NRSG372: Chronic Illness and Disability
NRSG372_ Assessment 1: Written Assignment_ © Australian Catholic College 2021 _ Web page 1 of four
ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
Assessment Title Written Project
Objective This Assessment will present college students with a chance to have interaction with a
well being client, to realize perception into the impression persistent sickness and/or incapacity
has on the customers life, and to plan person-centered care in partnership with
a client. College students may have the chance to use particular frameworks to
reveal important considering, medical reasoning and the rules of caring for
folks with a persistent sickness or incapacity. Written consent out of your interviewee
to conduct your interview is required.
Stream A Due Date Wednesday, 24th March 2021
Stream B Due Date Wednesday, fifth Might, 2021
Time Due 9am
Weighting 50%
Size 1750 phrases (+/- 10%; consists of intext citations, excludes reference listing)
Assessment Rubric Appendix A of the NRSG372 unit define
LEO Useful resource Written Project Unpacking video, NRSG372 LEO Assessment tile
LOs Assessed LO1, LO2, LO3, LO6
Job You’re required to conduct a cellphone or video name interview with an actual particular person in
your group who has a persistent sickness or incapacity to find the impression this
has on their life. You will want to organize to your interview. McGrath,
Palmgren & Liljedahl (2019) recommend twelve steps for conducting analysis
interviews; this text is linked on the NRSG372 studying listing for Module one.
Establish two (2) care priorities to your interviewee. Current every precedence utilizing
the Levett-Jones (2018) Medical Reasoning Cycle, finishing the cycle for every
precedence as outlined within the paragraph construction part of this doc. For every
precedence, determine and rationalise the place the particular person sits on the Roper-Logan
Tierney (RLT) mannequin of nursing independence to dependence continuum. It’s
anticipated that acceptable evidence-based literature will probably be used to Help your
project.
Consent Type You will want to realize written consent out of your interviewee PRIOR to conducting
your interview and inform your interviewee they might be known as at random by the
LIC to verify consent. There should be proof that you’ve got interviewed (through
cellphone or video name) an actual particular person in your group, demonstrated by the
consent kind and distinctive circumstances outlined in your essay. If there may be
proof that college students haven’t performed a real interview an NN grade for
the Assessment will probably be awarded.
AssignmentTutorOnline
NRSG372: Chronic Illness and Disability
NRSG372_ Assessment 1: Written Assignment_ © Australian Catholic College 2021 _ Web page 2 of four
Security Confidentiality should be maintained. It’s essential to de-identify your interviewee in
your paper, by use of a pseudonym, and state this clearly in your paper. Any
identifiable location, organisation, or office should be deidentified.
This Assessment doesn’t encourage you to diagnose situations or recommend
therapies to your interviewee.
These below 18 years of age, carers, or at present enrolled college students at Australian
Catholic College, are to not be interviewed.
College students are to not strategy strangers for interviews, or to place themselves into
conditions of danger. Please concentrate on the impression of conducting an interview on
your interviewee. Ought to your interviewee turn out to be upset, please end the
interview at that time, and contact the LIC for additional recommendation.
Paragraph Construction Introduction: Introduce the interviewee with a pseudonym (and clearly state it’s
a pseudonym), their well being standing and situation(s), introduce your two care
priorities, define the frameworks used, ending with targets related to every
care precedence with a deal with affected person centred care. (max 10% of phrase depend).
Para 1: What’s your first precedence? What their wellbeing standing and situation(s), current your two consideration
wants, format the programs utilized, getting carried out with goals associated with every
care want with an consideration on understanding centered consideration. (max 10% of phrase verify).
Para 1: What’s your major objective? What information have you ever used to indicate up at
this? The place on the RLT reliance/freedom continuum (through
gear, medicines, or mediations) Be express and make clear the necessity in
profundity right here.
Para 2: What is going to the outcomes be on the off probability that you do not tackle this as your want?
That is the place the place it’s worthwhile to legitimize this being your want use proof to Help.
Para three: What’s your goal because the attendant similar to the distinguished consideration want?
Moreover, what is going to your intercession be? info have you ever used to reach at
this? The place on the RLT dependence/independence continuum (by the use of
tools, therapies, or interventions) Be particular and clarify the precedence in
depth right here.
