Why do you think the court ruled as it did?
In the Plessy v. Ferguson case, the Supreme Court ruled that racially separate services, if equal, didn’t breach the structure. In line with the court, segregation was not tantamount to discrimination (Browne-Marshall, 2013). In my view, the court it ruled as it did for a number of causes. For one, the court believed that part 1 of the 14th modification was solely relevant to political and civil rights (i.e. voting and serving on juries), and never on social rights (such as sitting in a railway car one selects). Secondly, the court believed that the 14th modification was solely relevant to the imposition of slavery itself. In the Cumming v. Richmond County Board case, the court ruled that the native governments had the vast discretion in schooling funding, and as such, held that the federal authorities had no energy to intervene with faculty operations (Browne-Marshall, 2013). In my view, the court ruled as it did as a result of it believed that the accountability of an area authorities was to arrange its instructional system and the method chosen by the state in the face of restricted financial sources didn’t violate part 1 of the 14th Modification.
What influences can you think of that will have motivated their determination?
In Plessy v. Ferguson, the incontrovertible fact that each whites and blacks have been supplied with equal services below the regulation and have been punished equally for infringing the regulation might have influenced the determination made by the court. Subsequently, the court seen Plessy’s arguments to consist in the presumption that the enforced separation of blacks and whites stamped the coloured race with an inferiority badge. In the Cumming v. Richmond County Board, the court’s determination was influenced by Article eight, Part 1 of the Structure of Georgia State. This part required boards to supply an in depth system of elementary colleges for English schooling, and to be supported by tax funds. For this reason the court was of the perception that the board’s motion was non-discriminatory in providing schooling for 300 elementary college students as a substitute of offering a highschool schooling for 60 college students.
Reference
Browne-Marshall, G. J. (2013). Race, Regulation, and American Society: 1607-Current. London,
England: Routledge.

Published by

Essays

View all posts