essay service website
August 2nd, 2023
Financial Statement Analysis Group Project
ACCT 2101 Financial Statement Analysis Group Project November 18, 2022 Purpose: This assignment will introduce you to the concepts of financial statements analysis, help you develop knowledge and skills associated with financial statement analysis, provide a comprehensive example that can be used for application of previously learned concepts and skills, and foster your collaboration and […]
August 2nd, 2023
Assessment 2 – Instructions for Report (Literature review)
SOAD9206 Version July-2022-HM Page 11 of 14 Assessment 2 – Instructions for Report (Literature review) There are several steps involved in the completion of a systematic review. You will be guided though this via information on FLO and during the 3 lectures. You will find many support materials on FLO to guide you. In this […]
August 2nd, 2023
MKTG3014 Assessment Task 2 – Discrete Choice Experiment
MKTG3014 Assessment Task 2 – Discrete Choice Experiment Task Description: This is an individual assessment that requires students to design a Choice-based Conjoint (CBC) study and a Rating-based Conjoint study, and complete an appropriate set of analyses on the data. Type of Collaboration: Individual Length: Maximum 2200 words (excluding Cover-page, Headings, Sub-headings, References, and Appendices) […]
August 2nd, 2023
1 School of Accounting Information Systems and Supply Chain — Business Project Management (BUSM4611) Assessment 3: Project appraisal report Overview Each individual student will work on a supplied project and will answer some specific questions and submit the project appraisal report. The project appraisal report is an opportunity for post-graduate students to demonstrate what they have learned during the semester on project management. Course Learning Outcomes This assessment is linked to the following Course Learning Outcomes: CLO 2 Critically appraise projects using industry standards and methods CLO 4 Substantiate recommendations for enhancing project performance using relevant research Assessment Type: Report, Individual assessment Word limit: 2000 words (reference list included in word count) Due date: Thursday of Week 7, 23:59 (Melbourne time) Weighting: 30% 2 Assessment details Details You are required to develop a project evaluation report based on a case study provided on Canvas. Your project evaluation report will answer four specific questions which are provided with the case study. The project evaluation report is an opportunity for you to demonstrate what you have learned during the semester about project management. You have to write an evaluation report for a project based on a case study on Canvas. In your report evaluating the project, you will answer four questions that come with the case study. The project evaluation report is your chance to show what you’ve learned about the project over the course of the semester. project management. You should answer each question in a logical way and use references from books and academic journals. You should present your answer to each question logically and use references from academic journals and books to substantiate key points. You should cite at least 3 different references in each answer using the RMIT Harvard/Business format. We would like you to demonstrate independent research into project management concepts. Thus, the references provided in the summary case study and the course text are not included in the minimum 3 references required for each answer. You may cite them, but your answers should focus on project management concepts, practice and evidence-based solutions that respond to the question rather than a detailed description of issues evident in the case. The requirement to use three project management references beyond those provided with the case and the course text is noted as 3 new references in the assessment rubric. The assessment criteria noted in the rubric specifies originality. This means you must avoid over reliance on quotations in your answer. You are encouraged to paraphrase sources wherever possible and to compare and contrast sources to demonstrate critical analysis of the issues. Some of the answers are matters of opinion and you will need to study the literature for ways to approach them. To support your answer, you can refer to project management books, PMBOK, peer reviewed journal articles and authenticated sources. This assignment must be presented in a word document containing 4 numbered sections. The section number should correspond to the question being answered. E.g. 1-4. You must also include a RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list at the close of your submission. No title sheet, introduction, conclusion or executive summary is required. You just need to answer the four questions and include a reference list. Submit your report via the Turnitin submission point on Canvas. It is your responsibility to ensure your report has a satisfactory Turnitin result when you submit. This means you should submit early to allow time to read, interpret results, and to fix any issues that are evident. Usually, it should record a matching score of less than 20%. We are using a common set of questions so in some circumstances a higher score may be acceptable providing only common elements are highlighted (e.g. Section headings/name of the case). Where whole sentences or significant portions of sentences are highlighted, try to paraphrase to reduce similarity when resubmitting your report. Do not copy and paste the case summary, case study report or case references without citing sources in accordance with the RMIT Harvard/Business format. When you refer to the case, ensure you cite the relevant source. All text copied from a source must appear in quotation marks with a citation. All paraphrased text based on a source must include a relevant citation to demonstrate your research. A whole list of references being highlighted as coming from a single source is also problematic whereas a multi coloured reference list is usually OK. Familiarise yourself with how to use Turnitin to check the originality of your submission via the Turnitin submission point on Canvas. Make sure you check your work well in advance of the submission due date. Always ask your tutor if you are concerned about Turnitin results. Only upload one word file containing your report. Do not upload or include a cover sheet in your submission. It is not necessary as uploading to Turnitin indicates your agreement to the terms of assessment submission. 