Para 2: What is going to the results be if you don’t tackle this as your precedence?
That is the place it’s worthwhile to justify this being your priority- use proof to Help.
Para three: What’s your objective because the nurse in relation to the recognized care precedence?
And what is going to your intervention be? You will want to substantiate this with proof
and a rationale and convey within the NSQHS partnering with customers commonplace.
Para four: What’s your second precedence? What info have you ever used to reach at
this? The place on the RLT dependence/independence continuum (by the use of
tools, therapies, or interventions) Be particular and clarify the precedence in
depth right here.
Para 5: What is going to the results be if you don’t tackle this as your precedence?
That is the place it’s worthwhile to justify this being your priority- use proof to Help.
Para 6: What’s your objective because the nurse in relation to the recognized care precedence?
And what is going to your intervention be? You will want to substantiate this with proof
and a rationale and convey within the NSQHS partnering with customers commonplace.
Conclusion: What have you ever carried out all through the paper? What are the subsequent
steps? Analysis of the interventions will reveal what? (max 10% of phrase
depend).
Submission
NRSG372: Chronic Illness and Disability
NRSG372_ Assessment 1: Written Assignment_ © Australian Catholic College 2021 _ Web page three of four
1. Consent Type is to be submitted to the “Assessment One Consent Type”
LEO dropbox in your campus tile. Please make sure you undergo the
dropbox assigned to your stream.
2. Written project is to be submitted to the “Assessment One Written
Project” LEO dropbox in your campus tile. Please make sure you submit
to the dropbox assigned to your stream.
FORMATTING
File format .doc or .docx (not .pdf recordsdata)
Margins 2.54cm, all sides
Font and measurement 11-point Calibri or Arial
Spacing 1.5 spacing
Paragraph Aligned to left margin, indent first line of every paragraph 1.27cm
Title Web page Not for use
Stage 1 Heading Centered, daring, capitalize every phrase (14-point Calibri or Arial)
Stage 2 Headings Not for use
Construction Introduction, principal paragraphs, conclusion, reference listing
Direct quotes At all times require web page quantity. Not more than 10% of WC in direct quotes
Header Web page quantity prime proper nook (9 level Calibri or Arial)
Footer Identify – Scholar Quantity – Ax1 – NRG372 – 2021 (in 9 level Calibri or Arial)
REFRENCING
Referencing Model APA seventh
Minimal References A minimal of 17 top quality sources are for use.
Age of References Revealed within the final 5 years as this space of data is quickly growing
Listing Heading “References” is centered, daring, on a brand new web page. (in 14 level Calibri or Arial)
Alphabetical Order References are organized alphabetically by writer household identify
Hanging Indent Second and subsequent strains of a reference have a dangling indent
DOI Introduced as useful hyperlink
Spacing Double spacing your complete reference listing, each inside and between entries
NRSG372: Chronic Illness and Disability
NRSG372_ Assessment 1: Written Assignment_ © Australian Catholic College 2021 _ Web page four of four
ADMINISTRATION
Late Penalties Late penalties will probably be utilized from 9:01am on the due date, incurring 5% penalty
of the utmost marks obtainable as much as a most of 15%. Assessment duties
acquired greater than three calendar days after the due or prolonged date will
obtain suggestions however is not going to not be allotted a mark.
Penalty Timeframe Penalty Marks Deducted
09:01am Wednesday to 9am Thursday 5% penalty 5 marks
09:01am Thursday to 9am Friday 10% penalty 10 marks
09:01am Friday to 9am Saturday 15% penalty 15 marks
Acquired after 09:01 Saturday No mark allotted
Instance:
An project is submitted 12 hours late and is initially marked at 60 out of
100. A 5% penalty is utilized (5% of 100 is 5 marks). Subsequently, the scholar
receives 55 out of 100 as a ultimate mark.
Return of Marks Marks will probably be usually returned in three weeks; if this isn’t achievable, you’ll
be notified through your campus LEO discussion board.
Ultimate Project Marks for the ultimate Assessment (Assessment two) of NRSG372 will probably be withheld
till after grade ratification and grade launch.
Assessment template mission knowledgeable by ACU scholar boards, ACU Librarians and the Educational Expertise Unit.
