RUA Technology Presentation (NR360)
RUA Technology Presentation (NR360)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduce Technology & Team*Title slide identifies the assigned technology and introduces team members *Provides an introduction *Describes the technology *States purpose(s) for the technology in healthcare. *Establishes the professional tone for the presentation.
20.0 to >18.0 ptsOutstanding
All criteria met and thoroughly explicated.
18.0 to >16.0 ptsVery Good
One (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.
16.0 to >15.0 ptsSatisfactory
One (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.
15.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Three (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistory and Current Use*Describes significant findings that prompted the development of the technology *Discusses the history and current use of the technology in healthcare *Describes three goals of this technology’s implementation.
30.0 to >27.0 ptsOutstanding
All criteria met and thoroughly explicated.
27.0 to >25.0 ptsVery Good
One (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.
25.0 to >22.0 ptsSatisfactory
One (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.
22.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Three (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImpact on Healthcare and Nursing*Impact on professional nursing practice. *Patient safety impact (including statistical justification) *Impact on patient care delivery, quality care measures/monitoring, and risk management (privacy, confidentiality, and security) as applicable. *Ethical & legal considerations. *Infrastructure/ operational consequences (e.g., budget, costs, etc.) *Impact on a population and/or geographic region *Provide examples & statically significant data to support examples.
40.0 to >36.0 ptsOutstanding
Thoroughly describes and accomplishes each criteria.
36.0 to >33.0 ptsVery Good
Describes/accomplishes each criteria.
33.0 to >30.0 ptsSatisfactory
Describes/accomplishes each of the criteria except for one (or more) component.
30.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Describes/accomplishes each of the criteria except for two (or more) component.40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThree Advantages and Disadvantages*Patient’s vantage point or perspective (e.g., patient outcomes, safety, patient/family satisfaction). *Nurse’s vantage point (improves/hinders job efficiency/safety) *Healthcare organization’s vantage point (regulatory compliance, financial, etc.).
40.0 to >36.0 ptsOutstanding
Describes all criteria thoroughly.
36.0 to >33.0 ptsVery Good
Does not adequately describe one of the criteria thoroughly.
33.0 to >30.0 ptsSatisfactory
Does not adequately describe two of the criteria thoroughly.
30.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Does not adequately describe any of the criteria thoroughly.40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeControversy/ Issues/ Challenges/ Regulatory ImplicationsHow might issues surrounding the chosen technology be addressed/solved? *Provide statically significant data or evidence to support your findings.
30.0 to >27.0 ptsOutstanding
Thoroughly describes each element.
27.0 to >25.0 ptsVery Good
Adequately describes each element.
25.0 to >22.0 ptsSatisfactory
Does not adequately describe at least one element.
22.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Does not adequately describe at least two elements.30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary*Key points *Discoveries/surprises *Lessons learned by the team
20.0 to >18.0 ptsOutstanding
Thoroughly summarizes all elements.
18.0 to >16.0 ptsVery Good
One (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.
16.0 to >15.0 ptsSatisfactory
One (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.
15.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Three (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately presented.20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeam Project Assessment*Place & discuss the following questions and responses in the slides(s) following the summary slide and prior to the reference slide(s). *How did the team function well? (e.g., team strengths, team balance, etc.) *What problems did you have interacting as a team? (e.g., team weaknesses, outside challenges, technology, etc.) *What specific actions would you recommend to future teams to help them interact, function, and collaborate successfully?
40.0 to >36.0 ptsOutstanding
Thoroughly meets all criteria.
36.0 to >33.0 ptsVery Good
Adequately summarizes all elements.
33.0 to >30.0 ptsSatisfactory
Does not adequately summarizes one element.
30.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Does not adequately summarizes two or more elements.40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation, Scholarly Writing, & APA Format*25‐30 PowerPoint slides *Submitted to Dropbox/ Turnitin by Team leader only *Speaker Notes *Scholarly writing and APA guidelines *Citations & references *Spelling, grammar, and punctuation *Copyright and plagiarism rules.
20.0 to >18.0 ptsOutstanding
Thoroughly accomplishes all guidelines.
18.0 to >16.0 ptsVery Good
Adequately accomplishes all guidelines.
16.0 to >15.0 ptsSatisfactory
Does not adequately accomplish one or more of the guidelines.
15.0 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Does not adequately accomplish two or more of the guidelines.20.0 pts
Total Points: 240.0
