PUBH6007_Assessment_2 Part A_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 1 of 11
ASSESSMENT 2A BRIEF
Subject Code and Title PUBH6007 Program Design, Implementation and Assessment
Assessment 2:
Part A: Presentation: Project Plan: Objectives, Strategies and Logic
Model
Individual/Group Group
Length Part A: 10-minute presentation, 3-minute questions
Learning Outcomes a) Interpret the importance of performing needs analysis in
public health program development. Apply different
methodologies of needs assessment to establish and
prioritise community needs.
b) Develop a Program Logic Model and critically analyse the
link between the components of Program Logic Model and
Program Theory in Public Health program design
c) Develop an evidence-based Program and Assessment Plan
for the implementation and Assessment of a Public Health
Program.
d) Critically examine and apply the principles and strategies of
community and stakeholder engagement.
e) Critically examine and apply the principles of Assessment,
comparing the types and stages of Assessment utilised in
Public Health Program development.
Submission Part A: Online: Presentation recordings and powerpoint slides due
Sunday of Module 8 at 11.55pm AEST.
On-campus: Presentations and Powerpoint slides due Module 8 in
class.
Weighting Part A: 20%
Total Marks 100 marks
*Please Note: This time is AEST or AEDT (Melbourne, Sydney, Canberra). Please convert to your own
time zone (e.g. Adelaide = 11:25pm).
Assessment Task
The culmination of individual needs assessments will mean that your group now has a
comprehensive and complex understanding of your target population. It’s now time to start
planning! In Assessment 2 your group will be required to present a blueprint of your program plan to
your fellow students. In this presentation (10 min) your group needs to outline your programs
objectives and strategies, and present your logic model. You will also be expected to answer
questions (3 min) from your peers and your learning facilitator.
PUBH6007_Assessment_2 Part A_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 2 of 11
Assessment Flow Chart
Please ensure that you read the Portfolio Assessment Brief before completing this assessment.
Context
The ability to communicate and present ideas clearly is essential for your success as a public health
professional. Public health professionals rarely work in isolation, and as such collaboration skills are
essential to your career in Public health. In this assessment you will have the opportunity to learn
skills required to present and interact efficiently with stakeholders, as well as amongst your group
members. The successful completion of this assessment requires strong collaboration and
engagement from all group members.
Task Instructions:
In this task you are required to create and present a 10 minute group presentation that
provides a blueprint of your program plan. This presentation needs to include the
following.
1. Include an overview of your group’s presentation:
• A brief introduction of your group and topic.
• A brief overview of your public health issue based on need assessment.
2. Program and Assessment Plan blueprint:
• Program Logic model
o Based on prioritised need for a chosen population.
• Overarching Goal
o The overall aim that you want to achieve via your program following SMART
criteria.
• Objectives
o There should be at least 3 objectives following SMART criteria.
• Strategies
o How you will go about achieving your goal and objectives;
o The activities that will contribute to the achievement of the objectives.
o A clear relationship between activities and outcomes Which activities are
being implemented through engagement of stakeholders to produce
progress on which outcomes?
1. Needs assessment
(Individual)
2. Part A: Objectives,
Strategies & Logic
Model (Group)
2. Part B: Program
Planning,
Implementation &
Assessment Plan (Group)
3. Reflection: Program
Planning Process and
Colaboration
(Individual)
PUBH6007_Assessment_2 Part A_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 3 of 11
3. Risks and Challenges
• Identify any potential challenges to the program
• What may occur that can put the program at risk, what are the
challenges, and how will you address them?
o For example, people may not enrol?
4. Brief Conclusion and summary
5. Slide with references
6. Questions
• Each group will spend 3 minutes answering questions from the Learning Facilitator
and from fellow students. Groups will be marked on both the quality of the answers
they provide and the quality of the questions they ask other groups.
Referencing
It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more
information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.
Submission Instructions
Online
Recording Instructions
• You can record your group presentation using the web conferencing app of your preference,
for example, Zoom, Skype, Microsoft Teams, etc.
o Please note that ad-hoc university tech support for web conferencing apps is not
available.
• Please refer to the following useful information to guide you in compressing and uploading
your video presentation:
o Steps required to record your video presentation.
You will be teamed up with another group by your Learning Facilitator. You will need to organise a
time that suits all members, and meet via Blackboard Collaborate Ultra, or via Zoom, to present your
presentations to each other. Each group must ask and answer 3 minutes of questions.
This session is to be recorded and the recording link and slides need to be uploaded to the
Assessment 2 link in the main navigation menu in PUBH6007 Program Design, Implementation and
Assessment.