3 Referencing guidelines You must acknowledge all the sources of information you have used in your assessments. Please use RMIT Harvard referencing style for this assignment. Please visit RMIT library referencing page for more tools such as EndNote, referencing tutorials and referencing guides for printing. Submission format Upload as one (1) single file to Turnitin via the link below. Make sure the file type is an accepted format. For further information, refer to the Turnitin guide . Academic integrity and plagiarism Academic integrity is about honest presentation of your academic work. It means acknowledging the work of others while developing your own insights, knowledge and ideas. You should take extreme care that you have: − Acknowledged words, data, diagrams, models, frameworks and/or ideas of others you have quoted (i.e. directly copied), summarised, paraphrased, discussed or mentioned in your assessment through the appropriate referencing methods, − Provided a reference list of the publication details so your reader can locate the source if necessary. This includes material taken from Internet sites. If you do not acknowledge the sources of your material, you may be accused of plagiarism because you have passed off the work and ideas of another person without appropriate referencing, as if they were your own. RMIT University treats plagiarism as a very serious offence constituting misconduct. Plagiarism covers a variety of inappropriate behaviours, including: − Failure to properly document a source − Copyright material from the internet or databases − Collusion between students For further information on our policies and procedures, please refer to the University website. Assessment declaration When you submit work electronically, you agree to the assessment declaration. Use RMIT Business (Harvard Style) for this assessment. 4 Assessment Criteria Criteria Ratings Pts HD D C P N Question 1 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 Question 2 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. 5 beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. The answer is of a professional standard. support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good. those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 Question 3 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. The answer is of a professional standard. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 6 Question 4 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. The answer is of a professional standard. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 Reference list and length An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. Presentation is of a professional standard. An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. One or two minor issues are noted but presentation is very good. An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. Some issues are noted but presentation is good. An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. Several issues are noted but presentation is satisfactory. References are incomplete/missing or incorrectly formatted and/or the report does not meet length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 2 to >1.59 Pts 1.59 to >1.39 Pts 1.39 to >1.19 Pts 1.19 to >0.99 Pts 0.99 to >0 Pts 2 Total: 30 pts
1 School of Accounting Information Systems and Supply Chain — Business Project Management (BUSM4611) Assessment 3: Project appraisal report Overview Each individual student will work on a supplied project and will answer some specific questions and submit the project appraisal report. The project appraisal report is an opportunity for post-graduate students to demonstrate what they […]
August 2nd, 2023
MSc in Project Management Session: 2022/2023 Semester: SEM1 Module Number: 7503BEQR Module Title: Project Management Fundamentals Type of Coursework: CW2-Report (weight: 70%) Module Leader: Dr Waiel SAID ASSIGNMENT BRIEF – CW2 Report This module assignment has two components: 1) a presentation, and 2) a report. This Assignment Brief is focused on the second assignment, the report only (coursework 2; CW2, as mentioned hereunder in Table 1). The report should be submitted anonymously and should just contain your student ID number. Please make sure you do not have your name anywhere on the report pages. The following dates are for Cohort MScPM8 (with Dr Waiel Said), for Cohort MSc PM9, students have to confirm with Lecturer: Mr. Mohammed. M. Mousoof: Table 1. 7503BEQR CW2 Report Assignment, characteristics and submission details. Submission Date Length Weighting Learning Outcomes Report 15-Nov-2022 (23:59) 4000 words (+/- 10%) 70% 1-5 The report needs to be submitted electronically through CANVAS. Text included within visual aids (e.g. tables, figures, charts, etc.) does not contribute to the overall wordcount. a. Assignment Brief (CW2) Report – 4000 words (+/-10%) Report Assignment Background You are employed in a sector of your choice as a project manager and your team has just completed the delivery of a pilot project for one of your clients. A successful completion of this pilot project can lead to securing a much larger contract for your company with the same client. As the project manager of this pilot project you now need to produce an end-of-project report, which will, firstly, evaluate the performance of the pilot project in relation to the original plan, and, secondly, lead to generation of long-term strategic recommendations for similar larger projects, based on lessons learnt from this pilot project. b. Report Assignment Aim The aim of this assignment is to prepare an end-of-project report that assesses and evaluates the delivery of the pilot project and offers recommendations about delivering similar future projects on a larger scale. 