Week 5: Task: Venture Planning and Preparation
Objective
Venture planning might be an necessary side of your new position as a DNP-prepared nurse. The aim of this project is to additional discover the mission planning course of as you put together in your DNP mission. This project is an extension of the Week 2 and Week three assignments and any earlier work you may have achieved in your chosen follow downside or in your DNP mission planning.
Course Outcomes
This project permits the scholar to fulfill the next course outcomes:
· CO 2: Formulate a needs-based organizational Assessment to tell strategic management decision-making. (POs three, 5, 7)
· CO three: Develop methods to guide mission planning, implementation, administration, and analysis to advertise high-value healthcare. (POs three, 5, 7)
Web page Requirement:
Size Four-5 pages – excluding title web page and references.
Directions
Overview the Graduate Re-Objective Coverage within the Scholar Handbook, web page 15
Repurposed Work (Chamberlain College Graduate Packages solely): Graduate college students have the chance to make use of beforehand submitted concepts as a basis for future programs. Not more than 50 % of an project, excluding references, could also be repurposed from one other Chamberlain College course (excluding practicum programs). Earlier course assignments which might be deemed constructing blocks might be notated within the syllabus by the course chief. As with each project, college students should uphold tutorial integrity; subsequently, college students should observe the rules for remaining academically trustworthy in line with the Tutorial Integrity coverage. If the teacher is just not made conscious of the repurposing of an project, the submission might be handled as plagiarized work if not correctly referenced
Use the next subheadings as Stage 1 headers to arrange your paper.
1. Introduction
a. Begin your introduction with a robust assertion or two to stimulate curiosity.
b. Current the aim of your proposed mission. Start your formal goal assertion by stating, “The aim of the proposed (DNP) mission is to…”
c. Present a preview of what the paper will embody with a powerful thesis sentence.
2. Assessment
a. Describe the follow downside on the nationwide stage; Help with knowledge.
b. Describe the follow downside on the practicum website; Help with knowledge if accessible.
c. Establish and describe the sources of knowledge from the practicum website. For instance, Incident stories, readmission charges, an infection charges, and so on.
three. Planning—Proof Synthesis
a. Current the up to date proof synthesis to establish the evidence-based follow (EBP) intervention to deal with the follow downside and want for change. (Use the synthesis from the week 2 project – you’ll want to settle for monitor modifications and replace your Week 2 paper primarily based on suggestions offered by course college earlier than including to this paper).
i. Details/salient themes that emerge from the sources (Cited)
ii. Examine and distinction details/ themes from all sources (Cited)
iii. Goal rationale for the intervention primarily based on the literature
Four. Implementation
a. Clearly describe the DNP mission evidence-based intervention.
b. Talk about the rationale for why this intervention was chosen.
c. Establish the survey/ instrument/ software, if utilizing one, and why it was chosen.
i. If not utilizing a survey/ instrument/ software, how will you be accumulating knowledge? For instance, chart audits.
d. Describe your implementation plan to incorporate milestones.
5. Analysis
a. Suggest measurable outcomes for the mission.
b. Describe how the outcomes might be evaluated.
6. Conclusion
a. Successfully summarize your mission plans in a single to 2 complete but concise paragraphs that clearly describe your mission plans to incorporate:
i. Clarify how you’ll implement the mission.
ii. Clarify how you’ll consider the mission.
7. APA Format
a. Makes use of acceptable Stage I headers.
b. References and citations are in present APA format.
c. Paper size is Four-5 pages excluding the title and reference pages.
eight. Readability of Writing
a. Use of normal English grammar and sentence construction.
b. No spelling errors or typographical errors.
c. Organized across the required elements utilizing acceptable headers.
Rubric
Week 5 Task Grading Rubric: Venture Planning and Preparation (240 pts)
Week 5 Task Grading Rubric: Venture Planning and Preparation (240 pts)
Standards
Scores
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeIntroduction
Necessities: 1. Begin your introduction with a robust assertion or two to stimulate curiosity. 2. Current the aim of your proposed mission. Start your formal goal assertion by stating, “The aim of the proposed (DNP) mission is to…” three. Present a preview of what the paper will embody with a powerful thesis sentence.
30 pts
Wonderful or Highest Stage of Efficiency
Contains all necessities and gives an in-depth introduction.
27 pts
Good or Excessive Stage of Efficiency
Contains all necessities and gives a ample introduction.
24 pts
Acceptable or fundamental Stage of Efficiency
Contains 2 necessities and/or gives a partial introduction.
zero pts
Failing Stage of Efficiency
Offers an undeveloped introduction.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeAssessment of the Follow Downside
Necessities: 1. Describe the follow downside on the nationwide stage. 2. Present knowledge to Help the follow downside on the nationwide stage. three. Describe the follow downside on the native stage and Help with knowledge, if accessible. If not accessible, state that explicitly. Four. Establish and describe sources of knowledge from the practicum website.