On-Campus:
PUBH6007_Assessment_2 Part A_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 4 of 11
Groups will be allocated a time to present during the Module 8 class each group must ask and
answer 3 minutes of questions. Presentation slides will need to be uploaded to Assessment 2 link in
the main navigation menu in PUBH6007 Program Design, Implementation and Assessment the
completion of the Module 8 class.
The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the Blackboard portal.
Feedback can be viewed in My Grade
Academic Integrity
All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately
referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need
PUBH6007_Assessment_2 PartA_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 5 of 11
Assessment Rubric
Assessment
Attributes
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum standard)
0-49%
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84%
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Overview of the topic
and demonstrated
understanding of the
issue
Principles of program
planning, key
components of
program planning
including; program
logic model,
prioritisation of
needs, goal,
Overview of the topic
does not demonstrate
an understanding of the
public health
issue/problem being
expored.
Overview of the topic
demonstrates a limited
understanding of the
public health
issue/problem being
expored.
Overview of the topic
demonstrates a good
understanding of the
public health
issue/problem being
expored.
Overview of the topic
demonstrates a very
good understanding of
the public health
issue/problem being
expored.
Overview of the topic
demonstrates a
sophisticated
understanding of the
public health
issue/problem being
expored.
PUBH6007_Assessment_2 PartA_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 6 of 11
objective, strategies
and challenges.
Percentage for this
criterion =30%
Presentation and
discussion of the key
components of
program planning
including logic model,
prioritisation of needs,
goal, objectives, and
strategies is limited or
lacking.
Potential challenges are
not idenfitied
Presentation and
discussion of the key
components of program
planning including logic
model, prioritisation of
needs, goal, objectives,
and strategies,
demonstrates a limited
understanding of the
program planning process.
Potential challenges
idenfitied demonstrate
limited understanding of
the barriers that can occur
within program design and
planning.
Presentation and
discussion of the key
components of program
planning including logic
model, prioritisation of
needs, goal, objectives,
and strategies,
demonstrates an
appropriate
understanding of the
program planning
process.
Potential challenges
idenfitied demonstrate a
good understanding of
the barriers that can
occur within program
design and planning.
Presentation and
discussion of the key
components of program
planning including logic
model, prioritisation of
needs, goal, objectives,
and strategies,
demonstrates an
impressive
understanding of the
program planning
process.
Potential challenges
idenfitied demonstrate a
well rounded
understanding of the
barriers that can occur
within program design
and planning.
Presentation and
discussion of the key
components of program
planning including logic
model, prioritisation of
needs, goal, objectives,
and strategies,
demonstrates an indepth
understanding of the
program planning
process.
Potential challenges
idenfitied demonstrate a
comprehensive
understanding of the
barriers that can occur
within program design
and planning.
PUBH6007_Assessment_2 PartA_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 7 of 11
Application and
analysis
Critical analysis of
the public health
problem, analysis of
needs and
challenges.
Application of key
planning
components; logic
model, goal,
objectives, strategies
including use of
SMART crtieria.
Percentage for this
criterion = 40%
Critical analysis of the
public health issue is
lacking. Evidence is
required to support the
discussion of needs
analysis and potential
challenges.
Key components of the
program planning
process including logic
model, prioritisation of
needs, goal, objectives
and strategies including
stakeholder
engagement applied
incorrectly, and key
aspects are missing
Relationships between
activities and outcomes
are not identified.
SMART criteria is not
utilised and
demonstrated correctly
Critical analysis of the
public health issue is
limited. More detailed
evidence is required to
support the discussion of
needs analysis and
potential challenges.
Key components of the
program planning process
including logic model,
prioritisation of needs,
goal, objectives and
strategies including
stakeholder engagement
are not applied correctly,
or key aspects are missing
Relationships between
activities and outcomes
are not clearly identified.
SMART criteria is utilised,
but aspects are not
demonstrated fully
Critical analysis of the
public health issue
demonstrated, including
an evidence based
discussion of the needs
analysis and potential
challenges.
Key components of the
program planning
process including logic
model, prioritisation of
needs, goal, objectives
and strategies including
stakeholder engagement
are utilised and applied
correctly, with no aspects
missing.
Relationships between
activities and outcomes
are clearly identified.
SMART criteria is utilised
and demonstrated
correctly
Detailed critical analysis
of the public health issue
demonstrated, including
a well developed
evidence based
discussion of the needs
analysis and potential
challenges.