2 Within your assignment you will demonstrate an understanding of project planning and implementation by developing a project plan and utilising it for monitoring and controlling the project. Assignment Questions: (i) Prepare an end-of-project report that reflects on the overall endeavour in planning, managing, and delivering the project along with a critical assessment and evaluation of the factors that facilitated the delivery of the pilot project. (ii) Critically examine project performance and offer recommendations about delivering similar future projects on a larger scale. (iii) Evaluate strategic recommendations regarding project or programme management for the future. The report structure is outlined on the next page. The marking criteria are summarised in Table 2 and marking ranges and characteristics in Table 3. Please familiarise yourself with both; the marking ranges and characteristics, as this may help you achieve your desired marks. Table 2. 7503BEQR CW2 Report marking criteria. Assignment objectives and marking criteria Mark % 1. To identify the underpinning principles and concepts of project management. 15% 2. To analyse and evaluate the project management concepts and principles in context of the pilot project plan by critically evaluating the project’s performance. 40% 3. To demonstrate how the pilot project will inform the strategic recommendations regarding project or programme management for the future. 25% 4. To use relevant visual aids to support the analysis and evaluation of the management of the pilot project and its overall integration. 10% 5. To appropriately structure the report, to ensure that attention has been paid to grammar and spelling, to ensure the legibility of all visual aids, and to accurately 3. To demonstrate how the results of the pilot project will be incorporated into the strategic recommendations for future project or program management. 25% 4. In order to support the analysis and assessment of the management of the pilot project and its overall integration, the appropriate visual aids should be utilized. 10% 5. To appropriately structure the report, to guarantee that care has been made to grammar and spelling, to guarantee that all visual aids are legible, and to accurately mention all sources in the report. reference all sources of information, including literature, online sources and visual aids (please see https://www.ljmu.ac.uk/microsites/library/skills ljmu/referencing-and-endnote). 10% The report should answer the following questions as a minimum: ▪ What is/was the project aiming to achieve? ▪ Why is/was it important to achieve it? ▪ How will be/was the project undertaken? The report itself should demonstrate analytical and evaluation skills in discussion of the topic and a clear understanding of strategic project management issues. In order to avoid failing, please do not overuse bullet points, or do not submit just a literature review, as you are required to evaluate a specific project case for the purpose of this report. Number all pages. 3 Structure of the report All reports should contain: Title page: giving the following information: ▪ The full title of the work ▪ Your student ID number ▪ The award for which the project is submitted in partial fulfilment of its requirements ▪ The year of submission ▪ The word count (excluding acknowledgements, diagrams, references, bibliography and appendices) Confidentiality statement: If there are genuine reasons why your work could be considered confidential then you should discuss this matter with your Module Leader (Optional). Acknowledgements: A list of people who provided help to the author during the research and writing of the project (Optional). Executive summary: A brief summary of the aim, methodology, contents, and conclusions of the report. This section is not included in the word count, but should be no longer than 400 words. Glossary: A list of abbreviations, key phrases and technical terms used in the report and their definitions (Optional). List of contents: A breakdown of the project into its constituent parts and locating them by page number. It is good practice to also include a list of figures, tables and, if applicable, appendices. Introduction: Presenting and justifying the pilot project (business case) and introducing the approach taken to delivering the project objectives and their alignment with the broader organisational strategy. Body of the report: This part should be arranged in a way appropriate to the topic, presenting a review of relevant literature, results and discussions and a synthesis of relevant findings, critical analysis of facts and/or ideas, using chapter headings, with paragraphs and spacing for ease of reading and cross-reference. Conclusions and recommendations: An assessment of the findings along with any recommendations; this section should, explicitly or implicitly, establish the validity of the work in relation to its field. References: Harvard format citation system must be used for in-text citations and the “References” section at the end of the report. Check ‘How to cite references’ in the Library 4 website. Research and referencing grades will be reduced, if Harvard format is not followed. (Please see https://www.ljmu.ac.uk/microsites/library/skills-ljmu/referencing-and-endnote). Appendices: Optional; this section should be used only for information, which is supplementary to the assignment; it should not be used for any information, which is key to the assignment. PLAGIARISM ‘Plagiarism is the practice of presenting thoughts, writings or other output of another or others as original, without acknowledgement of their source(s). All material used to support a piece of work, whether a printed publication or from electronic media, should be appropriately identified and referenced and should not normally be copied directly unless as an acknowledged quote. Text translated into the words of the individual student should in all cases acknowledge the source.’ For further information please contact the LJMU Library. Before submitting the work, you should check through it to ensure that: ▪ all material that has been identified as originally from a previously published source has been properly attributed by the inclusion of an appropriate reference in the text ▪ direct quotations are marked as such (using “quotation marks” at the beginning and end of the selected text) ▪ a citation has been included in the list of references. COLLUSION This report is an individual assessment and not group work. If you decide to study with another student, you must ensure that the final submission from each student is totally unique. If the work shows significant signs of similarity it will be picked up in TurnitIn and you may be cited for plagiarism. Note University Regulations for Personal Circumstances apply if you miss the presentation or submission deadline. Any problems should be notified in advance of the presentation date to the Module Leader. Academic regulations for Post Graduate programmes PG.C2.3 state: “Coursework, which is submitted late (except where there is an agreed extension) will be recorded as a non-submission. There is also a penalty for deviating substantially from the word length. If you, for genuine reasons, are unable to meet the hand-in date, please complete an extension request form, seek verification from your Personal Tutor and inform the Module Leader.” 5 Table 3. Grade Descriptors. Grade descriptors for Level 7 written work Mark range Characteristic Criteria 90-100 Exceptional Pass Exemplary attainment of all learning outcomes Demonstrates an outstanding synthesis of varied theoretical positions in the analysis of key issues in the subject area Wide-ranging emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at the forefront of the discipline Offers an exhaustive exploration of the literature and evidence base The material covered is accurate and relevant The argument is highly sophisticated The standard of writing is refined No errors in the use of the specified referencing system Well-presented and organised in an appropriate academic style. 80-89 Outstanding Pass Excellent attainment of all learning outcomes, with some met to an exemplary standard Demonstrates a comprehensive synthesis of varied theoretical positions in the analysis of key issues in the subject area. Wide-ranging emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at the forefront of the discipline Extends far beyond expected levels of engagement with the literature and evidence-base The material covered is accurate and relevant The argument is generally very astute The standard of writing is refined No errors in the use of the specified referencing system Well-presented and organised in an appropriate academic style. 70-79 Excellent Pass Excellent attainment of all learning outcomes Demonstrates a thorough synthesis of varied theoretical positions in the analysis of key issues in the subject area Strong emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at the forefront of the discipline Thorough use the literature and evidence-base The material covered is accurate and relevant The argument is persuasive and there are very perceptive elements The standard of writing is refined No errors in the use of the specified referencing system Well-presented and organised in an appropriate academic style. 60-69 Good Pass Good attainment of all learning outcomes 6 Demonstrates detailed synthesis of varied theoretical positions in the analysis of key issues in the subject area Good emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at the forefront of the discipline Good consideration of the literature and evidence-base that develops from recommended readings The material covered is accurate and relevant The argument is persuasive The standard of writing is refined No errors in the use of the specified referencing system Well-presented and organised in an appropriate academic style. 50-59 Pass Adequate attainment of all learning outcomes Demonstrates a limited, but sufficient, synthesis of varied theoretical positions in the analysis of key issues in the subject area Some emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at the forefront of the discipline Sufficient consideration of the literature and evidence-base, but little consideration beyond recommended readings The material covered is mostly accurate and relevant The argument is straightforward and relatively clear The standard of writing is well clear and readable, with some sophisticated phrasing No errors in the use of the specified referencing system Well-presented and organised in an appropriate academic style. 40-49 Needs Some Improvement Meets most, but not all learning outcomes Demonstrates limited synthesis of varied theoretical positions in the analysis of key issues in the subject area Less than expected emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at the forefront of the discipline Basic consideration of the literature and evidence-base, but restricted to recommended readings Some inaccuracies or irrelevant materials that suggest confusion and misunderstanding The argument is relatively clear, although some elements are difficult to understand The standard of writing is well clear and readable, but overly simplistic Minor errors in the use of the specified referencing system, but meets key principles Well-presented and organised in an appropriate academic style. 