Order custom papers, masters thesis and dissertation in 3 guided steps; human written!
Posted: April 13th, 2023
DISCUSSION GRADING RUBRIC
Criteria Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%) Advanced
92–100% Proficient
84-91% Developing
1–83% Not present
Thread:
Content
6.5 to 7 points:
All key components of the Discussion prompt are answered in the thread.
• The thread is well-developed and fully addresses all aspects of the question.
• The thread is factually correct, is reflective, and is a substantive contribution.
• The thread advances discussion.
• The thread contributes to discussion with clear, concise comments. 5.75 to 6.25 points:
Most of the key components of the Discussion prompt are answered in a thread.
• Major points are stated clearly for the most part.
• Additional academic reference support and/or examples is needed
• Thoughtful analysis is clearly demonstrated for the most part. 1 to 5.5 points:
The key components of the Discussion prompt are not adequately answered.
• Not all the major points are clearly stated and supported.
• Lacks academic support and/or examples.
• Thoughtful analysis is not clearly demonstrated. 0 points
Not present
Thread:
Research Engagement 6.5 to 7 points:
• A minimum of two peer-reviewed/scholarly sources are referenced and integrated.
• Peer-reviewed articles are recent and relevant. 5.75 to 6.25 points:
• A minimum of two peer-reviewed/scholarly sources are integrated somewhat.
• Academic quality is lacking. 1 to 5.5 points:
References are not peer-reviewed/scholarly sources and/or appropriately integrated. 0 points
Not present
Replies:
Content 6.5 to 7 points:
At least 2 substantive replies given in response to classmates’ threads that:
• Relate to the concepts learned through the required readings and
• Share relevant additional knowledge. 5.75 to 6.25 points:
At least 2 substantive replies given in response to classmates’ threads. More attention should be given to:
• The concepts learned through the required readings and
• Shared relevant additional knowledge. 1 to 5.5 points:
• Missing one reply.
• Reply posts are redundant.
• New ideas, research, and/or analysis are not adequately included.
0 points
Not present
Replies:
Research Engagement 6.5 to 7 points:
A minimum of 2 academic /scholarly source is referenced and integrated. 5.75 to 6.25 points:
A minimum of 1 academic /scholarly source is referenced and integrated somewhat. Academic quality is lacking. 1 to 5.5 points:
References are not academic/scholarly sources and/or appropriately integrated. 0 points
Not present
Thread & Replies
Biblical Worldview 6.5 to 7 points:
The post brings clarity to issues being discussed, relating issues to scriptural/biblical principles and experience. 5.75 to 6.25 points:
The post brings some clarity to issues being discussed, relating issues to scriptural/biblical principles and experience. 1 to 5.5 points:
• Attention is needed to clarify issues being discussed, relating issues to scriptural/biblical principles and experience.
• Not present on one to two responses. 0 points
Not present
Structure (30%) Advanced
92–100% Proficient
84-91% Developing
1–83% Not present
APA, Grammar, Spelling, & Structure 9.25 to 10 points:
• Academic/scholarly sources are referenced and cited appropriately. The thread correctly references literature, readings, or personal experience to support comments.
• This section must be balanced in the “spirit of APA” as Bb DB’s create internal formatting errors.
• Minimal to zero errors in spelling, grammar, and structure. 8.75 to 9 points:
• Some errors in APA.
• Some errors in spelling, grammar, and structure. 1 to 8.5 points:
• Numerous errors in APA.
• Numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and structure.
0 points
Not present
Word Count 4.75 to 5 points:
• Required word count (500-700 words) is met for the initial response.
• At least 2 substantive replies of 200-300 words for each reply. 4.25 to 4.5 points:
• Required word count (250–300 words) is not met for the initial response, but student has posted at least 200 words and/or;
• Only 1 substantive reply of 100–150 words for each reply. 1 to 4 points:
Initial post less than 200 words and/or replies lack depth and contain only a few sentences. 0 points
Not present
You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver
We’ve put together our writing team with care, choosing talented writers who shine in their fields. Each one goes through a tough selection process, where we look for folks with deep expertise in specific subjects and a solid history of academic writing. They bring their own mix of know-how and flair to the table, making sure our content hits the mark—packed with info, easy to read, and perfect for college students like you.
We don’t do AI-written essays or copycat work—everything’s original. Competitive pricing is a big deal for us; we keep costs fair while delivering top-notch quality. Our writers are some of the best out there, and we charge rates that stack up well against other services. This means you get stellar content without draining your wallet. Our pricing is straightforward and honest, built to give you real value for your money. That’s why students turn to us for high-quality writing services that won’t break the bank.
Academic integrity is at the heart of what we do. Every paper starts from scratch, with original research and writing tailored just for you. We write 100% authentic—no plagiarism research essays. Our strict quality control process includes scanning every draft with top tools like SafeAssign and Turnitin, so you get a similarity score and proof of originality. We’re obsessive about proper citation and referencing too, crediting every source to keep things legit. It’s all about giving you peace of mind with content that meets the highest standards.
When you decide to place an order with Dissertation Writer, here is what happens: