Watch this videohttps://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/careers/2013/mylegalstudieslab/Paralegal_and_Professional/PP02_Helping_Client_Fill_Out_Forms.html all the approach by means of. Remember the fact that on this video, Alicia is appearing as a contract paralegal, not as an worker of the Saunders regulation agency. Reply the following:
What do you think of Alicia using the firm’s offices to meet with her “consumer?”
Alicia despatched Hutchinson “the official courtroom directions.” Is sending that doc to him UPL?
Alicia affords to fill out elements of the kind that Hutchinson would not perceive. Is it UPL if these questions are factual data, resembling Hutchinson’s identify and handle? Is it UPL if Alicia makes selections for Hutchinson on the kind?
Is there something mistaken with Hutchinson’s assertion that he needs to “take benefit of each loophole?”
Video Case Examine #three Questions:
Watch the first minute of this video
https://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/careers/2013/mylegalstudieslab/Paralegal_and_Professional/PP16_UPL_Issue_Helping_Client_Without_Law.html Paralegal Michael is making an attempt to be sympathetic listening to Sarah, who is anxious about her kids. She asks the point-blank Question Assignment: “What can I do? Reply the following:
Is Michael’s response authorized recommendation or just data?
If his response is authorized recommendation, does he repair his error by referring to the lawyer for recommendation?
Is there one thing else he might have mentioned, simply in case his earlier assertion might have been interpreted as authorized recommendation?
In the subsequent half of the video, Michael asks the consumer for data.
Is that this UPL?
How about when he asks her for paperwork and copies of e-mail? Is asking the consumer for this stuff (or any proof) UPL?
Sarah asks the subsequent point-blank Question Assignment: “What will the lawyer inform me?” What do you think of Michael’s response? Is it UPL?
Video Case Examine #four Questions:
Watch the first phase of
https://mediaplayer.pearsoncmg.com/property/OrlikA8 up to the place the place the narrator is asking questions and reply these questions. Poor Michael is making an attempt to get his supervising lawyer’s consideration, however she’s too busy. Reply the following:
She give him a signature stamp to use on solutions to interrogatories. What do you think of that? Ought to attorneys use signature stamps?
What about when she tells Michael to simply “be certain that they’re proper and ship them out?” What rule has she violated?
Earlier than occurring, can you think of some approaches Michael can take to get the supervision he wants?
Now watch the relaxation of the video and evaluate your solutions to Michael’s course of motion. Reply the following:
How do you think Michael did with the signature stamp problem?
What would you have mentioned?
Video Case Examine #5 Questions:
Watch the first phase of this video
https://mediaplayer.pearsoncmg.com/property/OrlikA7 after which reply the following:
It appears like Alicia has completely investigated the skilled witness. Is there something mistaken with that?
Is factual investigation one thing that’s in a paralegal’s job description?
When Saunders tells her to compile a listing of questions for his assessment after which she will “deal with” the video deposition, did that concern you in any approach?
Watch the video deposition after which come again and reply the following:
The opposite facet’s lawyer is in the room. Does that make Alicia’s deposition UPL?
What did you think of Alicia’s “introduction” of herself to the skilled on the video deposition?
Video Case Examine #6 Questions:
Watch this video
https://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/careers/2013/mylegalstudieslab/Paralegal_and_Professional/PP07_Client_Interview.html all the approach by means of after which reply the following:
Lawyer Saunders launched himself to the new consumer (“Hello, I am Roy Saunders.”), however he didn’t introduce Alicia. Did he violate the regulation by not figuring out himself as a lawyer?
Did he violate the regulation by not figuring out Alicia as a nonlawyer?
When Saunders leaves the room, he places Alicia in cost of the consumer interview, however she did not establish herself both. Has she violated some regulation?
Alicia asks the consumer a sequence of questions from an interview kind. Is she allowed to do that?
At the finish of this video clip, the consumer asks the point-blanks questions: “Do I’ve a case?” Does Alicia violate the UPL regulation of Virginia with her reply?
Can you think of some solutions she might have given the consumer that may have glad him, however wouldn’t be UPL?
—-
Watch the complete video at https://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/careers/2013/mylegalstudieslab/Paralegal and Skilled/PP02 Serving to Consumer Fill Out Kinds.html. Remember the fact that Alicia is functioning as a contract paralegal on this video, not as an worker of the Saunders regulation firm. Reply to the following questions:
What do you think about Alicia assembly with her “consumer” at the firm’s offices?
Hutchinson obtained “formal courtroom instructions” from Alicia. Is it unlawful to ship that materials to him?
Alicia affords to fill out the sections of the kind that Hutchinson doesn’t perceive. Is it UPL if the solutions to the questions are factual, resembling Hutchinson’s identify and handle? Is it UPL if Alicia fills out the kind for Hutchinson?
Is there something mistaken with Hutchinson’s declare that he needs to “exploit each loophole”?
Questions for Video Case Examine #three:
Keep watch over