30-39 Needs Improvement Approximately half the learning outcomes are met Demonstrates very little synthesis of varied theoretical positions in the analysis of key issues in the subject area Little emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at the forefront of the discipline 7 Minor consideration of the literature and evidence-base, with inadequate use of recommended reading and no exploration outside that Some materials is accurate, but the amount of inaccurate or irrelevant materials indicates insufficient understanding of key concepts The argument is poorly defined and defended The standard of writing is mostly clear and readable Some errors in the use of the specified referencing system, but meets key principles Generally well presented and organised, but does not always conform to conventions of academic presentation 20-29 Needs Significant Revision Most learning outcomes are not met Demonstrates no synthesis of varied theoretical positions in the analysis of key issues in the subject area Little or no emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at the forefront of the discipline Superficial consideration of the literature and evidence-base There are major inaccuracies or significant amounts of irrelevant material The argument is very weak The standard of writing is reasonable and there are very few areas of confusion and/or errors in spelling/grammar Attempts to use of the specified referencing system. Meets key principles, but there are systematic errors Good presentation that may include some organisational errors and/or tendency not to conform to conventions of academic presentation. 0-19 Needs Substantial work Does not meet any learning outcomes Demonstrates misunderstanding of varied theoretical positions in the analysis of key issues in the subject area No emphasis on knowledge and ideas that are at the forefront of the discipline No engagement with the literature and evidence-base The material covered is inaccurate or irrelevant The argument is incoherent Standard of writing is acceptable. The structure is reasonable, but there are some areas of confusion and/or some errors in spelling/grammar Attempts to use the specified referencing system, but there are significant errors Acceptable presentation that may include some organisational errors and a tendency not to conform to conventions of academic presentation. PART A: ACADEMIC ESSAY (2000 WORDS) Introduction (1000 words) The planning and design of a worldwide icon Burj Khalifa Academic essay: Overall endeavor in planning, managing and delivering of the project (1000) • Architectural works • Testing of the wind tunnel • Floor layout • Interior works • Art work • Construction and its details Evaluation of the factors that facilitated the pilot project delivery: • Industrial awareness and linkages • Community collaboration PART B: RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE FUTURE DELIVERY OF THE SIMILAR PROJECT (1700 words) • Project performance and recommendations • Evaluation of strategic recommendations regarding the erection of Burj Khalifa Conclusion (300 words) It will cover the summary of the reactions of the people globally
MSc in Project Management Session: 2022/2023 Semester: SEM1 Module Number: 7503BEQR Module Title: Project Management Fundamentals Type of Coursework: CW2-Report (weight: 70%) Module Leader: Dr Waiel SAID ASSIGNMENT BRIEF – CW2 Report This module assignment has two components: 1) a presentation, and 2) a report. This Assignment Brief is focused on the second assignment, the […]
August 2nd, 2023
Assignment 3: Digital Clinical Experience: Comprehensive
Assignment 3: Digital Clinical Experience: Comprehensive (Head-to-Toe) Physical Assessment NURS 6512N-32 Comprehensive (Head-to-Toe) Physical Assessment Throughout this course, you were encouraged to practice conducting various physical assessments on multiple areas of the body, ranging from the head to the toes. Each of Assignment 3 Digital Clinical Experience Comprehensive (Head-to-Toe) Physical Assessment NURS 6512N-32 these assessments, […]
August 2nd, 2023
Self-assessment of your financial literacy
To Prepare: Begin by completing a free self-assessment of your financial literacy. You may choose your own or use the one provided in this week’s Learning Resources. (Note: If you use the one provided, please select Prefer not to say when asked for your zip code unless you live in Canada.) Then, watch the media […]
August 2nd, 2023
CPCCBC4004 Assessment Assignment
Unit Assessment Pack (UAP) – Cover Sheet Student and Trainer/Assessor Details Student ID Student name Contact number Email address Trainer/Assessor name Course and Unit Details Course code CPC50220 Course name Diploma of Building and Construction (Building) Unit code CPCCBC4004 Unit name Identify and produce estimated cost for building and construction projects Assessment Submission Method ☐ […]
August 2nd, 2023
ICT 205 Mobile Application Development Assessment
Assessment (3): Details and Submission Guidelines Semester 1 Unit Code ICT 205 Unit Title Mobile Application Development Assessment Type Group Assessment Assessment Title Android Application Development Purpose of the assessment(with ULO Mapping) ULO 1. Apply web knowledge to the development of mobile applications ULO 2. Design user interface for touch screen applications ULO 3. Build […]
August 2nd, 2023
Assessment 1 – Knowledge Questions
Assessment 1 – Knowledge Questions Assessment task description: • This is the first (1) assessment task you must successfully complete to be deemed competent in this unit of competency. • The Knowledge Test is comprised of nine (9) written questions • You must respond to all questions and submit them to your Trainer/Assessor. • You […]
Get the best online study research writing help services with your assignment papers 24/7! Try us now!
Place an order | Check price