CASE TOPIC: United Plane Company v FCT (1943) 68 CLR 52

Standards: Written Case Analysis

Most Mark: 25%

Standards 1: 10%

Clear and concise assertion of the related details and authorized problem(s) within the case
Demonstrated hyperlinks to acceptable readings
Standards 2: 10%
Clear and concise expression of personal concepts in regards to the case utilizing acceptable authorized language that is freed from error
Cautious organisation in order that concepts develop logically via the presentation
Considerate Assessment of the judgement(s)
Standards three: 5%

Applicable use of major and secondary authorized sources.
Thoroughness of analysis and preparation as evident within the written report.
Administration of personal workload to satisfy presentation deadline (self-assessment: to self-check your efficient administration of time to deal with college workloads and deadlines).

United Plane Company v FCT (1943) 68 CLR 52 CASE TOPIC

Written Case Analysis is among the standards.

Most Share: 25%

10% is the primary criterion.

The related details and authorized problem(s) within the case are acknowledged clearly and concisely.

Hyperlinks to acceptable readings have been demonstrated.

10% is the second criterion.

Use acceptable authorized language to precise private ideas in regards to the problem in a transparent and succinct method.

Cautious planning ensures that concepts circulate easily all through the presentation.

An in-depth examination of the choice (s)

5% is the third criterion.

Applicable use of major and secondary authorized sources.

Thoroughness of analysis and preparation as evident within the written report.

Administration of personal workload to satisfy presentation deadline (self-assessment: to self-check your efficient administration of time to deal with college workloads and deadlines).

Published by
Medical
View all posts