Key components of the
program planning
process logic model,
prioritisation of needs,
goal, objective and
strategies including
stakeholder engagement
are utilised and applied
well, with no aspects
missing.
Relationships between
activities and outcomes
are clearly identified.
SMART criteria is utilised
and demonstrated clearly
and correctly
Exceptional critical
analysis of the public
health issue
demonstrated, including
an insightful and
sophisticated and
evidence based
discussion of the needs
analysis and potential
challenges.
Key components of the
program planning
process logic model,
prioritisation of needs,
goal, objective and
strategies including
stakeholder engagement
are applied correctly and
professionally.
Relationships between
activities and outcomes
are identified and
described clearly and
succinctly
SMART criteria is utilised
and demonstrated
clearly, correctly and
realistically
PUBH6007_Assessment_2 PartA_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 8 of 11
Quality of questions
and answers
Percentage for this
criterion = 10%
Group did not provide
appropriate answers
Group did not ask
questions
Group provided answers,
though detail is lacking .
Group questions
demonstrate a limited
level of engagement and
inquiry
Group provided accurate
answers.
Group questions
demonstrate a good level
of engagement and
inquiry
Group provided accurate
and well articulated
answers.
Group questions
demonstrate an high
levels of engagement,
inquiry and analysis.
Group provided accurate
and well articulated
answers that
demonstrated a
sophistication of
thinking.
Group questions
demonstrate a
impressive levels of
engagement, inquiry and
analysis.
PUBH6007_Assessment_2 PartA_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 9 of 11
Group contribution,
collaboration and
dynamic.
Group member
engagement and
contribution. Group
organisation and
dynamic
Percentage for this
criterion = 10%
Minimal group
members were active in
the presentation.
Minimal group
members engaged in
asking and answering
questions.
Presentation lacks
group cohesion and
organisation.
Some group members
were active in the
presentation.
Some group members
engaged in asking and
answering questions.
Presentation
demonstrates limited
group cohesion and
organisation.
Most group members
were active in the
presentation.
Most group members
engaged in asking and
answering questions.
.
Presentation
demonstrates a good
level of group cohesion
and organisation
All group members were
highly active in the
presentation.
All group members
engaged in asking and
answering questions.
Presentation
demonstrates a very
goodlevel of group
cohesion and
organisation.
All group members were
highly active and
dynamic in their
involvement in the
presentation.
All group members
engaged in asking highly
relevant questions and
providing clear and well
articulated answers.
Presentation
demonstrates a high
level of group cohesion
and organisation.
PUBH6007_Assessment_2 PartA_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 10 of 11
Quality of
Presentation
Percentage for this
criterion = 10%
Presentation is
insufficient in terms of
content and
presentation time
Presentation does not
flow and there are
grammatical errors.
Limited research
evident
There are numerous
mistakes in using the
APA Style
Presentation is lacking in
terms of content
Presentation flows though
there are grammatical
errors.
More extensive research is
required
There are limited mistakes
in using the APA Style
Presentation is well
articulated in terms of
content and presentation
time
Presentation flows well
and has no grammatical
errors.
Relevant research
sources used to support
and develop arguments
and position statements.
Though more evidence is
required. Shows
evidence of limited
reading beyond
the key reading.
There are no mistakes in
using the APA Style
Presentation is very well
articulated in terms of
content and presentation
time
Presentation flows
logically, and has no
grammatical errors.
Quality, credible and
relevant research sources
used to support and
develop arguments and
position statements.
Shows evidence of
reading beyond the key
reading.
There are no mistakes in
using the APA Style.
Presentation is expertly
articulated in terms of
content and
presentation time
Presentation flows
logically and
professionally, and has
no grammatical errors.
High‐quality, credible
and relevant research
sources used to support
and develop arguments
and position statements.
Shows extensive
evidence of reading
beyond the key reading.
There are no mistakes in
using the APA Style.
PUBH6007_Assessment_2 PartA_Brief_ _Module Due 8 Page 11 of 11
The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment
SLO a) Interpret the importance of performing needs analysis in public health program development. Apply different methodologies of needs
assessment to establish and prioritise community needs.
SLO b) Develop a Program Logic Model and critically analyse the link between the components of Program Logic Model and Program Theory in
Public Health program design
SLO c) Develop an evidence-based Program and Assessment Plan for the implementation and Assessment of a Public Health Program.
SLO d) Critically examine and apply the principles and strategies of community and stakeholder engagement.
SLO e) Critically examine and apply the principles of Assessment, comparing the types and stages of Assessment utilised in Public Health Program
development.

Published by

Essays

View all posts