Legislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement – NURS5050 Task
To Put together:
Choose a invoice that has been proposed utilizing the congressional web sites offered within the Studying Assets.
The Task: (1-page Legislation Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement)
Make sure you add a title web page, an introduction, function assertion, and a conclusion. That is an APA paper.
Half 1: Legislation Grid
Primarily based on the health-related invoice (proposed, not enacted) you chose, full the Legislation Grid Template. Make sure you deal with the next:
· Decide the legislative intent of the invoice you have got reviewed.
· Establish the proponents/opponents of the invoice.
· Establish the goal populations addressed by the invoice.
· The place within the course of is the invoice presently? Is it in hearings or committees?
Half 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement
Primarily based on the health-related invoice you chose, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the next:
· Advocate a place for the invoice you chose and write testimony in help of your place.
· Clarify how the social determinants of revenue, age, training, or gender have an effect on this laws.
· Describe how you’d deal with the opponent to your place. Be particular and present examples.
· Not less than 2 exterior sources and 2-Three course-specific sources are used.
Agenda Comparability Grid Task Template for Half 1 and Half 2
Half 1: Agenda Comparability Grid
Use this Agenda Comparability Grid to doc details about the inhabitants well being/healthcare subject you chose and the presidential agendas. By finishing this grid, you’ll develop a extra in-depth understanding of your chosen subject and the way you would possibly place it politically based mostly on the presidential agendas.
You’ll use the data in Half 1: Agenda Comparability Grid to finish the remaining Half 2 and Half Three of your Task.
Establish the Inhabitants Well being concern you chose.
Describe the Inhabitants Well being concern you chose.
Administration (President Identify)
Clarify how every of the 2 presidential administrations approached the difficulty.
Establish the allocations of sources that the present and earlier presidents devoted to this subject.
Describe the executive agenda focus associated to this subject for the present and two earlier presidents.
Half 2: Agenda Comparability Grid Assessment
Utilizing the data, you recorded in Half 1: Agenda Comparability Grid, full the next to doc details about the inhabitants well being/healthcare subject you chose
Administration Donald Trump Barrack Obama George W. Bush
Which administrative company (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would probably be answerable for serving to you deal with the healthcare subject you chose? Why is that this company probably the most useful?
How do you suppose your chosen healthcare subject would possibly get on the presidential agenda? How does it keep there?
Who would you select to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor (this could be a celeb, a legislator, an company director, or others) of the healthcare subject you chose? An instance is Michael J. Fox, a champion for Parkinson’s illness.
References
—–
Pattern Notes:
Legislation Grid
Legislation Grid
Identify of Well being-Associated Invoice
The Restoring Hope for Psychological Well being and Effectively-Being Act of 2022 (H.R.7666)
Invoice No. H.R.7666
Rep. Pallone, Frank, Jr. [D-NJ-6] launched the invoice on 5/6/2022. The invoice’s function is to suggest an modification to the Public Well being Service Act as a way to reauthorize sure psychological well being and substance abuse packages (GovTrack.us., 2022).
State or federal?
Federal
The invoice’s legislative intent is to amend the Public Well being Service Act to reauthorize sure psychological well being and substance abuse packages (GovTrack.us., 2022). The aim is to extend entry to psychological well being and substance abuse remedy packages.
Proponents/Detractors Proponents:
The invoice’s supporters consider that reauthorizing psychological well being and substance abuse packages will profit low-income households. The aim is to broaden the scope of healthcare providers for affected teams affected by psychological well being points and drug and substance habit. Opponents:
Opponents of the invoice argue that increasing healthcare providers by reauthorizing the psychological well being subject will price the federal government cash. Opponents consider the invoice may have little influence on psychological well being and drug habit. They consider the invoice fails to handle the actual points surrounding psychological well being and drug and substance abuse.
Individuals with psychological well being points and drug and substance habit are the goal inhabitants.
The Human and Well being Companies Division.
The Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC).
The invoice’s present standing (is it in committees or hearings?)
The invoice has been launched and scheduled for additional motion on the union calendar.
Normal Remarks/Feedback
Tens of millions of individuals in America undergo from psychological well being points and drug and substance habit. It’s vital to revive hope to tens of millions of individuals by amending the general public well being service. The act’s aim is to reauthorize sure psychological well being and substance abuse packages for the good thing about all People.
Half 2: Advocacy Statement/Legislative Testimony
The laws’s aim is to reauthorize particular psychological well being and substance abuse packages. The aim is to make sure that folks in numerous states have entry to psychological well being providers. The dynamics of the Covid-19 pandemic present a rise within the variety of folks prone to psychological well being points on account of job losses, excessive dwelling prices, and the chance of shedding property and financial savings (Knopf, 2022). It’s all too straightforward for folks to hunt solace by means of substance, alcohol, and drug abuse. The laws is well timed as a result of the nation requires improved supply of psychological healthcare providers in addition to substance and alcohol abuse remedy.