40 pts
Wonderful or Highest Stage of Efficiency
Contains all knowledge necessities and gives an in-depth dialogue within the Assessment of the follow downside.
36 pts
Good or Excessive Stage of Efficiency
Contains at the very least three necessities and/or gives a ample dialogue within the Assessment of the follow downside.
32 pts
Acceptable or fundamental Stage of Efficiency
Contains at the very least 2 necessities and/or gives a partial dialogue within the Assessment of the follow downside.
zero pts
Failing Stage of Efficiency
Offers an undeveloped dialogue within the Assessment of the follow downside.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomePlanning -Proof Synthesis
Necessities: 1. Use the synthesis from the Week 2 project—you’ll want to settle for monitor modifications and replace your Week 2 paper primarily based on suggestions offered by course college. 2. Current the primary themes, and salient findings that emerge from the sources (Cited). three. Distinction the details from all sources (Cited). Four. Current an goal rationale for the intervention primarily based on the literature.
40 pts
Wonderful or Highest Stage of Efficiency
Contains all necessities and gives an in-depth Proof Synthesis supporting the evidence-based intervention. The requested revisions from the earlier Proof Synthesis project had been accomplished.
36 pts
Good or Excessive Stage of Efficiency
Contains at the very least three necessities and/or gives a ample Proof Synthesis supporting the evidence-based intervention.
32 pts
Acceptable or fundamental Stage of Efficiency
Contains at the very least 2 necessities and/or gives a partial Proof Synthesis supporting the evidence-based intervention.
zero pts
Failing Stage of Efficiency
Offers an undeveloped Proof Synthesis supporting the evidence-based Intervention.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeImplementation
Necessities: 1. Describe the DNP mission evidence-based intervention. 2. Talk about the rationale for why this intervention was chosen is offered. three. Establish and describe the survey/ instrument/ software, if utilizing one, and why it was chosen. If not utilizing a survey/ instrument/ software, how will you be accumulating knowledge? Four. Describe your implementation plan and embody mission milestones.
40 pts
Wonderful or Highest Stage of Efficiency
Contains all necessities and gives an in-depth implementation plan with milestones.
36 pts
Good or Excessive Stage of Efficiency
Contains at the very least three necessities and/or gives a ample implementation plan.
32 pts
Acceptable or fundamental Stage of Efficiency
Contains at the very least 2 necessities and/or gives a partial implementation plan.
zero pts
Failing Stage of Efficiency
Offers an undeveloped implementation plan.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeAssessment
Necessities: 1. Suggest measurable outcomes for the mission. 2. Describe how the outcomes might be evaluated.
40 pts
Wonderful or Highest Stage of Efficiency
Contains all necessities and gives an in-depth Analysis.
36 pts
Good or Excessive Stage of Efficiency
Contains all necessities and/or gives a ample Analysis.
32 pts
Acceptable or fundamental Stage of Efficiency
Contains at the very least 1 requirement and/or gives a partial Analysis.
zero pts
Failing Stage of Efficiency
Offers an undeveloped Analysis.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeConclusion
Necessities: 1. In a single to 2 concise paragraphs, present a transparent and logical conclusion. 2. Summarize how you’ll implement the mission. three. Summarize how you’ll consider the mission
30 pts
Wonderful or Highest Stage of Efficiency
Contains all necessities and gives an in-depth abstract within the conclusion.
27 pts
Good or Excessive Stage of Efficiency
Contains at the very least 2 necessities and/or gives a ample abstract within the conclusion.
24 pts
Acceptable or fundamental Stage of Efficiency
Contains at the very least 1 requirement and/or gives a partial abstract within the conclusion.
zero pts
Failing Stage of Efficiency
Offers an undeveloped abstract within the conclusion.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeAPA Fashion and Requirements
Necessities: 1. Makes use of acceptable Stage I headers. 2. Reference and citations are in present APA fashion. three. Paper size is Four-5 pages excluding title and reference pages
10 pts
Wonderful or Highest Stage of Efficiency
Contains all necessities of APA fashion and requirements.
9 pts
Good or Excessive Stage of Efficiency
Contains 2 necessities of APA fashion and requirements.
eight pts
Acceptable or fundamental Stage of Efficiency
Contains 1 necessities of APA fashion and requirements
zero pts
Failing Stage of Efficiency
Contains fewer than all necessities and/or demonstrates poor APA fashion and requirements.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeClarity of Writing
Necessities: 1. Makes use of commonplace English grammar and sentence construction. 2. No spelling or typographical errors. three. Organized presentation of concepts.
10 pts
Wonderful or Highest Stage of Efficiency
Contains all necessities of readability of writing.
9 pts
Good or Excessive Stage of Efficiency
Contains 2 necessities of readability of writing.
eight pts
Acceptable or fundamental Stage of Efficiency
Contains 1 requirement of readability of writing.
zero pts
Failing Stage of Efficiency
Contains fewer than all necessities and/or demonstrates poor readability of writing.
10 pts
Whole Factors: 240
