American Literature
Topic researched literature on either the whale rider, the storyteller or Puerto Rico strong
In this course you are expected to write two researched literary analysis papers. You may choose which form of paper you want to write (interdisciplinary, comparative, define & demonstrate, close reading, etc.) and which text(s) you want to write about However, you may not write about any particular text in more than one paper.
These papers should be 5-7 pages (1500-2000 words) and include 5-7 sources (including primary & secondary).
At the end of the semester, you may rewrite one of these two papers for an improved grade, but only if that paper was submitted at least two weeks before the big deadline.
Rubric
Research Paper Rubric
Research Paper Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar & Usage
Are there many Dirty Dozen errors? Are the sentences clear and expressive? Is the writer’s voice apparent, or at least developing? Are there many word choice errors, malapropisms, or awkward phrases? Is the paper representative of formal academic writing or of casual speech?
25 pts
Full Marks
Clear, clean, expressive style. Appropriate academic tone. Pleasant to read.
20 pts
Well Done
Some Dirty Dozen & mechanical errors, but they don’t have a strong impact on readability. Appropriate academic tone
15 pts
Satisfactory
Many & more severe errors; informal tone.
10 pts
inadequate work
Many errors that impair comprehension. Inappropriate tone.
0 pts
No Marks
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStructure & Research
Is there a clear thesis statement? Are the paragraphs, including the introduction and conclusion, well-developed and well-structured? Is there a clear reason why the paragraphs are arranged as they are, or is there a disturbing randomness to this argument? Does the writer observe the conventions of their chosen style guide? Are quotations and other uses of reference material properly introduced, cited, and discussed? Does the paper handle material appropriately, avoiding plagiarism?
25 pts
Full Marks
Clear thesis. Well-written paragraphs that are organized in a way that structures the argument. Paper uses original language. Well-researched and well-sourced. Primary and secondary sources are well-integrated into argument and properly cited. Good use of MLA or APA format.
20 pts
Well Done
Vague thesis; nonacademic sources. Paragraphs are well-structured but not necessarily well-ordered. Primary sources are referenced.
15 pts
Satisfactory
Topic announcement rather than an analytical thesis statement. Underdeveloped paragraphs. Minimal research/citation.
10 pts
inadequate work
Lacks focus. Problems with sourcing and research.
0 pts
No Marks
Mild plagiarism. For example, the paper may occasionally paraphrase a source poorly with or without citation.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
Does the writer demonstrate a thorough comprehension of the subject? Do they omit major points, or do they cover the essential elements of the issue? Are there errors regarding plot, characters, and historical facts? Does the writer manage competing points of view fairly? Does the writer show good judgment in the way in which sources are assessed and used? Do they use the best possible evidence? Is there a clear relationship between each piece of evidence and the paper’s claim? Is the evidence arranged persuasively and logically?
50 pts