As a result of tens of millions of individuals are prone to anxiousness and despair, I consider the laws is well timed. Therapy reauthorization and community enlargement will remove the chance of preventable deaths. Reauthorization successfully grants entry to tens of millions of people who find themselves suicidal or depressed (Makwana, 2019). In accordance with analysis, healthcare providers are vital in saving lives, altering folks’s existence, and educating them (Knopf, 2022). The supply of healthcare providers for mentally challenged folks will improve the quantity of people that will be reached by the federal government and obtain free and skilled care.
The opposing arguments are based mostly on the allocation of funds. The aim is to first assess previous psychological well being and alcohol, drug, and substance abuse to determine weaknesses. The data will present a extra stable basis for making an knowledgeable determination. The opposing facet, in my view, is making an insensitive argument that ignores the well being of tens of millions of people who find themselves lacking out on healthcare providers meant for mentally sick folks and addicts of alcohol, medicine, and substances. To extend psychological healthcare providers and alcohol and substance abuse, particularly within the post-pandemic period, the laws requires help from a variety of stakeholders.
References
GovTrack.us. (2022). H.R. 7666 — Restoring Hope for Psychological Well being and Effectively-Being Act of 2022, 117th Congress Retrieved from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/payments/117/hr7666.
A. Knopf (2022). An enormous bipartisan invoice would overhaul SAMHSA packages. 1-Four in Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly, 34(19).
N. Makwana (2019). A story overview of catastrophe and its influence on psychological well being. 3090, Journal of Household Medication and Main Care, eight(10).
—-
Pattern notes 2:
Legislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement
Testimony/Advocacy Statement and Legislation Grid
Legislation Grid
Module 2 Assessment Legislation Grid Half 1 and Testimony/Advocacy Statement
H.R. Identify of Well being-Associated Invoice 1346 – 2019 Medicare Purchase-In and Well being Care Stabilization Act
Invoice No. H.R. 1346
Consultant Brian Haggins launched the invoice on February 25th, 2019. The invoice establishes certified people’ buy-in choices and modifications in healthcare prices (Congress, 2019). The invoice makes it attainable for adults aged 50 to 64 to use for Medicare. The invoice’s aim is to create a Medicare complement to ascertain cost-covering beneficiaries, repeal prohibitions, and develop market reinsurance packages to handle price points amongst people (Congress, 2019).
State or federal?
Federal
Legislative Intent The laws’s function is to amend Title XVIII of the Nationwide Social Safety Act. It permits folks aged 50 to 64 to use for Medicare. One other goal is to stabilize Medicare and the nationwide medical health insurance sector (Congress, 2019). Stabilization will necessitate filling present gaps in protection, akin to dental, listening to, and imaginative and prescient care. One other aim is to supply a buy-in choice for people who find themselves struggling financially (Congress, 2019). Permitting folks aged 50 to 64 to enroll expands healthcare protection.
Congress acknowledges that the present healthcare bundle incorporates various gaps within the healthcare provision. The legislative physique acknowledges that the inhabitants aged 50 to 64 faces monetary challenges in relation to paying for important well being providers akin to imaginative and prescient, listening to, and dental care (Congress, 2019). The introduction of latest laws is meant to fill gaps in Medicare coverage.
Proponents/ Opponents Proponents argue that people who find themselves enrolled within the plan are eligible for a premium discount. People can profit from cost-sharing preparations. Silver plans shall be eligible for elevated cost-sharing reductions (Tipirneni, 2020). It can make Medicare providers extra accessible. The plan permits states to enroll in Medicare as quickly as they turn into eligible.
The supporters show that folks aged 50 to 64 face monetary difficulties and thus are unable to pay for important providers akin to imaginative and prescient, listening to, and imaginative and prescient care (Tipirneni, 2020). Supporters argue that the coverage will finish the present exploitation of individuals looking for dental, imaginative and prescient, and listening to care. Information present that insurance coverage corporations exploit the aged by charging them exorbitant charges after they pay for vital providers out of their very own pockets (Tipirneni, 2020). The coverage’s implementation is a step towards eliminating the inequality that exists in at this time’s society. Inequality will be sure that folks in monetary problem have high quality entry to well being care. Failure to entry providers can result in a deterioration of the workforce, leading to excessive ranges of poverty and crime (Tipirneni, 2020). The federal government is answerable for enacting insurance policies that can forestall adverse outcomes that can hurt the nation’s monetary efficiency or social well-being.
Opponents argue that enrollees would nonetheless be topic to the excessive price of sharing in the event that they sought costly healthcare providers (Wilcock & Eibner, 2020). Proponents argue that the rising variety of enrollees makes healthcare buy-in and stabilization unsustainable.
Opponents of the invoice declare that it’s discriminatory or intends to create well being inequality as a result of it excludes folks over the age of 65 who require pressing oral, listening to, and imaginative and prescient care (Wilcock & Eibner, 2020). Individuals over the age of 65 are retired, which implies they’re extra more likely to face monetary difficulties and difficulties in paying for healthcare providers that aren’t coated by the final healthcare bundle (Wilcock & Eibner, 2020). Opponents argue that the invoice ought to embrace further provisions, akin to extending protection past 64 years.
