I want a cowl sheet for this I want the title and my identify is Bobby Pearson. My trainer’s identify is Dr. Aurelio Givens. The course is Hum 111. The date is Dec 1 2015. Please embody the quilt web page. Additionally be sure it in APA format Assignment 2: Undertaking Paper –Comparative EssayDue Week Eight and price 200 pointsThis “Assignment 2” writing assignment is a comparative essay focused on topicsGrading for this assignment can be primarily based on reply high quality, logic / group of the paper, and language and writing abilities, utilizing the next rubric.Factors: 200Assignment 2:Undertaking Paper–Comparative EssayCriteriaUnacceptable Under 60% FMeets Minimal Expectations 60-69% DFair 70-79% CProficient 80-89% BExemplary 90-100% A1. The extent to which the directions have been adopted.Weight: 15%Didn’t submit or incompletely adopted directions.Insufficiently adopted directions.Partially adopted directions.Satisfactorily adopted directions.Totally adopted directions.2. The institution of a clear thesis and the extent to which all components within the subject have been addressed.Weight: 20%Didn’t submit or incompletely established a thesis or handle all components within the subject.Insufficiently established a thesis or addressed all components within the subject.Partially established a thesis and addressed all components within the subject.Satisfactorily established a clear thesis and addressed all components within the subject.Totally established a clear thesis and addressed all components within the subject.Three. The adequacy of knowledge, particular examples, and particulars which Help the overall thesis.Weight: 20%Didn’t submit or incompletely supplied satisfactory data, particular examples, and particulars which Help the overall declare or most important thought.Insufficiently supplied satisfactory data, particular examples, and particulars which Help the overall declare or most important thought.Partially supplied satisfactory data, particular examples, and particulars which Help the overall declare or most important thought.Satisfactorily supplied data, particular examples, and particulars which Help the overall declare or most important thought.Totally supplied data, particular examples, and particulars which Help the overall declare or most important thought.Four. The coherent group of the factors of comparability and the paper total, with related content material and persuasive presentation.Weight: 20%Didn’t submit or incompletely supplied coherentorganization of the factors of comparability and the paper total, with related content material and persuasive presentation.Insufficiently supplied coherentorganization of the factors of comparability and the paper total, with related content material and persuasive presentation.Partially supplied coherentorganization of the factors of comparability and the paper total, with related content material and persuasive presentation.Satisfactorily supplied coherentorganization of the factors of comparability and the paper total, with related content material and persuasive presentation.Thoroughlyprovided coherentorganization of the factors of comparability and the paper total, with very related content material and persuasive presentation.5. Three references minimal quantity and qualityWeight: 5percentNo references providedDoes not meet the required variety of references; all references poor high quality selections.Doesn’t meet the required variety of references; some references poor high quality selections.Meets variety of required references; all references prime quality selections.Exceeds variety of required references; all references prime quality selections.6. Readability, writing mechanics, referencing, and APA formatting necessities, together with a reference listing and matching in-text citations. Weight: 20%Greater than Eight errors current and issues of readability and mechanics and correct APA formatting.7-Eight errors current and a few issues of readability and mechanics and correct APA formatting.5-6 errors current and few issues of readability and mechanics and correct APA formatting.Three-Four errors current however usually good readability and good mechanics and APA formatting.Zero-2 errors current and wonderful readability and mechanics and APA formatting.encountered in our HUM 111 class. The mission can be primarily based on analysis however will replicate your views and interpretation of the subject. This mission is designed that can Help you stretch your thoughts and your skills as an organized, revolutionary, and important thinker. If approached correctly, it also needs to be enjoyable!Select one (1) of the topics from the listing of subject selections under. Learn the subject rigorously. Write a three to 4 (Three-Four) web page paper (750-1,000 phrases) that follows directions and covers every a part of the subject. (The title web page and References listing don’t get included on this phrase depend).Notice: Your teacher might require you to submit your subject alternative for approval earlier than the tip of Week 5.For the subject you select:Set up a clear thesis about your subject as a part of the introductory paragraph (typically the thesis is the very last thing one determines after