PHI 110 Nassau Dealing with Ethical Dilemmas in Medical Practice Case Study
PHI 110 Nassau Dealing with Ethical Dilemmas in Medical Practice Case Study
(1) Reply in your personal phrases.
DO NOT use every other sources (e.g., web, articles, books, different scholar’s essays, and many others.).
2) Use quotes from the assigned readings to Help your claims.
Use a minimum of TWO (2) quotes per Question Assignment.
You should definitely CITE these quotations.
Your quotation might be so simple as: “quote” (Creator/Title, p.#).
(three) needs to be a minimum of three pages whole.
One web page is roughly 250-300 phrases.
DO NOT rewrite the Question Assignment in your reply.
Solutions to “opinion” questions needs to be a minimum of Four-5 sentences.
For “opinion” questions, state your place after which state your causes (i.e., proof) for that place.
(Four) Every Question Assignment has a number of components.
You should definitely absolutely reply every a part of the Question Assignment.
You should definitely clearly establish which Question Assignment and half you’re answering.
For instance: 1(a) [Your answer here], 1(b) [Your answer here], and many others.
(5) Proofread & Revise
You may be graded on BOTH content material & writing (grammar, punctuation, & spelling).
(6) For full credit score, you will need to additionally observe these formatting pointers:
Use 12-point font.
Double area.
Indent each new paragraph
use PDF
___________________________________
(1) ESSAY: (beneath) consists of THREE (three) questions. Reply ALL THREE (three) questions and ALL PARTS of every Question Assignment.
2) Write your solutions in separate doc (all questions in one doc)._____________________________________________________________________________________
Question Assignment #1: The Ideas of Bioethics, Utilitarianism & Kantian Deontology (15 factors)Wanda is recognized with a really contagious and lethal illness. Her physician, Dr. Imaginative and prescient, strongly urges Wanda to instantly inform all of her current contacts (relations, co-workers, and many others.) about her prognosis in order to maintain them, and others, from severe hurt. Wanda, nevertheless, refuses to tell anybody and reminds Dr. Imaginative and prescient that he promised to maintain all of her data confidential earlier than she agreed to get examined. The physician needs to guard others from hurt however he additionally needs to maintain his phrase. At this level, he’s unsure about tips on how to proceed.
(a) Utilizing Beauchamp & Childress’s Ideas of Bioethics, what’s Dr. Visions’s moral dilemma?In your reply, be sure you establish the 2 rules which are in battle for Dr. Imaginative and prescient and clarify how they battle.
(b) In line with Act Utilitarianism, what ought to Dr. Imaginative and prescient do?Word that your reply MUST embrace an utility of the Precept of Utility that considers:
the results for each actions Dr. Imaginative and prescient may carry out
each good and dangerous penalties of every motion
everybody affected by the motion (e.g., affected person, the Physician, and many others.)
how the decision produces the best stability of excellent over dangerous
gives a transparent decision (i.e., what Dr. Imaginative and prescient ought to do)
(c) In line with Kantian Deontology, what ought to Dr. Imaginative and prescient do?Word that your reply MUST embrace an utility of the Categorical Crucial that EITHER:
Applies the Precept of Universalizability (ensure to observe and clarify all three steps).
Gives a transparent decision (i.e., what Dr. Imaginative and prescient ought to do) based mostly on the Precept of Universalizability.
-OR-
Applies the Precept of Humanity.
Gives a transparent decision (what Dr. Imaginative and prescient ought to do) based mostly on the Precept of Humanity.
(d) Which principle, Utilitarianism or Kantian Deontology, do you suppose gives the very best decision and why?
Question Assignment #2: Ross’s Prima Facie Duties (5 factors)Matthew is a terminally ailing affected person who now not has the capability to make choices. As such, his household is making choices for him and they’re insisting that the physician, Dr. Quinn, “does every part” to maintain Matthew alive. Dr. Quinn, nevertheless, would really like the household to concern a DNR (don’t resuscitate) order as a result of she feels resuscitation would trigger rather more hurt to the affected person than good. It is rather unlikely that Matthew would survive resuscitation and even when he does, he’ll very doubtless not regain consciousness. Within the extraordinarily unlikely case that he does regain consciousness, he shall be in extreme ache from the affect of the process on his physique, which is already very weak from his terminal sickness. After explaining this to the household, they nonetheless refuse to concern the DNR. Dr. Quinn isn’t certain what she ought to do since she doesn’t need her affected person to undergo unnecessarily.
(a) Utilizing Ross’s Prima Facie Duties, what’s Dr. Quinns’s moral dilemma? In different phrases, which two prima facie duties battle in this case?Word that your reply should embrace a proof of the place these two duties come from.
(b) In line with Ross’s principle, which prima facie responsibility takes precedence and why?
(c) In line with Ross’s principle, what can we do if somebody disagrees with your reply from (b)?
Question Assignment three: Elementary Ideas (5 factors)Miranda is recognized with a extreme bacterial an infection. Left untreated, the an infection will shortly grow to be lethal. Fortunately, a dose of antibiotics will simply remedy the affected person and save her life. Nevertheless, it have to be given to her intravenously (by way of an IV). After rigorously explaining all of the dangers and advantages of the antibiotic, Miranda says she doesn’t wish to take the remedy. When Dr. Dorian inquires as to why she is refusing care, Miranda says: “I wish to dwell and I do know this remedy can save my life, however there isn’t any manner you’re placing that needle in me. Simply the considered an IV makes my pores and skin crawl! Simply maintain it away from me–it’s freaking me out!”
(a) Establish whether or not or not Miranda is autonomous and clarify why. If she will not be autonomous, be sure you establish and clarify which situation(s) of autonomy is lacking.
(b) Which liberty limiting precept may justify overriding the affected person’s refusal of care?You should definitely clarify which precept is perhaps used and what sort of justification it could require.
(c) When you have been Dr. Dorian, what would you do and why?