The goal inhabitants consists of susceptible populations in addition to folks aged 50 to 64.
The invoice’s present standing (is it in committees or hearings?)
The invoice is presently being heard in subcommittee. The invoice was launched on February 25th, 2019, nevertheless it has obtained little help (Congress, 2019).
Normal Remarks/Feedback
The invoice is vital in stabilizing the medical health insurance sector as a way to keep away from gaps and points that might jeopardize the supply of high quality care. One other benefit is that the invoice goals to increase medical health insurance protection. It can take care of the financially challenged members of society (Wilcock & Eibner, 2020). The inclusion will Help to cut back healthcare inequalities.
Half 2: Advocacy Statement/Legislative Testimony
I’m in favor of H.R. As a healthcare supplier, you need to signal the 1346 – Medicare Purchase-In and Well being Care Stabilization Act of 2019. The coverage’s aim is to shut the gaps that exist within the healthcare sector (Tipirneni et al., 2020). I consider that folks aged 50 to 64 will welcome the invoice as a result of it’ll present them with entry to high-quality, low-cost care. I help the invoice as a result of it’ll permit family and the aged in society to obtain high quality care. Individuals between the ages of 50 and 64 are barred from enrolling within the healthcare providers assured by the Purchase-In and Well being Care Stabilization Act of 2019. Another excuse I help the present invoice is that it fills gaps in care, akin to dental, listening to, and imaginative and prescient care (Tipirneni et al., 2020). Because of this, sufferers pay extra for remedy for varied healthcare points akin to listening to, imaginative and prescient, and dental.
Statistics present that closing gaps within the healthcare sector will help to shut disparities. In accordance with a 2017 well being report, 75 p.c of sufferers with listening to issues and 43 p.c of these with imaginative and prescient issues didn’t obtain high quality care (Willink et al., 2020). The Purchase-In and Well being Care Stabilization Act of 2019 will present high-quality aid to sufferers affected by pricey medical points. Growing entry to care will Help to keep away from adverse results on office productiveness. I help the laws as a result of it’ll enhance societal well being. It can serve the aged inhabitants with listening to and imaginative and prescient issues (Willink et al., 2020). Eliminating the issues will result in equality in healthcare provision, versus the present panorama, which favors some over others.
Proponents of the laws argue that the Purchase-In and Well being Care Stabilization Act of 2019 is inadequate to supply varied healthcare options. One technique for overcoming opposition is to teach the general public about the advantages of the Purchase-In and Well being Care Stabilization Act of 2019. (Willink et al., 2020). The bulk of people that oppose or will oppose new laws accomplish that as a result of they lack the required expertise to grasp the advantages. The academic packages ought to permit folks to ask questions and make feedback concerning the coverage (Willink et al., 2020). The strategy will be sure that the workforce educating them understands all of their points. Individuals’s attitudes will shift on account of the training.
Legislators and supporters of the laws ought to use real-world information and eventualities to show the coverage’s advantages to opponents. Actual-life examples ought to embrace poor-neighborhood residents and the aged (Tipirneni, 2020). The situation ought to show how the present healthcare coverage has affected and marginalized them. Statistics ought to present how many individuals miss out on care every year on account of gaps within the healthcare system (Tipirneni, 2020). The info ought to present the difficulties in paying for oral, listening to, and imaginative and prescient providers amongst folks aged 50 to 64.
References
Congress. (2019). H.R. 1346 – 2019 Medicare Purchase-In and Well being Care Stabilization Act (2019). Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/invoice/116th-congress/house-bill/1346/textual content format=txt
R. Tipirneni, E. Solway, P. Malani, J. Luster, J. T. Kullgren, M. Kirch,… & A. M. Scherer (2020). Considerations about medical health insurance affordability and avoidance of well being care amongst US adults nearing retirement. e1920647-e1920647, JAMA Community Open, Three(2).
R. Tipirneni, E. Solway, P. Malani, J. Luster, J. T. Kullgren, M. Kirch,… & A. M. Scherer (2020). Considerations about medical health insurance affordability and avoidance of well being care amongst US adults nearing retirement. 1920647-e1920647, JAMA Community Open, Three(2).
A. Wilcock and C. Eibner (2020). Medicare for 50-to-64-12 months-Olds: Evaluating the Results of Permitting Older Adults to Buy Medicare The American Society of Well being Economists’ ninth Annual Convention. AsheCon.
A. Willink, N. S. Reed, B. Swenor, L. Leinbach, E. H. DuGoff, and Okay. Davis. (2020). Entry, Spending, And Protection For Medicare Beneficiaries: The function of Medicare Benefit plans in offering dental, imaginative and prescient, and listening to providers to older adults, notably low- and middle-income beneficiaries. 297-304 in Well being Affairs, 39(2).
