NRS428VN Benchmark – Policy Brief Assignment
Permalink: https://nursingpapermills.com/nrs428vn-benchma…brief-assignment/
Analysis public well being points on the “Local weather Change” or “Subjects and Points” pages of the American Public Well being Affiliation (APHA) web site. Examine a public well being subject associated to an environmental subject inside the U.S. well being care supply system and study its impact on a selected inhabitants. NRS428VN Benchmark – Policy Brief Assignment
Write a 750-1,00Zero-word coverage temporary that summarizes the difficulty, explains the impact on the inhabitants, and proposes an answer to the difficulty.
Observe this define when writing the coverage temporary:
Describe the coverage well being subject. Embody the next info: (a) what inhabitants is affected, (b) at what degree does it happen (native, state, or nationwide), and (c) proof in regards to the points supported by assets.
Create an issue assertion.
Present ideas for addressing the well being subject attributable to the present coverage. Describe what steps are required to provoke coverage change. Embody crucial stakeholders (authorities officers, administrator) and funds or funding concerns, if relevant.
Talk about the influence on the well being care supply system.
Embody three peer-reviewed sources and two different sources to Help the coverage temporary.
Put together this task in line with the rules discovered within the APA Type Information, positioned within the Pupil Success Middle.
This task makes use of a rubric. Please assessment the rubric previous to starting the task to grow to be accustomed to the expectations for profitable completion.
You might be required to submit this task to LopesWrite. A hyperlink to the LopesWrite technical Help articles is positioned in Course Supplies if you happen to want help.
Benchmark Data
Registered Nurse to Bachelor of Science in Nursing
The benchmark assesses the next competencies:
1.four Take part in well being care coverage growth to affect nursing follow and well being care.
Rubric
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Whole Factors
NRS-428VN NRS-428VN-O503 Benchmark – Policy Brief 120.Zero
Standards Proportion Unsatisfactory (Zero.00%) Much less Than Passable (80.00%) Passable (88.00%) Good (92.00%) Glorious (100.00%) Feedback Factors Earned
Content material 80.Zero%
Description of Policy Well being Challenge 20.Zero% Description of the coverage subject is omitted. An incomplete description of the coverage subject is offered. The origin of this coverage is unclear. There isn’t a proof that this coverage creates a well being subject, or that it is a matter for the inhabitants chosen. The extent at which the difficulty happens has not been recognized. There are main inaccuracies. An outline of the coverage subject is summarized. The origin of the coverage is described, however it’s unclear why the coverage creates a well being subject for the inhabitants chosen. The extent at which the difficulty happens is recognized. There are some inaccuracies. Extra info and rationale are wanted. A common description of the coverage subject is offered. The origin of the coverage is described and a correlation between the coverage and the well being subject for the inhabitants chosen is established. The extent at which this happens is mentioned. Some rationale or element is required for readability. An in depth description of the coverage subject is offered. The origin of the coverage is described and a powerful correlation between the coverage and the well being subject for the inhabitants chosen is established. The extent at which this happens is mentioned. Robust rationale and proof are provided for Help. Perception into the coverage well being subject is demonstrated.
Drawback Assertion 20.Zero% An issue assertion shouldn’t be included. An issue assertion is current however lacks element or is incomplete. Topic information is unclear or inconsistent. An issue assertion is current. Some topic information is clear.r An issue assertion is included, and topic information is competent. An issue assertion is totally developed with supporting particulars. NRS428VN Benchmark – Policy Brief Assignment
Ideas for Addressing the Policy Well being Challenge (C1.four) 20.Zero% Ideas for addressing the coverage well being subject will not be included. Ideas for addressing the coverage well being subject are incomplete. Ideas don’t embody all task standards. The ideas don’t Help coverage change for the coverage well being subject. Ideas for addressing the difficulty are current. Some topic information is clear. Most task standards are met. The ideas usually define steps for coverage change. Extra info or proof is required. Ideas for addressing the difficulty are current, and topic information is competent. All task standards are met. The ideas define steps for coverage change. Minor element is required for readability. Ideas for addressing the difficulty are totally developed with supporting particulars. All task standards are met and well-supported. The ideas are well-supported and provide clear steps for initiating coverage change.
Impression on Well being Care Supply System 20.Zero% A dialogue on the influence on the well being care supply system shouldn’t be included. A dialogue on the influence on the well being care supply system is current however lacks element or is incomplete. Topic information is unclear or inconsistent. A dialogue on the influence on the well being care supply system is current. Some topic information is clear. A dialogue on the influence on the well being care supply system is current, and topic information is competent. A dialogue on the influence on the well being care supply system is totally developed with supporting particulars.
Group, Effectiveness, and Format 20.Zero%
Thesis Improvement and Objective 5.Zero% Paper lacks any discernible total objective or organizing declare. Thesis is insufficiently developed or obscure. Objective shouldn’t be clear. Thesis is clear and acceptable to objective. Thesis is evident and forecasts the event of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and acceptable to the aim. Thesis is complete and incorporates the essence of the paper. Thesis assertion makes the aim of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Building 5.Zero% Assertion of objective shouldn’t be justified by the conclusion. The conclusion doesn’t Help the declare made. Argument is incoherent and makes use of noncredible sources. Ample justification of claims is missing. Argument lacks constant unity. There are apparent flaws within the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly however could have just a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, however not totally, helps the aim. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument exhibits logical development. Methods of argumentation are evident. There’s a easy development of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive declare in a particular and compelling method. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (contains spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.Zero% Floor errors are pervasive sufficient that they impede communication of that means. Inappropriate phrase selection or sentence development is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language selection (register) or phrase selection are current. Sentence construction is appropriate however not diverse. Some mechanical errors or typos are current, however they aren’t overly distracting to the reader. Appropriate and diverse sentence construction and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is essentially freed from mechanical errors, though just a few could also be current. The author makes use of quite a lot of efficient sentence buildings and figures of speech. Author is clearly accountable for customary, written, educational English.
Paper Format (use of acceptable type for the main and task) 2.Zero% Template shouldn’t be used appropriately, or documentation format isn’t adopted accurately. Applicable template is used, however some components are lacking or mistaken. An absence of management with formatting is clear. Applicable template is used. Formatting is appropriate, though some minor errors could also be current. Applicable template is totally used. There are just about no errors in formatting type. All format components are appropriate.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, and so forth., as acceptable to task and magnificence) three.Zero% Sources will not be documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as acceptable to task and magnificence, with quite a few formatting errors. Sources are documented, as acceptable to task and magnificence, though some formatting errors could also be current. Sources are documented, as acceptable to task and magnificence, and format is usually appropriate. Sources are utterly and accurately documented, as acceptable to task and magnificence, and format is freed from error.
Whole Weightage 100% NRS428VN Benchmark – Policy Brief Assignment