doing the essential analysis and description; nevertheless it is going to be positioned within the first paragraph of your paper).This is a comparative essay. Comparability approached correctly would require some crucial considering on your half. Use a point-by-point strategy for the essay. Meaning, if evaluating topic A with topic B, do not do the primary half of the essay on topic A after which the second half on topic B–that will seem to be two (2) separate essays and comparisons will are likely to get misplaced. As a substitute, you ought to be mentioning each topics in most of your paragraphs as you evaluate them all through the essay. Comparisons will establish similarities in addition to contrasts.Don’t attempt to do the whole lot on your two (2) topics. You need to find yourself narrowing your focus to a few insights and points concerning the topics being in contrast. And, from these pretty particular factors of comparability, you’ll develop a thesis and glean some classes.Observe intently the directions under on your particular subject.Embrace a concluding paragraph on the finish. This paragraph will, not directly, refer again to the thesis established in your first paragraph, since now you’ve got demonstrated and supported it. It might be right here that you simply additionally embody your observations relating your examine to the fashionable office or society (see your subject). Attempt to end with aptitude!Use not less than three (Three) good high quality educational sources, with one (1) supply being the category textual content.Notice: Wikipedia and different related Web sites don’t qualify as educational sources. You might be extremely inspired to make use of the Useful resource Middle tab on the prime of your Blackboard web page.Subject Selections – Select only one (1) of the topics under:Qualities of the Hero: Evaluating Gilgamesh and Odysseus. Write an essay evaluating these two (2) heroic figures from historic epics of various cultures, particularly focusing your Assessment on the sources about their encounters with monsters: Gilgamesh encounters the monster guarding the forest, Humbaba, in Tablets Three-5 of theEpic of Gilgamesh (see http://www.ancienttexts.org/library/mesopotamian/gilgamesh/; scroll all the way down to the Pill hyperlinks; consider “Pill” numbers like chapter numbers).” Odysseus encounters Polyphemus the Cyclops in Ebook 9 of The Odyssey (see http://www.theoi.com/Textual content/HomerOdyssey9.html; from line 105 to the tip). Your paper ought to:a) Examine Gilgamesh and Odysseus as to their heroic qualities, noting similarities and variations, utilizing particular examples from the epics.b) Summarize what this means about variations between historic Mesopotamian and Greek cultures of their beliefs and expectations.c) From this comparability, recommend ways in which present cultural beliefs and expectations form trendy notions about position fashions and heroes.Confucius and Aristotle on Advantage. Write an essay evaluating these two (2) historic thinkers on the idea of advantage or good moral character and conduct. Keep focused on the difficulty; hold any biographical or different data brief or restricted. As a lot as potential, analyze their writings (in translation, after all), utilizing Confucius’ Analects(athttp://classics.mit.edu/Confucius/analects.html ) and Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics(athttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.html ). Your paper ought to:a) Examine the teachings of Confucius and Aristotle on what constitutes advantage or good moral character and conduct, noting similarities and variations in particular concepts or emphasis.b) Think about what your findings recommend about variations between historic Chinese language and historic Greek tradition.c) From this comparability, recommend concepts of advantage that may apply to ethics in a trendy setting, reminiscent of a numerous office.Evaluating Sculptures of Historical India and Greece. Write an essay evaluating the best way gods and people have been depicted in sculpture in historic India and Greece, and establish the cultural values and beliefs that these artwork works replicate in every case. Your paper ought to:a) Utilizing particular examples, evaluate the best way gods and other people have been depicted within the sculptures of historic India and Greece, noting similarities and variations.b) Determine the cultural values and beliefs that these artwork works replicate for every society.c) From this comparability, recommend a trendy state of affairs of creative expression and the methods it displays or counters prevailing cultural values.Evaluating Historical Skeptics. Write an essay evaluating Lucretius and Wang Chong (=Wang Ch’ung), skeptical philosophers of historic Rome and China. They have been skeptical about in style non secular and non secular beliefs and widely-held superstitions. Lucretius was an Epicurean thinker of Roman tradition (Chapter 6). Wang Ch’ung was a thinker in historic Chinese language tradition (Chapter 7). Focus your comparability on their writings as discovered athttp://www.humanistictexts.org/lucretius.htm and http://www.humanistictexts.org/wangchung.htm#On Not Flying to Heaven. Your