Marking Standards
The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 20% of the overall unit mark.
Marking Standards
Not Passable (Zero-49% of the criterion mark)
Passable (50-64, of the criterion mark)
Good (65-74% of the criterion mark)
Very Good (75-84, of the criterion mark)
Glorious (85400% of the criterion mark)
Relevance of the critique (30 marks)
the subject p-ompts, and don’t prolong data. amplify or discover the subject in any significant method
tackle the subject prompts, and may do way more to increase data, amplify and discover the subject in additional element
subject prompts, however may do extra to increase data, amplify and discover the subject in additional
Critiques tackle the subject prompts, prolong data or amplify of discover the subject in additional element
int■ques tackle the subject prompts instantly, prolong data, amplify and discover the subject in important element.
High quality of the expression and supply of the critiques (20 Mar.)
No opinions or concepts expressed. Poor Pruanncutrt.i:r7n”rngaialcd
posts.
Opinions and concepts are unclear and missing in Help. A number of grammar, spelling or punctuation errors.
Opinions and concepts are clearly acknowledged with an occasional lack of supporting proof. Few grammar, spelling or punctuation errors.
Opinions are expressed in a transparent, concise and well-supported method. No grammar, spelling or punctuation errors.
Contributions add important worth to the discussions, are considerate, well-written and contribute related extra assets and views
Proof-based critique (20 Marks)
Critiques will not be supported by proof, and claims are made with none supporting proof
Critiques are sometimes supported by proof, and many claims are made with out the Help of proof
Critiques are generally supported by proof, nevertheless generally the proof for claims being made is lack,
Cf;ecvliudesnacrees:luT:17″‘ acceptable.
Critiques are strongly supported by proof the place acceptable.
Presentation is structured and case “11.’1 regp7odpo’sred analysis. (30 marks)
The critique is just not
aacncdet°,`,:bcI:sseT:tur’
endeavor the proposed analysis is just not acceptably addressed Restricted show of media proven.
The critique is acceptably rructurecad’ea” orLndera endeavor proposed analysis is acceptably addressed. Restricted show of media proven.
The critique is generally Iotrructu’u’enddert and endeavor T the case e proposed analysis is generally addressed. Ample show of media proven.
The critique is properly d t rorructuLrFileddetnaki„hge cath:
proposed analysis is properly addressed. Robust show of media proven.
The critique is properly
satcrldjeus=tanedceaxseceffioer””Y endeavor theproposed analysis. Glorious show of media proven.
AssignmentTutorOnline
————-
Standards for Analysis
The assessment will be graded out of 100 factors and will account for 20% of the overall unit grade.
Standards for Analysis
Not adequate (Zero-49 p.c of the criterion mark)
a passable outcome (50-64, of the criterion mark)
Excellent (65-74 p.c of the criterion mark)
Glorious (75-84, of the criterion mark)
Distinctive (85400 p.c of the criterion mark)
The critique’s relevance (30 marks)
The subject p-ompts moderately than increasing data. enlarge or examine the difficulty in any method that’s significant
tackle the prompts, and may do much more to increase data, enlarge, and go additional into the subject.
subject prompts, however there may be extra that may be completed to increase data, enlarge, and examine the difficulty in larger depth.
Critiques tackle the subject prompts, prolong data or amplify of discover the
