and superior organizers. The essential thought of the mission is clearly communicated to the viewers by way of the mission.
Group, effectiveness, and format are all vital concerns. Structure accounts for 20.zero % of the full. 5% of the inhabitants The structure is chaotic and unclear, and it doesn’t make efficient use of spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance readability. The textual content is extraordinarily troublesome to learn with lengthy blocks of textual content, small level dimension for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colours. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or daring formatting is clear. The structure exhibits some construction, however seems cluttered and busy or distracting with giant gaps of white house or a distracting background. Total readability is troublesome because of prolonged paragraphs, too many various fonts, darkish or busy background, overuse of daring, or lack of acceptable indentations of textual content. The structure makes use of horizontal and vertical white house appropriately. Generally the fonts are simple to learn, however in a number of locations using fonts, italics, daring, lengthy paragraphs, coloration, or busy background detracts and doesn’t improve readability. The structure background and textual content complement one another and allow the content material to be simply learn. The fonts are simple to learn and level dimension varies appropriately for headings and textual content. The structure is visually pleasing and contributes to the general message with acceptable use of headings, subheadings, and white house. Textual content is suitable in size for the audience and to the purpose. The background and colours improve the readability of the textual content.
Language Use and Viewers Consciousness (contains sentence building, phrase alternative, and many others.) 5.zero% Inappropriate phrase alternative and lack of selection in language use are evident. Author seems to be unaware of viewers. Use of primer prose signifies author both doesn’t apply figures of speech or makes use of them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language alternative (register) or phrase alternative are current. The author reveals some lack of management in utilizing figures of speech appropriately. Language is suitable to the focused viewers for essentially the most half. The author is clearly conscious of viewers, makes use of a wide range of acceptable vocabulary for the focused viewers, and makes use of figures of speech to speak clearly. The author makes use of a wide range of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and phrase alternative in distinctive and artistic methods which might be acceptable to function, self-discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing (contains spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.zero% Slide errors are pervasive sufficient that they impede communication of which means. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are current, however they aren’t overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely freed from mechanical errors, though a number of could also be current. Author is clearly accountable for normal, written, educational English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, and many others., as acceptable to project and magnificence) 5.zero% Sources aren’t documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as acceptable to project and magnificence, with quite a few formatting errors. Sources are documented, as acceptable to project and magnificence, though some formatting errors could also be current. Sources are documented, as acceptable to project and magnificence, and format is usually appropriate. Sources are fully and accurately documented, as acceptable to project and magnificence, and format is freed from error.
Complete Weightage 100%
Mechanics of Writing (contains spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.zero% Slide errors are pervasive sufficient that they impede communication of which means. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are current, however they aren’t overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely freed from mechanical errors, though a number of could also be current. Author is clearly accountable for normal, written, educational English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, and many others., as acceptable to project and magnificence) 5.zero% Sources aren’t documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as acceptable to project and magnificence, with quite a few formatting errors. Sources are documented, as acceptable to project and magnificence, though some formatting errors could also be current. Sources are documented, as acceptable to project and magnificence, and format is usually appropriate. Sources are fully and accurately documented, as acceptable to project and magnificence, and format is freed from error.
Complete Weightage 100%

Published by

Write

View all posts