paper ought to:a) Utilizing examples from their writings, evaluate these two (2) thinkers on their views about particular topics and on their strategy in explaining and expressing their skepticism.b) From this comparability, establish in style beliefs in every tradition that appear related and those who appear totally different.c) From this comparability, recommend any trendy state of affairs wherein materialist skeptics confront non secular and non secular beliefs, and remark on the issues of free expression and cultural respect.Evaluating Historical Male Rulers. Take any two (2) of those rulers and write an essay evaluating them: Ramses II, Shihuangdi, Constantine, Ashoka, Pericles, or Charlemagne. Choose rulers from totally different cultures. You might also suggest (for approval or not) a ruler not listed. Keep away from prolonged quoting or prolonged shut paraphrasing from biographical sources. Make it YOUR comparative Assessment. Your paper ought to:a) Examine the 2 (2) rulers by way of their state of affairs and strategies of rule and their obvious beliefs and practices, noting similarities and variations. Use particular examples.b) Think about what your examine suggests concerning the cultures over which they dominated, figuring out any similarities and variations between the cultures.c) From this comparability, recommend classes about several types of efficient management on the earth of recent enterprise and / or trendy politics.Evaluating Historical Feminine Rulers. Examine the Tang Empress Wu Zetian (often known as Empress Wu or as Wu Zhao; dominated China round 690-705 AD) with both the Pharaoh Cleopatra (dominated Egypt round 51-31 BC) or the Pharaoh Hatshepsut (dominated Egypt round 1478-1458 BC). You might also suggest (for approval or not) a feminine ruler not listed. Keep away from prolonged quoting or prolonged shut paraphrasing from biographical sources. Make it YOUR comparative Assessment. Your paper ought to:a) Examine the 2 (2) rulers by way of their state of affairs and ascent to energy, their strategies of rule, and their achievements and resourcefulness, noting similarities and variations. Use particular examples.b) Think about what your examine suggests concerning the cultures over which they dominated, figuring out any similarities and variations between the cultures.c) From this comparability, recommend classes about several types of efficient management by a feminine on the earth of recent enterprise and / or trendy politics.Different subject alternative utilizing a comparative strategy (proposed by pupil or teacher) and permitted by the professor and supported by the grading rubric.The Undertaking Paper can be graded on:The extent to which the directions have been adopted for the paper usually and for the precise subject.The institution of a clear thesis about your subject.The adequacy and relevance of knowledge, examples, and particulars which Help the overall thesis.Overlaying every a part of the subject as instructed, together with the comparisons, the consideration of historic cultural variations, and the reflection on classes for contemporary society or the fashionable office.The standard of your analysis and your persuasiveness utilizing crucial reasoning.The use and acknowledgement of a minimal of three (Three) required references (the category textbook plus not less than two (2) different high quality educational sources) documented utilizing the APA type –together with each using a correct References listing and using correct in-text citations.Adherence to straightforward guidelines of grammar, punctuation, paragraphing, and mechanics, and basic readability of presentation.Your assignment should comply with these formatting necessities:Be typed, double spaced, utilizing Occasions New Roman font (measurement 12), with one-inch margins on all sides. Each in-text citations and a References listing are required. Citations and references should comply with APA type format. Verify along with your professor for any further directions particular to the chosen subject. (Notice: College students can discover APA type supplies positioned within the course shell for steering).Embrace a cowl web page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s identify, the professor’s identify, the course title, and the date. The quilt web page and the reference web page will not be included within the required web page size. For our functions, chances are you’ll omit any summary web page.The precise course studying outcomes related to this assignment are:Clarify how key social, cultural, and creative contributions contribute to historic adjustments.Clarify the significance of situating a society’s cultural and creative expressions inside a historic context.Study the influences of mental, non secular, political, and socio-economic forces on social, cultural, and creative expressions.Determine main historic developments in world cultures through the eras of antiquity to the Renaissance.Use expertise and knowledge sources to analysis points within the examine of world cultures.Write clearly and concisely about world cultures utilizing correct writing mechanics.Click on right here to view the grading rubric.

Published by

Essays

View all posts