SOCW 6311 WK 3responses
Reply to a minimum of two colleagues each needs to be answered individually identify first then response
Backside of Kind
Reply to a minimum of two colleagues by doing the entire following:
· Supply an Assessment of their Assessments and subsequent suggestion. Notice each strengths and areas that may very well be improved.
· Determine areas the place your individual unique suggestions or analysis was just like or totally different out of your colleagues’ unique analysis and clarify why.
·
Teacher needs lay out like this:
Reply to a minimum of two colleagues ( 2 friends posts are supplied) by doing the entire following:
Determine strengths of your colleagues’ analyses and areas by which the analyses may very well be improved.
Your response
Deal with his or her analysis of the efficacy and applicability of the evidence-based observe,
Your response
[Evaluate] his or her identification of things that would help or hinder the implementation of the evidence-based observe,
Your response
And [evaluate] his or her answer for mitigating these components.
Your response
Supply extra perception to your colleagues by both figuring out extra components that will help or restrict implementation of the evidence-based observe or another answer for mitigating one of many limitations that your colleagues recognized.
Your response
References
Your response
PEER 1
Cedric Brown
Cedric Brown
RE: Dialogue – Week three
COLLAPSE
Put up an analysis of the proposed research design described within the case research file.
The proposed research design that was described within the case research file was a multiple-baseline, single-subject design. The research was defined to individuals on the geriatric case administration program and knowledgeable consent was required to take part (Plummer, Makris, & Brocksen, 2014). Additionally, the case managers used a ranking scale that branched from the task-centered mannequin. Earlier than each session, the case supervisor and consumer would collaboratively consider how they suppose the duties have been met using a 10-point scale. They might additionally consider the modifications to issues the consumer had on a 10-point scale as effectively (Plummer, Makris, & Brocksen, 2014). Using this could enable each events to see progress and the place they might have to focus extra consideration.
Clarify whether or not the result of Chris’ research along with her consumer George would lead you to undertake the mannequin of case administration with solution-focused and task-centered approaches.
After reviewing the 2 charts that have been supplied within the case research, my remark is that the consumer had made progress within the three areas that have been assessed. I’d undertake the mannequin of case administration with solution-focused and task-centered approaches for a number of causes. One purpose is that this specific analysis challenge yielded optimistic outcomes. It’s a collaborative effort, and when the consumer seems like they’ve stake within the therapy course of, the outcomes are typically higher for the shoppers. Lastly, I really feel as if the usage of the scientific ranking scale permits for a transparent indicator as to why the solution-focused and task-centered strategy is working as proven by the numbers supplied weekly.
Present suggestions for enhancements ought to Chris and her colleagues want to submit the research to the evidence-based observe registry.
One enchancment that I’d recommend that would higher the probabilities with the evidence-based observe registry is to have a particular design research to make the most of. For instance, because the challenge is new, the usage of a One-group Posttest-Solely Design is right as a result of they’re easy and take much less time (Dudley, 2014). This design can also be nice at figuring out if easy solutions affect the intervention (Dudley, 2014). Whether or not they select this design or not, I feel having a constant design will Help construct validity inside the program.
Cedric
Reference
Dudley, J.R. (2014). Social work analysis: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL:
Lyceum Books.
Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. (Eds.). (2014b). Social work case research:
Focus 12 months. Baltimore, MD: Laureate Worldwide Universities Publishing. [Vital
Source e-reader].
Peer 2
Katie Otte
Katie Otte Preliminary Put up-Dialogue – Week three
COLLAPSE
Prime of Kind
Put up an analysis of the proposed research design described within the case research file.
The research design introduced within the case research is a a number of baseline, single-subject design (Plummer, Makris, & Brocksen, 2014b). A single-subject design entails establishing baseline information on the conduct or curiosity of change. Subsequent, an intervention(s) is launched and the conduct or curiosity is noticed to find out if there’s any change (Mattaini, 2010). In a a number of baseline research, multiple curiosity or conduct is being noticed. Within the research design introduced, the social employee selected three pursuits to look at. These embody mobility, residence security, and private care.
The research was finished over a 7 week interval and used a vital ranking scale to measure the duties that have been accomplished every week for every of the areas of curiosity (Plummer, Makris, & Brocksen, 2014b). Moreover, a vital ranking scale was used to measure the success of the areas of change (Plummer, Makris, & Brocksen, 2014b). These have been finished collaboratively with the consumer offering suggestions and the social employee offering remark.
Clarify whether or not the result of Chris’s research along with her consumer George would lead you to undertake the mannequin of case administration with solution-focused and task-centered approaches, and substantiate your alternative.
The result of the research supplied me with satisfactory info to think about using a case administration mannequin with a solution-focused and task-centered strategy. First, I consider the collaborative strategy in choosing the areas of curiosity is essential for general success. Moreover, the research confirmed a correlation between elevated process completions and a rise within the scores for these recognized areas (Plummer, Makris, & Brocksen, 2014b). In response to Thyer Due to this fact, this research confirmed concentrate on duties regarding particular areas resulted in optimistic modifications.
Present suggestions for enhancements ought to Chris and her colleagues want to submit the research to the evidence-based observe registry. Embody a rationale to your suggestions.
I consider the research, as it’s presently designed, doesn’t set up satisfactory rigor which is critical for inclusion within the evidence-based registry. One issue to find out rigor in SSR research is the extent to which different different explanations will be dominated out (Mattaini, 2010). This research, in my view, didn’t rule out different different explanations for the advance in George’s circumstances, subsequently, shouldn’t be included within the registry.
References
Mattaini, M. A. (2010). Single-system research. In B. Thyer (Ed.), The handbook of social work analysis strategies (2nd ed., pp.241–274). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen S. (Eds.). (2014b). Social work case research: Focus 12 months. Baltimore, MD: Laureate Worldwide Universities Publishing. [Vital Source e-reader].
