NRS428VN Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper
Permalink: https://nursingpapermills.com/nrs428vn-communi…experience-paper/
The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon College meets the necessities for scientific competencies as outlined by the Fee on Collegiate Nursing Training (CCNE) and the American Affiliation of Faculties of Nursing (AACN), utilizing nontraditional experiences for practising nurses. These experiences come within the type of direct and oblique care experiences during which licensed nursing college students have interaction in studying throughout the context of their hospital group, particular care self-discipline, and native communities. NRS428VN Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper
Be aware: That is a person task. In 1,500-2,00zero phrases, describe the educating expertise and focus on your observations. The written portion of this task ought to embrace:
Abstract of educating plan
Epidemiological rationale for matter
Analysis of educating expertise
Community response to educating
Areas of strengths and areas of enchancment
Put together this task in line with the APA pointers discovered within the APA Model Information, situated within the Scholar Success Heart.
This task makes use of a rubric. Please overview the rubric previous to starting the task to change into accustomed to the expectations for profitable completion.
You might be required to submit this task to LopesWrite. A hyperlink to the LopesWrite technical help articles is situated in Course Supplies should you want help.
Rubric
Course Code Class Code Project Title Complete Factors
NRS-428VN NRS-428VN-O503 Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper 100.zero
Standards Proportion Unsatisfactory (zero.00%) Much less Than Passable (65.00%) Passable (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Glorious (100.00%) Feedback Factors Earned
Content material 80.zero%
Complete Abstract of Teaching Plan 15.zero% Abstract of neighborhood educating plan is omitted. Abstract of neighborhood educating plan is incomplete. Total, the educating plan is unclear. Abstract of neighborhood educating plan is obtainable, however some parts are obscure. Some rationale or proof is required for readability and help. Community educating plan is evident with an in depth abstract of every element. Minor rationale is required for readability or help. Focus of neighborhood educating is evident, according to neighborhood educating plan, detailed, and properly supported. The presentation demonstrates a capability to create efficient educating plans relative to a inhabitants.
Epidemiological Rationale for Matter 15.zero% Epidemiological rationale for the subject is omitted. Epidemiological rationale is unclear or incorrect. Epidemiological rationale is summarized and gives some help for the subject. Extra info or proof is required for help. Epidemiological rationale is supplied and gives common help for the subject. Some element is required for readability. Robust epidemiological rationale is supplied and demonstrates help for the subject offered.
Analysis of Teaching Experience 20.zero% Analysis of educating expertise is omitted or incomplete. Analysis of educating expertise is unclear or underdeveloped. The narrative just isn’t written in a fashion that evaluates the expertise. Analysis of educating expertise is summarized. Some features are obscure. Extra element is required to totally illustrate an Assessment of the expertise. Analysis of the educating expertise is usually offered. Some element is required for readability. A complete analysis of educating expertise is offered. Perception into self-appraisal in regard to educating is demonstrated.
Community Response to Teaching Offered 15.zero% Community response to educating is omitted. Community response to educating is partially summarized. Extra info is required. A abstract of the neighborhood response to educating is offered. Some areas are unclear. Extra info is required for help or readability. An outline of neighborhood response to educating is usually offered. Some info is required for help or readability. An in depth description of neighborhood response to educating is offered.
Areas of Energy and Enchancment 15.zero% Areas of energy and enchancment are omitted. Areas of energy and enchancment are partially mentioned. Areas of energy and enchancment are typically mentioned. Areas of energy and enchancment are mentioned. Areas of energy and enchancment are completely mentioned. The writer demonstrates perception into private strengths and areas the place enchancment could be helpful.
Group, Effectiveness, and Format 20.zero%
Thesis Improvement and Objective 5.zero% Paper lacks any discernible general goal or organizing declare. Thesis is insufficiently developed or obscure. Objective just isn’t clear. Thesis is obvious and acceptable to goal. Thesis is evident and forecasts the event of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and acceptable to the aim. Thesis is complete and accommodates the essence of the paper. Thesis assertion makes the aim of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Development 5.zero% Assertion of goal just isn’t justified by the conclusion. The conclusion doesn’t help the declare made. Argument is incoherent and makes use of noncredible sources. Adequate justification of claims is missing. Argument lacks constant unity. There are apparent flaws within the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly however might have a number of inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, however not completely, helps the aim. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument reveals logical development. Methods of argumentation are evident. There’s a clean development of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive declare in a particular and compelling method. All sources are authoritative. NRS428VN Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper
Mechanics of Writing (contains spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.zero% Floor errors are pervasive sufficient that they impede communication of which means. Inappropriate phrase alternative or sentence building is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language alternative (register) or phrase alternative are current. Sentence construction is right however not diverse. Some mechanical errors or typos are current, however they don’t seem to be overly distracting to the reader. Right and diverse sentence construction and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is basically freed from mechanical errors, though a number of could also be current. The author makes use of quite a lot of efficient sentence constructions and figures of speech. Author is clearly in charge of customary, written, tutorial English.
Paper Format (use of acceptable model for the key and task) 2.zero% Template just isn’t used appropriately, or documentation format isn’t adopted accurately. Applicable template is used, however some parts are lacking or mistaken. An absence of management with formatting is obvious. Applicable template is used. Formatting is right, though some minor errors could also be current. Applicable template is absolutely used. There are nearly no errors in formatting model. All format parts are right.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, and many others., as acceptable to task and elegance) three.zero% Sources usually are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as acceptable to task and elegance, with quite a few formatting errors. Sources are documented, as acceptable to task and elegance, though some formatting errors could also be current. Sources are documented, as acceptable to task and elegance, and format is generally right. Sources are fully and accurately documented, as acceptable to task and elegance, and format is freed from error.
Complete Weightage 100%
